制度金融学的起源:从门格尔到克洛尔

发布时间：2018-02-04 08:34

  本文关键词： 制度金融学 货币演进范式 交易成本货币理论 “Clower约束”　出处：《东岳论丛》2010年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文试图对涉及制度因素的早期货币金融理论加以梳理,据此探究制度金融学的理论渊源。基于对新古典金融学基本假设与理论困境的重新认识,首先确认长期被新古典学派推崇的瓦尔拉斯(Walras)均衡框架难以成为讨论货币金融问题的合适基础,因此金融学的制度分析便应运而生。随后对在制度金融学基本分析框架形成过程中具有启蒙与奠基意义的相关经典理论进行梳理与评论,主要涉及门格尔(Menger)的货币演进范式及其货币内生起源观点的制度含义;希克斯(Hicks)的交易成本货币理论与金融制度演进观点;克洛尔(Clower)以构建货币理论微观基础为核心并试图在新古典金融学与制度金融学之间建立逻辑联系的相关观点以及尼汉斯(Niehans)等的补充与扩展等。
[Abstract]:This paper attempts to comb the early monetary and financial theories involving institutional factors and explore the theoretical origin of institutional finance based on a new understanding of the basic assumptions and theoretical dilemmas of neoclassical finance. First of all, it is recognized that the Walass-Walras) equilibrium framework, which has long been respected by the neoclassical school, is not an appropriate basis for discussing monetary and financial issues. Therefore, the institutional analysis of finance came into being. Then, the relevant classical theories with enlightenment and foundation significance in the formation of the basic analytical framework of institutional finance were combed and commented. The paper mainly deals with the paradigm of monetary evolution and the institutional meaning of the viewpoint of endogenous origin of money. Hicks' theory of transaction cost money and the evolution of financial system; "Clower" (the related viewpoint of constructing the microscopic foundation of monetary theory and trying to establish the logical connection between neoclassical finance and institutional finance, and Hans Niehanss). Supplement and extend etc.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学金融政策研究中心;
【基金】：2007年度国家社会科学基金重点项目“科学发展观与新时期深化中国金融体制改革的政策选择”(项目批准号:07AJY015) “十一五”国家科技支撑计划(项目批准号:2006BAJ07B01)的支持
【分类号】：F830
【正文快照】： 一、两种金融学的“鸿沟”任何学科或者理论每前进一步,分歧与争论便如影相随。金融学的发展也不例外。起初,和其它经济学分支一样,在十分严格的假定条件下,金融学形成了相当“超脱”且简捷明了的逻辑框架。由于不存在交易成本,金融市场可以无摩擦运行,参与金融交易过程的当，

本文编号：1489822