PW公司绩效考核体系优化策略研究
发布时间:2018-11-05 16:54
【摘要】:PW公司是国内一家著名的水处理公司,其公司规模在行业内也首屈一指,因该公司历来重视项目管理体系的建设,再加上该公司的企业文化为“寓艺于工”,对工程质量异常重视,所以在项目质量、项目进度以及客户满意度方面在行业内有非常高的声誉。但长期以来,公司对项目的成本以及利润率控制效果不佳,公司的竞争力严重受损。另外,在绩效考核方面,公司一直使用统一的适用于公司全体员工的考核体系,缺乏对项目团队进行有针对性的考核体系,导致了项目团队成员工作效率不高、为了完成任务不计成本及缺乏激励等问题的产生。本文认为,PW公司这样的水处理企业,因业务模式以EPC项目的形式进行,所以必须要制定适合EPC项目团队的考核方法,在考核体系的优化过程中,采取定量的考核办法,各个项目团队以降低成本和提高项目的净利润率作为主要考核指标,将这两项的考核结果直接与奖励挂钩。另外,针对项目各个子团队的特殊性,分别制定相应的定性的考核办法,引导和规范项目成员在项目中表现。本文首先阐述了绩效考核及EPC项目管理方面的国内外相关研究成果,之后,介绍了PW公司的基本情况及考核体系现状,指出了存在的主要问题如原有考核体系笼统、静态及不全面等,分析其产生原因在于原有体系没有考虑到项目团队的运作考核,另外,原有企业文化过度倚重质量而缺乏对成本控制的考核。根据分析成因,结合项目范围管理及集成项目管理理论,有针对性的进行了改进和增加了项目团队的考核体系。希望本文的研究对水处理企业进行项目团队考核时有所参考。
[Abstract]:PW Company is a famous water treatment company in China, its scale is also the first in the industry, because the company has always attached importance to the construction of project management system, and the company's corporate culture is "combining art with industry". Great emphasis on engineering quality, so has a high reputation in the industry in terms of project quality, project schedule and customer satisfaction. But for a long time, the cost and profit margin of the project have not been well controlled, and the competitiveness of the company has been seriously damaged. In addition, in the aspect of performance appraisal, the company has been using a unified assessment system applicable to all the employees of the company, and the lack of a targeted appraisal system for the project team has led to the inefficient work of the members of the project team. In order to complete the task regardless of cost and lack of incentives and other issues arising. This paper holds that water treatment enterprises such as PW, because the business model is carried out in the form of EPC project, must formulate the examination method suitable for the EPC project team, and adopt the quantitative assessment method in the process of optimizing the appraisal system. Each project team takes the cost reduction and the net profit rate of the project as the main evaluation index, and directly links the results of these two items to the reward. In addition, according to the particularity of each sub-team of the project, the corresponding qualitative assessment methods are developed to guide and standardize the performance of the project members in the project. This paper first describes the research results of performance appraisal and EPC project management at home and abroad, then introduces the basic situation of PW company and the current situation of the evaluation system, points out the main problems such as the original evaluation system is general. Static and incomplete, the reason is that the original system does not take into account the operation of the project team, in addition, the original corporate culture is too dependent on quality and lack of assessment of cost control. According to the analysis of the causes, combined with the project scope management and integrated project management theory, targeted improvement and increase of the project team assessment system. I hope the study of this paper for water treatment enterprises in the project team assessment of reference.
【学位授予单位】:华东理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F272.92;F299.24
本文编号:2312703
[Abstract]:PW Company is a famous water treatment company in China, its scale is also the first in the industry, because the company has always attached importance to the construction of project management system, and the company's corporate culture is "combining art with industry". Great emphasis on engineering quality, so has a high reputation in the industry in terms of project quality, project schedule and customer satisfaction. But for a long time, the cost and profit margin of the project have not been well controlled, and the competitiveness of the company has been seriously damaged. In addition, in the aspect of performance appraisal, the company has been using a unified assessment system applicable to all the employees of the company, and the lack of a targeted appraisal system for the project team has led to the inefficient work of the members of the project team. In order to complete the task regardless of cost and lack of incentives and other issues arising. This paper holds that water treatment enterprises such as PW, because the business model is carried out in the form of EPC project, must formulate the examination method suitable for the EPC project team, and adopt the quantitative assessment method in the process of optimizing the appraisal system. Each project team takes the cost reduction and the net profit rate of the project as the main evaluation index, and directly links the results of these two items to the reward. In addition, according to the particularity of each sub-team of the project, the corresponding qualitative assessment methods are developed to guide and standardize the performance of the project members in the project. This paper first describes the research results of performance appraisal and EPC project management at home and abroad, then introduces the basic situation of PW company and the current situation of the evaluation system, points out the main problems such as the original evaluation system is general. Static and incomplete, the reason is that the original system does not take into account the operation of the project team, in addition, the original corporate culture is too dependent on quality and lack of assessment of cost control. According to the analysis of the causes, combined with the project scope management and integrated project management theory, targeted improvement and increase of the project team assessment system. I hope the study of this paper for water treatment enterprises in the project team assessment of reference.
【学位授予单位】:华东理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F272.92;F299.24
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 牛江伟;;绩效考核基本理论探析[J];商业经济;2006年02期
2 韩伯棠,尚赞娣;人力资源绩效评估方法的比较与选择[J];科技管理研究;2002年06期
3 于敬;;浅谈企业员工绩效考核的作用[J];科技信息;2010年16期
4 章凯;激励理论新解[J];科学管理研究;2003年02期
5 陈凡;沈江;;EPC建设项目下总承包商的成本控制研究[J];内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年05期
6 李传裕;;基于战略人力资源管理的绩效管理策略[J];企业经济;2009年07期
7 刘志华;;EPC项目进度测量系统及应用[J];石油工程建设;2006年05期
8 葛莉;;战略执行中的沟通[J];中国人力资源开发;2005年05期
,本文编号:2312703
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/xiangmuguanli/2312703.html