股东投票权价购问题之检讨
发布时间:2018-01-09 12:35
本文关键词:股东投票权价购问题之检讨 出处:《河北大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:投票权价购早已有之,不过是The Schreiber court针对Schreiber v. Carney案例开始对投票权价购予以界定,并改变了完全禁止投票权价购的态度,,对于通过TheSchreiber court分析的投票权价购持允许态度。美国特拉化州关于投票权价购司法实践变革给予各国对于投票权价购的规制提供了经验性参考,结合我国台湾地区对于投票权价购规制的变迁,最初我国禁止投票权价购符合时宜,但是随着证券市场的发展,公司治理机制的完善,新型公司问题的不断出现,允许投票权价购,构建投票权价购的规制机制已经是我国立法所面临的重要课题。 本文引入投票权价购的定义,明确投票权价购对于公司治理以及股东财富的重大意义。检讨反对投票权价购理由,得出结论:无论是从平等、异化、效率还是成本角度来看,已经提出的完全禁止投票权价购理由并不成立。本文介绍了美国特拉化州关于投票权价购司法实践变革,评述了The Schreiber court分析,借鉴了台湾地区对于投票权价购的规制经验,结合投票权价购的在我国的实践现状、现行立法和规章的态度,针对未来趋势进而提出构建我国投票权价购制度的建议,以期对于我国投票权价购的立法完善起到些许作用。
[Abstract]:Voting price has long been available, but it was The Schreiber court that began defining the price of voting in the Schreiber v. Carney case. And changed the total ban on voting price buying attitude. Through TheSchreiber. Court analysis of the voting price purchase attitude. The United States of America on the legal practice of voting price purchase to the United States to provide empirical reference to the regulation of price purchase of voting rights. Combined with the change of the regulation of voting price purchase in Taiwan area, the prohibition of voting price purchase in our country is timely at first, but with the development of securities market and the perfection of corporate governance mechanism. With the emergence of new company problems, it is an important subject for legislation in China to allow voting price to buy and to set up the regulation mechanism of voting price purchase. This paper introduces the definition of voting price purchase, clarifies the significance of voting price purchase to corporate governance and shareholder wealth. Review the reasons against voting price purchase, and draw a conclusion: whether from equality, alienation. From the point of view of efficiency or cost, the reason that has been put forward to prohibit voting price purchase is not valid. This paper introduces the reform of judicial practice of voting price purchase in the United States of America. This paper reviews the analysis of The Schreiber court, draws lessons from Taiwan's experience in regulating voting price purchase, and combines the practical situation of voting price purchase in China. In view of the future trend, the author puts forward some suggestions on the construction of China's voting price purchase system in the light of the current legislation and regulations, in order to play a little role in perfecting the legislation of voting price purchase in our country.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D922.291.91;D922.28;F832.51
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 汤春来;公司民主的实现与治理机制的完善[J];湖北广播电视大学学报;2003年01期
2 王继军;股份有限公司累积投票制度研究[J];中国法学;1998年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 丁绍宽;公司投票机制的法律经济学分析[D];华东政法大学;2008年
本文编号:1401440
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/huobilw/1401440.html