地方政府补贴下跨区域绿色供应链协调的效率与公平研究
[Abstract]:With the increasingly strengthening of resource and environmental constraints, the concept of green and low-carbon development is widely accepted, which makes the theory of green supply chain management become the focus of global attention. As the participants and stakeholders of green supply chain system, manufacturing enterprises, retailers, consumers and governments, all of them can only cooperate, supervise and restrict the green supply chain system by taking into account economic benefits and environmental constraints. Only on the basis of pursuing the maximization of economic and social benefits of green supply chain can we realize the best self-interest. The participating enterprises in green supply chain often belong to different administrative jurisdiction because of their different geographical location, so their decision-making behavior of participating green supply chain management is influenced and restricted by the relevant policies of local governments. At present, there are two problems to be solved in the coordination of green supply chain: (1) how to make the sales price and green degree of products according to the intervention policy of local government to ensure the efficiency of supply chain coordination; (2) how the local government make reasonable intervention policy to ensure the fairness of the participating enterprises in the cross-regional green supply chain. Aiming at these two problems, based on the previous experience and research results, this paper discusses the coordination of efficiency and fairness of the participating enterprises in the local government subsidy order stage and multi-stage green supply chain respectively. The main research contents are as follows: (1) the coordination of green supply chain between the two enterprises. Firstly, considering the substitution of products to consumers, the price and green degree of the products are introduced into the demand function of the products. Secondly, aiming at the intervention policy of local government only subsidizing green products, the green supply chain coordination model of two competitive enterprises is constructed based on Bertrand game. Finally, the relationship between local government subsidy and product sales price and green degree is analyzed. (2) the coordination of multi-stage cross-regional green supply chain under local government subsidy. According to the multi-stage cross-regional green supply chain with different local government subsidies, considering that the market demand is affected by different product sales price and green degree, Based on Stackelberg game, the multi-stage cross-regional green supply chain coordination model is constructed. This paper analyzes the decision making and local government subsidy strategy of participating enterprises in multi-stage green supply chain with different demand. (3) the equity of cross-regional green supply chain under local government subsidy. Aiming at the influence of different local government intervention policies on the participating enterprises in the cross-regional green supply chain, considering the multi-stage structure green supply chain and the general network structure green supply chain, taking the Thiel index as the upper level decision goal, this paper discusses the influence of different local government intervention policies on the participating enterprises in different stages in the cross-regional green supply chain. Taking the coordination of multi-stage green supply chain under the government subsidy of Stackelberg game as the lower level decision goal, a bilevel programming model is constructed. Based on the analysis of the minimum unfairness of the participating enterprises in the cross-regional green supply chain, this paper analyzes the decision making and local government subsidy strategy of the participating enterprises in the green supply chain.
【学位授予单位】:浙江工商大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F274
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邱国斌;;不同政府补贴模式对制造商与零售商决策的影响[J];科学决策;2013年07期
2 罗艾奇;;政府补贴——救命稻草还是致命鸦片?[J];时代金融;2013年20期
3 ;2006年度上海市政府补贴培训项目说明[J];成才与就业;2006年04期
4 唐清泉;罗党论;;政府补贴动机及其效果的实证研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J];金融研究;2007年06期
5 徐斌;;技术领先者进入下的本土企业R&D合作与政府补贴[J];工业技术经济;2008年01期
6 汤敏;;政府补贴可少给企业多给居民[J];先锋队;2013年08期
7 杨子山;;1998-2012年全球棉花政府补贴总计(所有项目)[J];中国棉花;2013年06期
8 王一卉;;政府补贴、研发投入与企业创新绩效——基于所有制、企业经验与地区差异的研究[J];经济问题探索;2013年07期
9 崔锐;;政治联系与政府补贴关系述评[J];商;2013年04期
10 邱国斌;;不同权重下政府补贴对供应链的影响[J];技术经济;2013年12期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 章桂红;陈泽华;;中小企业政府补贴的策略选择[A];行政管理学视阈中县域经济与中小企业健康成长之路(湖北行政管理论坛2009)[C];2009年
2 王一涛;;教育与公共产品——对一种错误观点的澄清[A];2006年中国教育经济学年会会议论文集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 德商;欧盟委员会公布政府补贴情况[N];国际经贸消息;2002年
2 本报记者普布旺堆 实习生夏玉娟;我地为12家困难企业发放政府补贴资金251.8万元[N];山南报(汉);2009年
3 吴文彪 李杏;全国政协委员建言规范政府补贴行为[N];人民政协报;2012年
4 本报记者 桂小笋;受益1.25亿政府补贴 澳洋科技2012年扭亏为盈[N];证券日报;2013年
5 记者 刘艳 整理;变味的政府补贴当休矣[N];经济参考报;2014年
6 潘清;近九成上市公司获政府补贴 “免费补药”考问公平[N];中华建筑报;2014年
7 本报评论员 张立伟;应该对部分地方政府补贴进行效果评估[N];21世纪经济报道;2014年
8 江德斌;政府补贴居家养老是一个好政策[N];嘉兴日报;2014年
9 符向军;政府补贴“居家养老”值得提倡[N];上海金融报;2014年
10 石勇生邋吴潜锋;今年拆解改造可享受政府补贴[N];中国水运报;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 吕镯;补贴对装备制造企业创新水平的影响研究[D];大连理工大学;2015年
2 程然;地方政府补贴下跨区域绿色供应链协调的效率与公平研究[D];浙江工商大学;2015年
3 王晨;上市公司政府补贴的动机及政策效应研究[D];复旦大学;2013年
4 李梦媛;政府补贴、出口与企业创新能力[D];南京大学;2015年
5 张小娜;地方政府补贴与上市公司扭亏的实证研究[D];西南财经大学;2011年
6 钱俊明;政府补贴对上市公司创新绩效的影响研究[D];安徽财经大学;2015年
7 徐浩辰;金融危机下国有产权背景与政府补贴的关系研究[D];西南财经大学;2013年
8 余例恒;环保产品纵向合作研发与政府补贴策略研究[D];电子科技大学;2012年
9 谢悦;战略性新兴产业政府补贴绩效[D];南京大学;2013年
10 袁艺;预算软约束下的政府补贴与企业寻租[D];西南财经大学;2014年
,本文编号:2364559
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gongyinglianguanli/2364559.html