互联网背景下我国再生资源典型回收模式比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 09:26

本文选题：互联网 + 再生资源　；参考：《北京物资学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,再生资源产业对我国国民经济和环境保护的贡献作用越来越凸显。但不可否认,高效的再生资源回收方式是保证这一产业健康快速发展的关键,而研究发现,目前我国再生资源主要回收方式仍集中在以低效率的传统人流、物流等信息资源整合方式下的人工回收,其回收价格不透明、回收过程监管难、安全漏洞大等问题较多;当前背景下,互联网的快速发展使我国众多产业面临变革,这在再生资源领域主要表现为新出现的以网络平台为手段的互联网回收模式,其回收方式在回收效率、安全监管、回收价格、发展潜力等方面较传统回收方式表现出更多的优势。因此,本文主要选取了当前互联网背景下再生资源回收领域新出现的O2O、B2C两种典型回收模式,并结合具体的企业案例,根据层次分析法,构造用户接受程度,回收过程控制,具体回收效果三维度评价体系对两种回收模式的特点、适用性等具体实践效果做出比较研究,以对其实际效用及发展潜力进行评价。研究发现,O2O回收模式下,其回收方式人性化、回收品种多元化、回收价格吸引力强等优势突出,网络回收平台操作简便,趣味性高,用户对此接受程度较高;但O2O网络回收平台功能单一,线上回收监管过程缺乏有力技术支撑,回收商集体竞价可靠程度较低,线下回收交易成本较高,回收处理体系建设较为困难等使其回收过程控制较差;具体回收效果方面,由于其目标群体主要为个体投废者,回收品种量小且分散,末端处理等节能减排效果较差,综合实践效果一般,但由于其用户群体潜力巨大,回收范围广泛,未来具备多品种、宽领域再生资源回收的普遍推广;B2C回收模式下,其回收方式、品种较为单一,网络平台操作不便、平台趣味性低等使用户对此接受程度较低;但其回收平台独立功能强大,大数据管理实现回收过程高效监管,交易价格指数规范使回收价格透明可靠,线下配套处理体系完善,线下回收交易成本较低等使其回收过程控制较好;具体回收效果方面,由于其智能回收技术对产品的标准化程度要求较高,使其回收品种较为单一,但针对各类中间商的批量化回收和专业化处理,使其末端处理量、节能减排效果显著,综合实践效果较好,但目前暂不适合多品种、宽领域再生资源回收的普遍推广。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the contribution of renewable resource industry to national economy and environmental protection has become more and more prominent. However, it is undeniable that efficient recycling of renewable resources is the key to ensure the healthy and rapid development of this industry. However, the study found that the main recycling methods of renewable resources in China are still concentrated in the traditional flow of people with low efficiency. Under the integrated mode of logistics and other information resources, the recovery price is not transparent, the recycling process is difficult to supervise, the security loopholes are large, etc. Under the current background, the rapid development of the Internet makes many industries in our country face the change. In the field of renewable resources, this is mainly manifested in the emerging Internet recycling mode based on network platform, in which recycling efficiency, safety supervision, and price recovery are the main ways of recycling. Development potential and other aspects than the traditional way of recycling shows more advantages. Therefore, this paper mainly selects two typical recycling models of O2OB2C, which are emerging in the field of renewable resource recovery under the current Internet background, and combines with specific enterprise cases, constructs the user acceptance degree and recycling process control according to the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In order to evaluate the actual utility and development potential of the two kinds of recycling models, the three-dimensional degree evaluation system makes a comparative study on the characteristics and applicability of the two models. It is found that under the mode of O2O recovery, the recycling mode is humanized, the variety of recovery is diversified, the price of recovery is attractive and so on, the network recovery platform is easy to operate and has high interest, and the user has a high degree of acceptance of it. However, the recovery platform of O2O network has a single function, lack of strong technical support in the process of on-line recycling supervision, low reliability of collective bidding by recyclers, and high transaction cost of off-line recycling. The construction of recycling treatment system is difficult to control the recovery process. In the specific recovery effect, because the target group is mainly individual scrap, the quantity of recovered varieties is small and dispersed, the effect of energy saving and emission reduction such as terminal treatment is poor. The comprehensive practice effect is general, but because its user group potential is huge, the scope of recycling is wide, in the future, there are many varieties, wide range of renewable resources recycling universal promotion of B2C recycling mode, its recycling mode, variety is relatively single, The network platform is inconvenient to operate, and the platform is not interesting enough to make users accept it, but the recovery platform has strong independent function, big data manages and implements the efficient supervision of the recycling process, and the standard of transaction price index makes the recovery price transparent and reliable. Off-line matching treatment system is perfect, and offline recycling transaction cost is low, so that the recycling process is controlled better. In the specific recovery effect, the intelligent recycling technology requires high standardization of products, which makes the variety of recycling relatively single. But the batch recovery and specialized treatment for various kinds of middlemen make their terminal treatment amount, energy saving and emission reduction remarkable, and the comprehensive practice effect is better. But at present, it is not suitable for the general promotion of recycling of renewable resources in many varieties and wide fields.
【学位授予单位】：北京物资学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F713.2

【参考文献】