基于批发价格契约的供应链社会责任研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 15:05

本文选题：社会责任　切入点：供应链　出处：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：现在,若企业单纯得追求自身经济利益最大而忽视对社会责任的承担未必能实现收益最大。企业不再是孤立的,企业间的业务往来越来越多,一种网状结构逐步形成,供应链顺势而生。现实中,对于供应链上的企业,有的企业具有较强的讨价还价能力,而有的企业的讨价还价能力较弱,因此也造成各个节点企业在整条供应链中的影响力不同。本文基于批发价格契约进行社会责任研究,考虑包含单个供应商和单个零售商的供应链,其中供应商占主导地位,研究了信息对称下供应商和零售商分别作为责任主体的均衡,需求信息不对称借助转移支付协调上下游企业收益提高供应链整体收益的情形,成本信息不对称供应商是否存在谎报行为。研究结果表明,社会责任主体一方会把更多的成本转嫁给对方;零售商为责任主体,零售商没有动机同供应商一起分担供应商社会责任成本;需求信息不对称,借助转移支付,不仅供应链收益得到了大大提高,而且供应商和零售商的收益都得到提高;成本信息不对称,零售商作为责任主体和无责任主体,供应商不会谎报生产成本。
[Abstract]:Now, if the enterprise is simple pursuit of its greatest economic benefit and ignore social responsibility may not be able to achieve maximum profit. The enterprise is no longer isolated, more and more business dealings between enterprises, and gradually formed a network structure of the supply chain, homeopathy and health. In reality, for the enterprises in the supply chain, with a strong the bargaining power of some enterprises, and some enterprises bargaining power is weak, so the influence caused by the node enterprises in the supply chain. The research on the social responsibility of different wholesale price contract based on the consideration that contains a single supplier and single retailer supply chain, the dominant supplier, the supplier under the asymmetric information and as the main responsibility of retailer equilibrium, asymmetric demand information by means of transfer payment coordination of upstream and downstream enterprises to improve supply chain overall income income The case of asymmetric cost information suppliers if there are false behavior. The results show that the social responsibility of the main party will put more costs to other retailers; as the main responsibility, the retailers have no motivation together with supplier supplier share the cost of social responsibility; asymmetric demand information, by means of transfer payment, not only the supply chain revenue has been greatly enhanced. But the benefits of vendors and retailers are improved; the cost of information asymmetry, retailers as the main responsibility and the main responsibility, the supplier does not lie in production costs.

【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F274

【参考文献】