基于不同回收模式的闭环供应链收益协调研究

发布时间：2018-04-04 10:13

本文选题：闭环供应链　切入点：收益协调　出处：《天津大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着对社会可持续发展要求的提高，环境问题越来越受到人们的广泛关注，企业在生产制造过程中也越来越重视对环境的伤害。一方面，企业管理者需要面向全球市场，与其他相关成员企业积极配合与合作，以求获得更高的收益；另一方面，对废旧产品进行回收不仅可以有效降低资源浪费，也能帮助企业降低成本、树立良好的社会形象。本文首先对废旧产品回收模式和供应链内成员的收益协调问题进行分析，然后针对由一个制造商、两个零售商和一个第三方回收商构成的闭环供应链系统，在零售商分散决策和集中决策情境下，应用博弈论探讨在零售商、制造商和第三方分别主导回收这三种回收模式下，供应链内制造商、零售商1、零售商2和回收商的收益协调问题。进而对不同回收模式下供应链的整体收益和各成员的收益情况进行比较分析，包括不同回收主导下供应链成员与整体收益差的比较分析，同时也分析了不同回收主导下供应链成员及整体的收益分配趋势。最后通过算例验证模型的可行性与准确性。结果表明：（1）在零售商分散决策情境下制造商收益较大，且在第三方回收商回收模式下，零售商分散决策带给制造商的收益更为明显。（2）在零售商集中决策情境下，零售商的收益较大，且在零售商主导回收时要比制造商回收与第三方回收商主导回收更为显著。（3）在零售商分散、集中决策情境下，回收商的收益一致，与零售商的决策情境无关。（4）制造商主导回收和第三方主导回收模式下，在零售商分散决策时供应链整体收益较大，且供应链整体收益在第三方主导回收模式下明显高于其它回收模式。而在零售商主导回收模式下，供应链整体收益在零售商何种决策模式下较大则受市场容量的影响。
[Abstract]:With the improvement of social sustainable development, more and more attention has been paid to environmental problems, and enterprises pay more and more attention to the harm to the environment in the process of production and manufacture.On the one hand, business managers need to face the global market and actively cooperate and cooperate with other relevant member enterprises in order to achieve higher returns; on the other hand, recycling used and used products can not only effectively reduce waste of resources,Also can help the enterprise to reduce the cost, sets up the good social image.This paper first analyzes the recycling model of waste products and the revenue coordination of the members in the supply chain, and then aims at the closed-loop supply chain system, which consists of a manufacturer, two retailers and a third-party recycler.In the context of decentralized and centralized decision-making of retailers, the game theory is applied to explore the manufacturers in the supply chain under the three recovery modes of retailers, manufacturers and third parties, respectively, which are dominated by retailers, manufacturers and third parties.Retailer 1, retailer 2 and recycler's income coordination problem.Then the paper makes a comparative analysis of the overall income of the supply chain and the income of the members of the supply chain under different recovery modes, including the comparative analysis of the difference between the members of the supply chain and the overall income under different recovery patterns.At the same time, it also analyzes the distribution trend of the supply chain members and the whole income under different recovery.Finally, the feasibility and accuracy of the model are verified by an example.The results show that: 1) under the situation of retailer's decentralized decision, the manufacturer's profit is larger, and under the model of third-party recycler's recovery, the retailer's decentralized decision brings the manufacturer's profit more obviously. (2) in the situation of retailer's centralized decision, the retailer's profit is more obvious than that of the retailer's centralized decision.The retailer's profit is larger, and when the retailer dominates the recovery, it is more significant than the manufacturer's and the third-party recycler's.) in the situation of the retailer's dispersion and centralized decision, the recycler's income is the same.Under the pattern of manufacturer leading recycling and third party leading recovery, the overall profit of the supply chain is larger when the retailer makes a decentralized decision.And the overall revenue of supply chain is obviously higher than that of other models under the third-party-led recovery mode.In the retailer dominated recovery mode, the overall profit of the supply chain is influenced by the market capacity under what kind of decision-making mode.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F713.2;F274

【参考文献】