陕西省装备制造业与生产性服务业的融合度测算及影响因素研究
本文关键词: 装备制造业 生产性服务业 产业融合度 出处:《山西财经大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:装备制造业与生产性服务业有着天然的关联关系。生产性服务业作为中间投入性产业,为装备制造业的产品生产提供先进的技术与配套的服务,同时为其提供产后的市场营销、物流运输、产品保障等一体化服务,降低装备制造企业的制造及交易成本,促进产业的转型与升级;而装备制造业对生产性服务需求的不断增加会提高生产性服务业的技术与服务创新水平,以便更好的为装备制造企业提供先进技术与服务。因此,装备制造业与生产性服务业融合发展能够推动装备制造业的转型升级,促进生产性服务业的多样化、多元化发展,同时带给消费者更多的经济与社会效益。目前,已有文献对两大产业融合的研究大多是从理论层面展开的,主要是对两大产业融合的发展理论、融合的基本模式、融合的路径等方面的研究。在研究过程中对两大产业的融合度测算、融合影响因素有所涉及,但是多数停留在定性分析的层面,少有做某一地区的产业融合度测算和关于影响机制的研究。基于此,本文以陕西省的装备制造业与生产性服务业为研究对象,从以下两个方面展开研究:首先,利用投入产出表中的影响力与感应度系数对两大产业间的关联关系进行分析,在此基础上采用灰色关联度方法对陕西省两大产业融合度水平进行测定,并分析陕西省两大产业融合过程中可能存在问题。其次,根据产业融合存在的问题,建立产业融合度的影响因素指标体系。利用主成分分析法将影响融合度的众多因素划分为三个主因子:融合的基础因素、融合的条件因素以及融合的环境因素,并结合多元线性回归模型分析这三个主因子对陕西省两大产业融合度的影响差异。研究结果显示:(1)融合的基础因素、融合的条件因素、融合的环境因素对两大产业的融合有正向推动作用。(2)三个主因子中融合的基础因素(即产业的技术创新水平、研发资金投入、专业人才储备)对融合度的影响是最大的,而装备制造业与生产性服务业在这几大方面存在不足,导致两大产业整体的融合水平不高。据此,文章对陕西省两大产业融合发展提出对策建议,即:提升产业关键共性技术的创新水平;积极储备专业技术人才;加大研发资金的投入;健全融合发展的政策与制度。
[Abstract]:As an intermediate input industry, the producer service industry provides advanced technology and supporting services for the production of equipment manufacturing industry, and provides postnatal marketing for the equipment manufacturing industry. Logistics, transportation, product support and other integrated services, reduce the manufacturing and transaction costs of equipment manufacturing enterprises, promote the transformation and upgrading of the industry; The increasing demand for producer services in the equipment manufacturing industry will improve the technological and service innovation level of producer services in order to better provide advanced technology and services for equipment manufacturing enterprises. The integration and development of equipment manufacturing and producer services can promote the transformation and upgrading of equipment manufacturing, promote the diversification and diversification of producer services, and at the same time bring more economic and social benefits to consumers. Most of the researches on the integration of the two industries have been carried out from the theoretical level, mainly on the development theory and the basic model of the integration of the two major industries. Research on the path of integration. In the course of the research, the factors affecting the integration of the two industries are involved, but most of them stay at the level of qualitative analysis. Based on this, this paper takes the equipment manufacturing industry and producer service industry in Shaanxi Province as the research object, and carries out the research from the following two aspects: first, Based on the analysis of the relationship between the two industries by using the influence and sensitivity coefficients in the input-output table, the level of financial integration between the two industries in Shaanxi Province is measured by using the grey correlation degree method. And analyzes the possible problems in the process of integration of the two major industries in Shaanxi Province. Secondly, according to the problems of industrial convergence, By using principal component analysis, many factors affecting the degree of financial integration are divided into three main factors: the basic factors of integration, the conditions of integration and the environmental factors of integration. Combined with the multivariate linear regression model, this paper analyzes the difference between the three main factors on the integration degree of the two major industries in Shaanxi Province. The results show that the basic factors and the conditions of the integration are the basic factors and the conditions of the integration of the two major industries in Shaanxi Province. Among the three main factors, the level of technological innovation, the investment of R & D, and the reserve of professional talents have the greatest influence on the degree of integration. However, the equipment manufacturing industry and producer service industry are deficient in these aspects, resulting in a low level of integration of the two industries as a whole. Accordingly, the paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for the integration and development of the two major industries in Shaanxi Province. That is, to improve the innovation level of key common technologies in industry; to actively reserve professional and technical personnel; to increase the investment of R & D funds; to improve the policies and systems of integration and development.
【学位授予单位】:山西财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F426;F719
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 崔莉;;基于VAR模型西部地区生产性服务业与制造业互动融合评价[J];学术论坛;2016年04期
2 陈俊红;孙明德;余军;;北京市乡村旅游产业融合度测算及影响因素分析[J];湖北农业科学;2016年09期
3 卢方元;常艳华;卢欣;;中国装备制造业R&D投入产出绩效分析——基于全国三次经济普查[J];工业技术经济;2016年04期
4 闻乃荻;綦良群;;知识密集型服务业与装备制造业互动融合过程及影响因素研究[J];科技与管理;2016年02期
5 李逢春;周子元;;生产性服务业对先进制造业的捕捉与匹配问题研究——基于反应与扩散模型的研究方法[J];南京财经大学学报;2015年06期
6 尹洪涛;;生产性服务业与制造业融合的主要价值增值点[J];管理学报;2015年08期
7 宁进;;中国装备制造业服务化转型的路径因子及其绩效实证[J];求索;2015年05期
8 綦良群;阚锴;;区域装备制造业与生产性服务业互动融合政策评估分析[J];哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版);2015年03期
9 林桂军;何武;;中国装备制造业在全球价值链的地位及升级趋势[J];国际贸易问题;2015年04期
10 王成东;綦良群;蔡渊渊;;装备制造业与生产性服务业融合影响因素研究[J];工业技术经济;2015年02期
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 朱海艳;旅游产业融合模式研究[D];西北大学;2014年
2 王成东;我国装备制造业与生产性服务业融合机理及保障策略研究[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2014年
3 姜睿清;基于产业融合的江西农业产业结构优化研究[D];南昌大学;2013年
4 杨仁发;生产性服务业发展、制造业竞争力与产业融合[D];南开大学;2013年
5 肖建勇;饭店产业融合的机理、路径与风险研究[D];华侨大学;2012年
6 单元媛;高技术产业融合成长研究[D];武汉理工大学;2010年
7 梁伟军;农业与相关产业融合发展研究[D];华中农业大学;2010年
8 郑明高;产业融合发展研究[D];北京交通大学;2010年
9 胡金星;产业融合的内在机制研究[D];复旦大学;2007年
10 胡永佳;产业融合的经济学分析[D];中共中央党校;2007年
,本文编号:1483579
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/wuliuguanlilunwen/1483579.html