中美公共景区成本补偿方式的差异研究

发布时间：2018-03-17 11:49

本文选题：公共景区　切入点：成本补偿　出处：《经济管理》2014年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在景区的管理实践中,依托于自然或人文资源建立的景区在获得财政拨款的同时,还会通过收售门票以及其他经营项目筹集景区开发、运营、维护过程中所需的资金,也即财政拨款与(门票等)经营收人已成为景区进行成本补偿的两个重要的资金来源,各国情况均是如此。但通过对比不难发现,我国景区与美国景区之间在成本补偿的安排上存在很大差异。本文从中美公共景区成本补偿方式的对比出发,通过探究该差异产生的主要原因,分析景区成本补偿方式的最佳确定模式。研究结果表明,普遍认为的中美景区竞争性程度的差异并不显著,更无法作为解释中美景区成本补偿方式产生巨大差异的原因,差异背后的决定因素应是门票价格制定过程中民众的参与程度,以及民众意愿在多大程度上可以影响最终的价格标准设定。
[Abstract]:In the management practice of the scenic spots, when the scenic spots built on natural or human resources obtain financial allocations, they will also raise the funds needed in the process of developing, operating and maintaining the scenic spots through the collection and sale of tickets and other business projects. That is, financial allocations and (tickets) have become two important sources of funding for cost compensation in scenic spots. This is true of all countries. But it is not difficult to find out by comparison. There are great differences in the arrangement of cost compensation between Chinese scenic spots and American scenic spots. The research results show that the difference of competitive degree between Chinese and American scenic spots is not significant, nor can it be used as the explanation for the huge difference in the way of cost compensation between Chinese and American scenic spots. The decisive factor behind the difference should be the participation of the public in the process of making ticket price and the extent to which the public will influence the final price standard setting.
【作者单位】：上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院;
【分类号】：F592;F597.12

【参考文献】