当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 古代文学论文 >

梅曾亮新论

发布时间:2018-08-01 08:43
【摘要】:梅曾亮是嘉、道时期桐城派著名的古文家,为姚鼐四大弟子之一。本论文在前人研究成果的基础上,力求有所创新和拓展,避免陈陈相因。本文从三个不同的角度(1、母教;2、东亚儒学;3、《惜抱轩尺牍》)展开论述,深入开掘,广泛征引,力图展现梅曾亮与海内外文学之关系,由此形成了三个相应的专题研究。一、梅曾亮与母亲侯芝。侯芝性喜翰墨,具有较高的文艺素养,是当时有名的诗媛以及弹词编订家。梅氏家学深厚,尤以数学、历法见长。梅曾亮少时聪慧颖悟,文性颇佳,深得祖父、伯父、舅氏、父执等人的称许。在梅曾亮青少年时期,其父梅冲赴京备考,长期未归,因此教子的重任就落在了母亲侯芝的身上。侯芝在辛勤劳作之余,孜孜不倦地课子读书,为梅曾亮的成长与成才奠定了坚实的基础。侯芝在教育儿子的过程中,注重严慈相济,而以严为主,并勉励其子要志存高远,力追古时名贤。她在中晚年时期,致力于弹词小说的改编与创作,取得了一定的成就,并推动了清代女性弹词小说的进一步发展。二、梅曾亮与东亚儒学。大宰纯(1679-1747),是日本江户时代(1603-1867)中期著名的儒学家。他晚年撰有《论语古训外传》一书,对日本学界有着十分重要的影响。他去世后,这部著作流传至朝鲜,立刻引起了朝鲜学者的极大震惊。金迈淳(1776-1840),是朝鲜的内阁学士兼著名文人,他对太宰纯之书进行了猛烈的抨击。太宰纯崇尚孔子和先王之道,而不满于宋儒理学和孟子,他在《论语古训外传》一书中对朱熹提出了严厉的批评。金迈淳则尊崇朱子,奉之为圭臬,并认为朱子与孔孟是一脉相承的儒学体系。在斥朱与尊朱的问题上,二人形成了尖锐的对立和论争。两人学术观点的对立,导源于各自师说家法的差异,也折射出同在东亚汉文化圈中的日、朝两国学术风气与治学取径的异质与殊途。在论争中,梅曾亮支持金迈淳,而贬抑太宰纯,并斥之为“异端之尤”。三、梅曾亮与《惜抱轩尺牍》。《惜抱轩尺牍》是姚鼐致亲友、弟子、故旧以及后进的信札。这些尺牍真实而具体地反映了姚鼐与他们之间交往的各种状况,具有较高的学术价值和文献价值。通过这些尺牍以及其他相关材料,我们可以看出,在姚鼐的心目中,他特别称赏的弟子主要有四人:管同、张聪咸、刘开、方东树。这四位高足在他心目中的地位并不相同,而有轻重主次之别。姚鼐与江西新城两大望族——陈氏以及鲁氏有着密切的交往,而来自于陈氏家族的陈用光则是姚鼐颇为器重的弟子,也是他晚年精心栽培、倾力陶铸的一位干练之才。陈用光在弘扬师说、纠正衰颓的文风和士风、团结同道以及奖掖后进等方面发挥了重要的作用,堪称“姚门中枢”。梅曾亮在评价《惜抱轩尺牍》时,认为此书关于论学论文的宗旨,与姚鼐文集中的古文是互相呼应和生发的,亦即尺牍与古文“微显互证”、互为表里。同时他也指出,相信姚鼐之学的学者并不多,可谓曲高和寡,信从者稀。
[Abstract]:Mei Cengliang is a famous ancient prose writer of the Tongcheng school in the Dao period, one of the four major disciples of Yao. On the basis of the research achievements of the predecessors, this paper strives for innovation and expansion to avoid Chen's cause. This article starts from three different angles (1, mother education, 2, East Asian Confucianism; 3, "Yu Bao Xuan" Du Du). The relationship between Mei Zeng Liang and literature at home and abroad has formed three corresponding special studies. First, Mei Zeng Liang and his mother Hou Zhi Hou Zhi Yan Han ink, with high literary and artistic accomplishment, are the famous poetry yuan and the editor of the spring editor. Grandfather, uncle, uncle, paternal and others commended. During Mei Cengliang's youth, his father, Mei Chong went to Beijing to prepare for the examination, and had not returned to Beijing for a long time. Therefore, the responsibility of the teaching son fell on his mother, Hou Zhi. After his hard work, Hou Zhi laid a solid foundation for the success and success of Mei Cengliang. In the course of the process, we should pay more attention to the strength of mercy, and give priority to it, and encourage his son to have high aspirations and pursue ancient times. In her middle and late years, she devoted herself to the adaptation and creation of the novel, and promoted the further development of the female Ci novels of the Qing Dynasty. Two, Mei Zeng Liang and East Asian Confucianism. Da Zai pure (1679-1747), the Japanese River The famous Confucian scholar in the middle of the household (1603-1867). He wrote a book on the ancient language of the Analects of Confucius in his later years. He had a very important influence on the Japanese academic circles. After his death, this book was spread to Korea, which immediately shocked the Korean scholars. Jin maumu (1776-1840), a Bachelor of cabinet and famous literati in North Korea, he entered the book of pure Zai. It was a violent attack. Tai Zai was a pure advocate of Confucius and the king of the king, and was dissatisfied with song Confucianism and Meng Zi. He put forward severe criticism on Zhu Xi in the book of the Analects of Confucius. Jin Maochun respected Zhu Xi, regarded it as the standard, and believed that Zhu Xi and Kong Meng were the same Confucian system. On the issue of rebuking Zhu and Zun Zhu, the two human form There is a sharp opposition and controversy. The opposition of the two people's academic views derives from the differences between their own teachers and the family law. It also reflects the difference and the distinction between the academic and scholarly ways of the two countries in the East Asian Han culture circle. In the debate, Mei Zeng supported Jin Meishan, and he denounced Tai Zai pure, and reprimanded it as "the special end". Three, Mei Cengliang The bamboo and wooden bamboo and wooden tablets of "cherish Hun Xuan" are the letters of Yao's relatives, disciples, old and backward, which reflect the various conditions of communication between Yao and them, which are of high academic value and literature value. Through these documents and other related materials, we can see that Yao's mind is in the mind. There are four main disciples of his special praise: Guan Tong, Zhang Congxian, Liu Kai, Fang Dong tree. The four high feet are not the same in his mind, but the difference between the heavy and heavy. Yao is closely related to the two great people of the Jiangxi new town, Chen's and Lu's, and the Chen Yongguang from the Chen family is highly valued by Yao. The disciple, who was also a very skilled person who had been carefully cultivated in his late years, has played an important role in carrying forward the teacher's saying, correcting the decline of the style and the morale, the unity of the same way as well as the award and telltale, which is called "the center of Yao Men". Mei Zeng liang thought the book about the purpose of the study paper and Yao when he evaluated the bamboo slips of. At the same time, he also points out that there are not many scholars who believe in Yao's learning.
【学位授予单位】:南京大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:I206.2


本文编号:2157017

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/2157017.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户838a9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com