基于供应链融资背景的产业链“链合创新”博弈分析

发布时间：2018-05-08 11:33

本文选题：链合创新 + 合作研发　；参考：《合肥工业大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着市场竞争的加剧以及从技术到产品时间的缩短,企业若要提高创新效率,规避创新风险,就必须以更有效的方式来进行创新并改进创新模式。经过不断的创新实践,企业也逐步认识到与产业链内企业进行合作研发的必要性。然而,由于中小企业融资越来越难,企业进行独立创新的风险也越来越大,如何为企业的技术创新投入进行融资成为了链合创新实践中的核心问题。因此,研究供应链融资背景下产业链“链合创新”的博弈问题具有重要的理论和现实意义。论文从供应链融资模式为技术创新投入进行融资的角度出发,构建了的链合创新博弈模型,采用逆向归纳法,针对一个由提供中间产品的上游供应商和制造最终产品的下游制造商组成的两层产业结构,以及由提供中间产品的上游供应商、制造最终产品的中游制造商和销售最终产品的下游分销商的三层产业结构,分析比较了产业链内企业在不同的创新形式下各参与者的策略选择和期望收益函数。结论表明：合作创新相对于非合作创新有着更高的期望收益、期望产出以及创新度。最后,本文提出进一步落实“以企业为主体”的创新战略、建立多方面全方位的合作模式以及建立以核心企业为中心的合作创新机制等相关政策建议。
[Abstract]:With the aggravation of market competition and the shortening of time from technology to product, if enterprises want to improve the efficiency of innovation and avoid the risk of innovation, they must innovate in a more effective way and improve the innovation mode. After continuous innovation and practice, enterprises gradually recognize the necessity of R & D cooperation with enterprises in the industrial chain. However, because the financing of SMEs is becoming more and more difficult, and the risk of independent innovation is increasing, how to finance the technological innovation of enterprises has become the core problem in the practice of chain innovation. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the game of "chain innovation" in the context of supply chain financing. From the point of view that supply chain financing mode is financing technology innovation input, this paper constructs a chain innovation game model, and adopts reverse induction method. A two-tier industrial structure consisting of upstream suppliers of intermediate products and downstream manufacturers of final products, as well as upstream suppliers of intermediate products, This paper analyzes and compares the strategic choice and the expected income function of the enterprises in the industrial chain under different innovation forms between the middle manufacturer of the final product and the downstream distributor of the final product. The conclusion shows that cooperative innovation has higher expected income, expected output and higher degree of innovation than non-cooperative innovation. Finally, this paper puts forward some relevant policy suggestions, such as implementing the innovation strategy of "taking the enterprise as the main body", establishing the cooperation mode in all aspects and establishing the cooperative innovation mechanism with the core enterprise as the center.
【学位授予单位】：合肥工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F274

【参考文献】