由“普夏之争”论普实克文学研究的科学化路径及其理论价值

发布时间：2018-08-13 20:00

【摘要】：普夏论争的焦点在于文学研究是否属于科学研究。普实克认为文学研究是科学研究之一种,而夏志清则否认文学研究的科学性。普实克在具体的文学研究实践中为我们提供了文学研究的三个科学化路径:第一,文学研究的目的是发现客观真理;第二,文学研究的态度是克服个人偏见;第三,文学研究的方法是历史视角和系统分析。从此路径出发,普实克力图系统而科学地演绎中国现代文学发生的历史过程,并在纷繁的历史表象中寻绎出一条清晰明了的发展线索。他的建基于科学研究视野上的文学研究方法论,为其中国现代文学研究提供了持续而有效的支持,使其能够以独到的眼光发现并提出许多深具启发性的论题,深刻影响了20世纪末期以后的中国现代文学研究的发展历程。
[Abstract]:The focus of the Puxia debate is whether literary research belongs to scientific research. Pushick holds that literary research is one of the scientific studies, while Xia Zhiqing denies the scientific nature of literary research. In his specific practice of literary research, Pushick provides us with three scientific approaches to literary research: first, the purpose of literary research is to discover the objective truth; secondly, the attitude of literary research is to overcome personal prejudice; third, The method of literature research is historical perspective and systematic analysis. From this point of view, Pushick tries hard to systematically and scientifically deduce the historical process of Chinese modern literature and find a clear clue in the complicated historical appearance. His methodology, which is based on the perspective of scientific research, provides continuous and effective support for his study of modern Chinese literature and enables him to discover and raise many enlightening topics with a unique vision. It has deeply influenced the development course of Chinese modern literature research since the end of the 20th century.
【作者单位】：安徽大学学报编辑部;
【基金】：安徽大学博士科研启动经费资助项目“结构主义视域下普实克中国现代文学研究”(J01001319)
【分类号】：I206.6

【相似文献】