《说苑》与《世说新语》叙事比较研究
发布时间:2018-04-28 20:08
本文选题:《说苑》 + 《世说新语》 ; 参考:《西北民族大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:《说苑》和《世说新语》作为叙事文学发展历程中不可或缺的重要存在,在叙事艺术的诸多方面都有很多相似点。虽然两者的相似性在不同程度上得到了学术界的认可,但对于二者叙事的比较研究,目前还止于一些零散片面的感性评价,并没有系统条理的分析论述。本文旨在通过对《说苑》和《世说新语》的文本进行深入比较分析,力求更全面地探究二者在叙事艺术方面的渊源关系。论文首先梳理了《说苑》和《世说新语》的研究概况,理清前人的研究成就及其不足之处,提出研究的理论意义和研究中拟解决的问题;接着对比两书的叙事结构,认为《说苑》分门别类的叙事体例直接影响了《世说新语》,并对这种体例追本溯源,缕清其发展轨迹;然后对两书的叙事方式进行对比,《说苑》和《世说新语》都是在借鉴采撷前人典籍的基础上,根据各自表达需要对原材料重作艺术加工处理而重新编纂以成书的,《世说新语》继承了《说苑》在故事叙述技法上的特色:注重故事情节的完整性和曲折性、追求历史真实与艺术真实的完美结合;对比两书人物形象的刻画,《世说新语》全面借鉴学习了《说苑》的人物塑造方法,两书都采用对比描写、细节描写、典型言行刻画、心理描写、截取日常生活片段、利用矛盾冲突等手法来勾勒雕琢人物。除此之外,《世说新语》还沿用了《说苑》人物塑造的"互见法",用多个章节或片段倾力描摹同一人物,力求形象饱满全面;对比两书叙事语言艺术,两书叙事都是以记言为主,《世说新语》充分承袭了《说苑》的言说方式,且在语言艺术方面表现出人物语言个性化、用典、口语化等共同特征。通过以上几个方面的比较研究可以得出结论:《说苑》与《世说新语》在叙事艺术上存在极深的渊源,《说苑》对《世说新语》的叙事艺术有着深远的影响。
[Abstract]:As an indispensable and important existence in the development of narrative literature, there are many similarities in many aspects of narrative art. Although the similarity between the two has been recognized by the academic community in varying degrees, the comparative study of the two narratives is still limited to some piecemeal and one-sided perceptual evaluation, and there is no systematic analysis and argumentation. The purpose of this paper is to make a thorough comparative analysis of the texts of Shuiyuan and Shi Shuo Xinyu in order to explore the relationship between them in the narrative art in a more comprehensive way. The thesis firstly combs the research situation of Shuiyuan and Shiyaoxingyu, clarifies the achievements and shortcomings of the predecessors, puts forward the theoretical significance of the research and the problems to be solved in the research, and then compares the narrative structure of the two books. The author thinks that the narrative style of "Shuiyuan" has a direct influence on "Shi Shuo Xin Yu", and traces the origin of this style and makes its development track clear. Then the narrative methods of the two books are compared. "Shuiyuan" and "Shi Shuo Xin Yu" are all based on drawing on the books of predecessors. According to the need to reprocess the raw materials and recompile them into a book according to their respective expressions, "Shi Shuo Xin Yu" inherits the characteristics of "Shuoyuan" in narrative techniques: paying attention to the integrity and tortuosity of the story plot, Pursuing the perfect combination of historical reality and artistic truth, comparing the portrayal of the characters in the two books, "Shi Shuo Xin Yu" has learned the character shaping method of "Shuoyuan" comprehensively, the two books have adopted the comparative description, the detail description, the typical words and deeds portray, the two books have adopted the contrast description, the detail description, the typical words and deeds portrays, Psychological description, the interception of daily life fragments, the use of contradictions and conflicts to outline the character. In addition, Shi Shuo Xin Yu has also adopted the "seeing each other" method of portraying the characters of the "Shuoyuan" character, using multiple chapters or fragments to portray the same character in an effort to achieve a full and comprehensive image; and contrasting the art of the narrative language between the two books. The two narratives are mainly written in words, and the New words of Shi Shuo are fully inherited from the way of saying the words of Shuiyuan, and they show the common characteristics of personage language individuation, use of allusions and colloquial language in the aspect of language art. Through the comparative study of the above several aspects, we can draw a conclusion: there is a deep origin in narrative art between "Shuiyuan" and "Shi Shuo Xin Yu", and the "Shuiyuan" has a profound influence on the narrative art of "Shi Shuo Xin Yu".
【学位授予单位】:西北民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I207.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 尹自永;;刘向经学思想研究述略[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
2 周蔚;刘向小说艺术成就浅论[J];苏州大学学报;2004年03期
3 孟之;开志人小说之先河的刘向[J];历史教学;1997年11期
4 杨义;;汉魏六朝“世说体”小说的流变[J];中国社会科学;1991年04期
5 李岩;《说苑》的比喻[J];新疆师范大学学报(社会科学版);1986年01期
6 刘松来;《史记》“互见法”初探[J];江西师范大学学报;1984年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 张斌妮;刘向《说苑》研究[D];陕西师范大学;2011年
2 谢祥娟;《说苑》的成书及其文学价值[D];曲阜师范大学;2009年
3 贾冬月;论刘向的三部书与小说的关系[D];曲阜师范大学;2007年
4 刘琳霞;刘向《说苑》考论[D];河南大学;2006年
5 李柏;《世说新语》人物形象研究[D];东北师范大学;2005年
6 高月;刘向《说苑》研究三题[D];西南师范大学;2004年
7 王秀红;《世说新语》叙事研究[D];西北师范大学;2003年
,本文编号:1816687
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/1816687.html