当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 旅游管理论文 >

古村镇旅游中遗产保护预警系统的构建

发布时间:2018-01-04 16:38

  本文关键词:古村镇旅游中遗产保护预警系统的构建 出处:《广西师范大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 古村镇 旅游 遗产保护 预警系统 构建


【摘要】:古村镇凭借其“独居世外”的乡村气息和自身浓郁的历史、科学、文化价值而成为了当下人们出游的“热点”。这些古村镇都是数百甚至上千年来人类文明的见证和结晶,是研究人类发展的“活化石”,因此具有脆弱性和不可再生性。大量游客的到来,虽然活跃了当地的经济,却给当地文化遗产的保护带来巨大压力,甚至威胁到遗产的可持续发展。因此笔者尝试构建一个古村镇遗产保护预警系统,通过对遗产地相应指标的有效监测,及时掌握当地遗产的生存现状,并有的放矢地采取相应的预控措施,避免遗产的完整性和原真性遭受破坏,保证遗产的持续传承,进而促进当地旅游的健康发展。 古村镇遗产保护预警系统是基于“事前控制”的思想来构建的,其与其他遗产保护措施的最大区别就在于它能根据遗产指标数据对遗产未来的发展现状预先评估,并对可能存在的隐患实现早发现,早控制。古村镇遗产保护预警系统基本遵循了“发现警情——确定警源——明确警限——排除警情”这一警情处置过程来构建的。其中预警系统构建的核心是确定遗产评价指标,本文笔者通过文献整理、分析、筛选以及实地调查共选取32个指标,其中基础指标17个,参照指标15个,并根据指标属性将其分为物质遗产指标、非物质遗产指标、社会指标、经济指标、参照指标等。之后笔者通过历史数据分析法、系统分析法等来确定各评价指标的警情区间,作为遗产地警情判定的参照标准。最后通过AHP分析法确定各评价指标的权重和判定相应指标的警情,并计算遗产地所有指标综合警情值,与已经确定的警情区间对照分析最终明确遗产地当前警情,完成预警过程。整个遗产预警过程主要是建立在对评价指标的量化分析基础上,因此具有较好的客观说服性。通过构建预警系统来实现对遗产的保护,不仅丰富了遗产地可持续发展理论,而且为遗产监管和保护部门的相关工作提供了便利,使其能够对遗产警情的处置做到有的放矢,从而增加遗产监管的信度和警情处置的效度。 为了论证该预警系统的可行性,笔者以平安寨为例进行了实际应用研究,结合当地实际情况,从中选取了19个较有代表性的指标进行了相关警情的分析,得出平安寨近三年来警情由轻警向中警发展,遗产生存现状表现出恶化之势。之后笔者对各警情产生的缘由进行了探讨和分析,并对该地未来遗产保护提出了相应的意见和建议。
[Abstract]:The ancient villages and towns by virtue of its "living world" rustic and its rich historical, scientific, cultural value and become a "hot spot" of people's travel. These ancient villages are hundreds or even thousands of witnesses and the crystallization of human civilization for thousands of years, is the study of human development "living fossil", so it has vulnerability and non renewable. A large number of tourists coming, although active in the local economy, but the protection to the local cultural heritage has brought tremendous pressure, and even threaten the sustainable development of heritage. Therefore the author attempts to construct a heritage of ancient villages and towns protection warning system, through the effective monitoring of the relevant indicators of heritage sites, grasp the survival status of the local heritage, and take corresponding preventive measures, avoid the integrity and authenticity of heritage destruction, to ensure sustainable heritage, and promote local tourism health Development.
The system of ancient villages and towns heritage protection warning is constructed based on "pre control" thought, the biggest difference with other heritage protection measures is that it can according to a pre evaluation of the current situation of the development of future heritage heritage index data, and the possible risks to achieve early discovery, early control. The system of ancient villages and towns basic heritage protection warning follow the "discovery of police intelligence -- the determination of warning source -- clear alarm: excluding the alarm and the alarm disposal process to construct the core. Early warning system is built to determine the heritage evaluation index, this paper through literature collation, analysis, screening and investigation of 32 indicators were selected, including 17 basic indicators a reference index 15, and divided into material heritage index according to the index attribute, the intangible cultural heritage index, social indicators, economic indicators, reference indexes. The author through historical data According to the analysis method, system analysis method to determine the evaluation index of the alarm range, as the reference standard of heritage alarm judgment. Finally through the AHP analysis method to determine the weights of evaluation indexes and determine the corresponding index of police intelligence, and calculate the heritage of all indicators comprehensive warning value, and have determined the alarm interval control analysis finally clear heritage current alarm, complete early warning process. The entire estate early-warning process is mainly based on the analysis of the quantitative evaluation index on the basis of, so with the objective of persuasive good. Through the construction of early warning system to realize the protection of heritage, heritage not only enrich the theory of sustainable development, but also provides convenience for the work related to the supervision and protection of the heritage sector, so that it can be the legacy of the police intelligence disposal be targeted, thus increasing the reliability and disposal of police intelligence heritage supervision validity.
In order to demonstrate the feasibility of the early warning system, the author in Pingan village as an example, according to the local actual situation, selected from 19 representative indexes were analyzed by the relevant police intelligence, that Ping An village nearly three years from the light alarm to the police police development, living heritage the status quo showed a worsening trend. The reason after the author of each alarm generation are discussed and analyzed, and the future of heritage protection and put forward the corresponding opinions and suggestions.

【学位授予单位】:广西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:G122;F592

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 姚光钰,刘一举;徽州古村落选址风水意象[J];安徽建筑;1998年06期

2 陈甲全;张义丰;陈美景;;古村落研究综述[J];安徽农业科学;2008年23期

3 魏胜林;茅晓伟;肖湘东;付哓渝;向华明;陈荣伟;徐梦萤;;拙政园古树名木监测预警标准与保护措施研究[J];安徽农业科学;2010年16期

4 李淑娟;;新时期陕西农村非物质文化遗产的保护研究[J];安徽农业科学;2011年25期

5 陈国阶,何锦峰;生态环境预警的理论和方法探讨[J];重庆环境科学;1999年04期

6 赵立兵;史甲庆;;试论非物质文化遗产预警指标体系的构建——基于社会和谐稳定模型的思考[J];重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版);2011年03期

7 阮仪三,吴承照;历史城镇可持续发展机制和对策——以平遥古城为例[J];城市发展研究;2001年03期

8 赵勇;张捷;李娜;梁莉;;历史文化村镇保护评价体系及方法研究——以中国首批历史文化名镇(村)为例[J];地理科学;2006年04期

9 左军;层次分析法中判断矩阵的间接给出法[J];系统工程;1988年06期

10 程晓玲;潘超;;西递古村落文化遗产保护预警系统——“非明清”建筑要素浅析[J];安徽建筑工业学院学报(自然科学版);2012年06期



本文编号:1379233

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/lvyoujiudianguanlilunwen/1379233.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户33ec2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com