当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 古代文学论文 >

《传奇汇考》文献研究

发布时间:2018-09-11 20:28
【摘要】:在众多的中国古代戏曲专科目录中,叙录体目录仅有极少数几部(如《录鬼簿》、《传奇汇考》、《今乐考证》等),《传奇汇考》以其庞大的著录规模,丰富的著录内容和相对完备的著录体例颇引人注目。《传奇汇考》共收集了265种杂剧、传奇曲目的相关资料,其中包括20种杂剧和245种传奇曲目。它是我国古代戏曲专科目录编撰史上卷帙相当浩繁,内容极为详明的叙录体目录之一,具有集大成的特性,堪称“扛鼎之作”,后人常以之比《四库全书总目》。《传奇汇考》着眼于考证剧情本事,穷其原委,考其源流,并大量征引历史资料,指明剧作情节与历史记载内容之出入,征引资料涉及小说、笔记、话本、史书等无所不包,不仅有利于我们“辨章学术,考镜源流”,具有重要的史料研究价值,而且还具有不可替代的文献学价值、戏曲史价值和文化史价值等。关于《传奇汇考》的编纂者、编撰年代以及剧目来源等学界仍存在争议,其所著录的版本状况相当复杂,存在抄本、刻本、评点本、重订本等多种版本,同时不同版本所收剧目提要数量不一,而且其中差错、脱漏满纸。目前国内流传颇广、最为常见、易见的是1994年书目文献出版社据1914年古今书室刊本影印出版的版本。本文所用即为此本。由于很多版本流散于海内外图书馆和私人藏家,这就给研究的深入造成很大的难度。本篇论文通过全面整理现有相关资料,对《传奇汇考》进行系统的分析和研究,主要包括《传奇汇考》的编纂、版本与流传,《传奇汇考》的著录形式以及《传奇汇考》的价值与不足三部分。同时,《传奇汇考》虽称目录之书,但其既无分类亦无索引,编排随意且不讲究,难于检索,不便使用。因此本文在附录部分对其进行补充说明,具体包括《传奇汇考》的目录索引、《传奇汇考》与《曲海总目提要》作者著录异同表、《传奇汇考》引书索引以及《传奇汇考》与《曲海总目提要》校比辑录四部分内容。一方面,通过目录索引,使《传奇汇考》便于检索使用;另一方面,通过系统的分析,让读者对《传奇汇考》有整体、理论性的认识与了解。
[Abstract]:Among the numerous specialties of ancient Chinese opera, there are only a few of them (such as "Ghost Book", "Legend Hui examination", "textual Research of Today's Music", etc.). The abundant description and relatively complete description style are quite remarkable. The collection of 265 kinds of zaju and the relevant materials of legendary repertoire include 20 kinds of zaju and 245 kinds of legendary repertoire. It is one of the great volumes in the history of the specialized catalogue of ancient Chinese operas, and it is one of the most detailed catalogs in the history of narration. It has the characteristics of collection, and it can be called "carrying the tripod as a work". Later generations often compared to the general contents of the Siku-Quan book. The "Legend Collection examination" focuses on the textual research of the plot, its origin, and draws a large number of historical materials, pointing out the differences between the plot of the play and the contents of historical records, and referring to the material that relates to the novel. Notes, texts, history books and so on are not only beneficial to us, but also have important research value of historical materials, and also have irreplaceable value of philology, drama history and cultural history, and so on. There are still controversies about the compilers, the compilation age and the source of the repertoire, and the situation of the versions of the books is quite complicated, and there are many versions, such as transcripts, inscriptions, comments, revises, and so on. At the same time, the number of different versions of the repertoire received is different, and one of the errors, full of missing paper. At present the domestic circulation is quite wide, the most common, easy to see is the 1994 bibliography literature publishing house according to 1914 ancient and modern book room edition photocopy publication edition. The use of this article is for this purpose. Because many editions are scattered in libraries and private collectors at home and abroad, this makes the research very difficult. Through the comprehensive collation of the existing relevant data, this paper makes a systematic analysis and research on "legendary Hui examination", mainly including the compilation of "legendary Hui examination". There are three parts: edition and circulation, the description form of Legend Hui examination and the value and deficiency of Legend Hui examination. At the same time, although the book is called the book of catalogue, it has neither classification nor index, is arranged freely and does not pay attention to, is difficult to search, inconvenient to use. Therefore, in the appendix part of this paper, the supplementary explanation is given. It includes the catalogue index of legendary Hui examination, the table of similarities and differences of author's description between Legend Hui examination and Quhai General catalogue, the index of the quoted book of legendary Hui examination, and the contents of four parts of the comparison between the legendary Hui examination and the Quhai General catalogue. On the one hand, through the index of catalogue, it is easy to search and use, on the other hand, through systematic analysis, readers can have a whole and theoretical understanding of "legendary Hui examination".
【学位授予单位】:山西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I207.37

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王文君;;南京图书馆藏丁氏八千卷楼抄本《传奇汇考》考论[J];文献;2016年06期

2 石芳;;《传奇汇考》作者考辨[J];浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版);2016年03期

3 李庆;;两种日本现存《传奇汇考》抄本考[J];文化遗产;2010年03期

4 孙书磊;;《书舶庸谭》所载日藏中国戏曲文献考略[J];戏曲研究;2006年02期

5 杜海军;;《曲海总目》有别本——论《重订曲海总目》非对《扬州画舫录》载《曲海目》的重订[J];中国典籍与文化;2006年01期

6 陆萼庭;读《曲海总目提要》札记[J];文学遗产;2003年01期

7 淮茗;;董康和他的《曲海总目提要》[J];博览群书;2002年03期

8 徐永明;管庭芬未曾重订《曲海总目》[J];中国典籍与文化;2001年02期

9 蒋寅;;东瀛读书记[J];文献;1999年01期

10 邓长风;《书舶庸谭》中的戏曲史料二题美国国会图书馆读书札记之三十七[J];铁道师院学报;1997年03期



本文编号:2237766

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/2237766.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d417f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com