文学批评中作家“创作谈”的合法性问题

发布时间：2018-09-12 06:14

【摘要】：对于创作谈的重视本来是正常的现象,但是,近年来出现了一种不良的倾向,不妨将其称为文学批评中的“创作谈”崇拜情结,或者“创作谈”泛滥现象。这种现象在文学生产与传播的各个层面都有鲜明的表现。批评家在解读文学作品时,一方面将作家的创作谈视为重要线索和重要依据;另一方面,也常常将创作谈上升至价值评判的最高旨归。这种现象对文学批评自身的伤害,首先表现为过分倚重当时作家本人的“证词”作用,盲目夸大作家创作谈的真实性,使文学批评陷入了“证人的记忆”效应或窠臼。其次表现为思想与理论上强大的牵引力。这种伤害从本质上导致的是批评主体性让渡的问题。文学批评中的作家创作谈,在“证词”和“标准”两个层面上都不具备合法性。只有打破“自传契约”,克服创作谈崇拜情结,才能最大程度地唤回文学批评的主体性和创造本质。
[Abstract]:It is normal to attach importance to creation talk, but in recent years, there has been a bad tendency to call it "creation talk" adoration complex in literary criticism, or "creation talk" overflowing phenomenon. This kind of phenomenon has the distinct manifestation in the literature production and the dissemination each level. In interpreting literary works, critics on the one hand regard the writer's creation as an important clue and important basis, on the other hand, often elevate the discussion of creation to the highest aim of value judgment. This kind of phenomenon hurts the literary criticism itself firstly by relying too much on the "testimony" of the writer at that time, blindly exaggerating the authenticity of the writer's creation, and making the literary criticism fall into the "witness's memory" effect or stereotype. The second performance is the strong traction of thought and theory. The nature of this injury is the issue of the transfer of criticism. The writer's creation in literary criticism does not have legitimacy at the two levels of testimony and standard. Only by breaking the autobiographical contract and overcoming the complex of creation and worship can the subjectivity and creative nature of literary criticism be called back to the greatest extent.
【作者单位】：南京大学中国新文学研究中心;
【分类号】：I206.7

【相似文献】