考虑公平偏好的委托模式融通仓银行对3PL激励
发布时间:2018-06-15 02:32
本文选题:公平偏好 + 委托模式 ; 参考:《管理工程学报》2010年01期
【摘要】:第三方物流(Third party logistics,3PL)努力工作和积极参与是融通仓有效运作的重要因素,因此促使其努力工作是一个非常重要的问题。本文在传统委托代理模型中加入"公平偏好"因素,并从是否考虑"公平偏好"因素两个方面,研究银行对3PL的激励问题。研究发现,考虑"公平偏好"因素后,银行给3PL的固定报酬高于传统委托代理模型中最优固定支付时,3PL会在最优努力程度上再增加一定数量的额外努力以回报银行的善意,且3PL"公平偏好"行为越强,增加的努力数量就越多,从而使银行收益高于传统委托代理模型中3PL选择最优努力水平时的收益。本文意义在于银行可以根据3PL"公平偏好"的强弱,合理设计报酬机制,以进一步增加自身收益。
[Abstract]:The hard work and active participation of the third party logistic 3PLs are the important factors for the effective operation of the finance warehouse, so it is a very important problem to promote the hard work of the third party logistics (TPL). In this paper, we introduce the "fair preference" factor into the traditional principal-agent model, and study the incentive problem of the 3PL from the perspective of whether or not to consider the "fair preference" factor. It is found that after taking into account the "fair preference" factor, the fixed remuneration of 3PL is higher than that of the optimal fixed payment in the traditional principal-agent model. The 3PL will increase a certain amount of extra effort to repay the bank's goodwill in the degree of optimal effort. The stronger the behavior of "fair preference" of 3PL is, the more effort is increased, which makes the income of bank higher than that of traditional principal-agent model when 3PL chooses the optimal level of effort. The meaning of this paper is that banks can reasonably design compensation mechanism according to the strength of "fair preference" of 3PL in order to further increase their own income.
【作者单位】: 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70872123,70572028)
【分类号】:F830.3;F272.92;F224
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 蒲勇健;;植入“公平博弈”的委托—代理模型——来自行为经济学的一个贡献[J];当代财经;2007年03期
2 闫俊宏;许祥秦;;基于供应链金融的中小企业融资模式分析[J];上海金融;2007年02期
3 徐玖平,陈书建;不对称信息下风险投资的委托代理模型研究[J];系统工程理论与实践;2004年01期
4 应雯s,
本文编号:2020176
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/huobilw/2020176.html