基于理性决策模型的政府投资非经营性工程项目建设模式比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-18 09:41

本文选题：代建制 + 政府工程　；参考：《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》2010年12期

【摘要】：近年来中国在政府投资非经营性工程项目领域推行了以代建制为方向的改革。为了评价市场代建制模式、政府代建制模式以及传统建设模式三者之间的优劣,本研究借助理性预期理论,构建了以项目管理专业人员(PM)的目标选择机制为核心的理性决策模型,用于衡量PM在面临公众利益与项目业主个人利益的冲突时将做何选择,并通过比较3种不同建设模式对PM各项决策成本的理性预期的不同影响,得到了在同样具备外部监督有效、项目管理人员面临的惩罚是真实的和项目管理专业人员真正具备工程项目管理的专业素质等3大前提条件下,政府代建制模式优于市场代建模式,而两者又都优于传统模式的结论,为进一步明确政府投资非经营性工程项目代建制改革方向提供了参考。
[Abstract]:In recent years, China has carried out reforms in the field of government-invested non-operational projects. In order to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the market agent system model, the government agent system model and the traditional construction mode, this study is based on the theory of rational expectation. A rational decision-making model based on the target selection mechanism of project management professionals (PMPM) is constructed to measure how PM will choose when facing the conflict between the public interest and the individual interests of the project owner. By comparing the different influences of three different construction modes on the rational expectation of PM decision-making cost, we get that the external supervision is effective in the same way. The punishment faced by the project managers is that the government agent system model is superior to the market agent construction model under the three preconditions of being true and the project management professionals really possess the professional quality of project management. The conclusion that both of them are superior to the traditional mode provides a reference for further clarifying the direction of government investment in the construction system of non-operational engineering projects.
【作者单位】：清华大学建设管理系;
【基金】：“十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAJ01B04-03)
【分类号】：F283;F224

【参考文献】