博弈与互惠—利川旅游社区参与理论的实证研究
[Abstract]:The rapid development of tourism has brought great economic benefits and broad development prospects, which has been widely concerned by the government, enterprises, communities, scholars and so on. This study intends to use community theory to analyze the participation relationship and characteristics of tourism stakeholders in Lichuan. This research is divided into four parts. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the background and significance of the research, puts forward the content of this study, summarizes the research methods, and reviews the relevant studies at home and abroad, which is the theoretical basis of this study. The second part introduces the basic situation of tourism in Lichuan. The author selects four representative scenic spots in Lichuan, such as Tenglong Cave, Big well, Dragon Boat Water Township, Fobao Mountain, to conduct field investigation, and analyze the first-hand data comprehensively. Describing the community participation of each scenic spot is the case support of this study. Tenglong Cave scenic area income is better. The reciprocity is: with the deep development of Tenglong Cave, the scenic spot has built the highway for the local residents, which is convenient for the residents of the community to travel; The government provides the service to the enterprise, guarantees the scenic spot normal operation, the corresponding scenic spot successfully manages, enhances the Lichuan popularity. The game shows that local community residents are willing to participate in tourism sharing results, but due to various factors, they are not enough to participate, and scenic spots are unwilling to carry out the government's decision to create A due to cost factors. The community participation in Daxi Scenic spot is not very hot. Residents around the high participation enthusiasm, but the scenic area enterprise initiative is not enough, the effect of participation is not good, share the dividend less, the performance of reciprocity is not outstanding. The benefit game is shown as: the profit of the scenic spots allocated to the related tourism enterprises is not high, which leads to the travel agencies and other related enterprises consider less scenic spots in the arrangement of tourism products, and the tourist market has been depressed; The development of scenic spot has not reached the expected goal of the government, and it is in a dilemma; there are land disputes between the scenic spot and the surrounding residents. These games hinder the development of Daxi scenic spot. Dragon boat water scenic areas of the contradictions are relatively concentrated. The game features are obvious: the contradiction between scenic spots and surrounding residents is prominent; the relationship with the government is not harmonious; travel agencies and other related enterprises to the scenic spot evaluation is not high. The development of scenic spot brings direct economic income to boatmen, tour guides and other community residents. During the normal operating period of the floating scenic spot in Fobao Mountain, the level of community participation is high. The government, enterprises, and community residents are all able to participate in the development of tourism, and their respective interests are better safeguarded. However, the scenic spots are closed down because of safety accidents. The original situation of community participation no longer, and then evolved to hope that the government to help enterprises out of difficulties. The third part uses the theory of community participation to analyze the four selected cases, found that there are four cases of scenic spots between the government, enterprises, community residents of the interests of the sharing and game, and then summed up the characteristics of tourism community participation in two types of Lichuan. One is the game type community participation, the other is the reciprocal community participation. The fourth part is the conclusion, according to the current situation of community participation in tourism, from the community capacity building, limited government participation and enterprise initiative as three aspects to improve the efficiency of community participation, put forward an effective participation model. We hope to realize the mutual benefit between tourism participants and extend to other scenic spots in Lichuan.
【学位授予单位】:湖北民族学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F592.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 丁敏;李宏;;旅游社区增权理论研究综述[J];首都师范大学学报(自然科学版);2016年03期
2 孙凤芝;许峰;;社区参与旅游发展研究评述与展望[J];中国人口.资源与环境;2013年07期
3 杨霞;;旅游人类学发展述评[J];民族论坛;2013年06期
4 保继刚;杨昀;;旅游商业化背景下本地居民地方依恋的变迁研究——基于阳朔西街的案例分析[J];广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年04期
5 惠红;唐兵;敬阳;;旅游发展中社区参与差异的文化原因分析[J];旅游论坛;2010年05期
6 刘丽梅;吕君;;中国社区参与旅游发展研究述评[J];地理科学进展;2010年08期
7 李航;李伟;;民族社区参与旅游发展问题的研究——以西双版纳民族社区为例[J];旅游研究;2010年02期
8 张晓萍;刘德鹏;;人类学视野中的旅游对目的地负面影响研究述评[J];青海民族研究;2010年01期
9 孙九霞;;旅游对目的地社区族群认同的影响——基于不同旅游作用的案例分析[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
10 保继刚;孙九霞;;雨崩村社区旅游:社区参与方式及其增权意义[J];旅游论坛;2008年04期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 王会战;文化遗产地社区旅游增权研究[D];西北大学;2015年
2 王咏;社区居民感知视角下黄山风景区门户城镇旅游发展特征与机理研究[D];安徽师范大学;2014年
3 操建华;旅游业对中国农村和农民的影响的研究[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 曾艳;国内外社区参与旅游发展模式比较研究[D];厦门大学;2007年
2 王敏娴;乡村旅游社区参与机制研究[D];浙江大学;2004年
,本文编号:2394991
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/lvyoujiudianguanlilunwen/2394991.html