定性旅游研究:表达规范与反思——基于2000—2013年《旅游学刊》载文分析

发布时间：2018-05-02 13:38

本文选题：定性研究 + 旅游研究　；参考：《旅游学刊》2017年01期

【摘要】：鉴于学科分野的原因,不同学科有着不同的定性研究表达传统,在学科内部的交流并不会形成交流障碍或批评焦点。而旅游研究是一个多学科交叉领域,定性研究方法及其成果表达常会形成分歧。文章在总结定性研究评价相关研究的基础上,以《旅游学刊》2000—2013年定性研究论文为分析对象,从定性旅游研究的表达规范与表达逻辑等几个方面对57篇样本文献进行元分析(meta-analysis),发现目前定性研究表达主要存在的问题是对研究问题的概念关系与理论框架、研究策略与研究方法过程介绍不充分,对研究问题与研究方法、研究材料与研究结论的逻辑一致性关注不够,对研究结论的可信度影响因素未进行充分说明。在此基础上,作者反思了旅游定性研究的发展趋势与关注重点。
[Abstract]:Due to the reason of the separation of disciplines, different disciplines have different traditions of qualitative research and expression. Communication within disciplines does not form communication barriers or critical focus. Tourism research is a multidisciplinary field, qualitative research methods and their results are often divided. On the basis of summarizing the relevant research on qualitative research and evaluation, this paper takes the qualitative research papers of the Journal of Tourism from 2000 to 2013 as the object of analysis. The meta-analysis of 57 sample literatures is carried out from the aspects of expression criterion and expression logic of qualitative tourism research. It is found that the main problem of qualitative research expression is the conceptual relationship and theoretical framework of the research. The research strategies and research methods are not introduced sufficiently, and the logical consistency of research problems and methods, research materials and conclusions is not paid enough attention to, and the factors influencing the credibility of research conclusions are not fully explained. On this basis, the author reflects on the development trend and focus of tourism qualitative research.
【作者单位】：中山大学旅游学院;中山大学-美国伊利诺伊大学香槟分校国家公园国际联合实验室(张家界);
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“遗产旅游地权力、认同与责任的互动机制及其影响研究”(41471122)资助~~
【分类号】：+

【相似文献】