毛氏父子对《三国志演义》的“比类而观”及其“重复”理论的现代意义

发布时间：2018-09-13 10:49

【摘要】：毛纶、毛宗岗父子凭着"比类而观"对《三国志演义》之"重复"叙事进行了较全面的识辨和阐释,提出了"相反而相因""不相反而相因""相类而相因""不相类而相因"等相互关联的形态,我们可将其归纳为"相类而相似""相类而相异""相类而相反"三种。在毛氏父子看来,这三种"重复"叙事形态能够涉笔成趣,既拥有"遥遥相对""遥相呼应"等结构功能,又具备"相映""变化""奇妙"等审美效果。另外,毛氏父子也能从因果观念上对小说"重复"叙事的衍生意蕴予以阐释。较当今由美国解构主义文论家米勒提出而风行于西方的"重复"等理论,毛氏父子的"重复"理论早了数百年,期待通过整合、激活以发扬光大。二者在源于各自传统、立足于经典文本、重视结构功能等方面可以形成跨时空镜照。我们应通过取长补短使之服务于当今中西合璧的文论建设。
[Abstract]:Mao Lun and Mao Zonggang's father and son made a more comprehensive identification and interpretation of the narration of "repetition" in the Romance of the three Kingdoms by means of the comparison of categories. In this paper, we put forward the interrelated forms of "opposite and cause," not cause, "and" cause and cause, "which can be classified as" similar and similar, "similar", "different", "similar", "opposite", and "different", "similar", "different" and "opposite". In the view of Mao's father and son, these three kinds of "repetition" narrative forms can be interesting, with the structural functions of "distant relative" and "distant echo", as well as aesthetic effects such as "reflecting", "changing", "wonderful" and so on. In addition, Mao's father and son can explain the derivative meaning of the novel's "repetition" narration from the concept of causality. Compared with the theories of "repetition" put forward by American deconstructionist literary theorist Hans Muller and popular in the West, Mao's and his son's theory of "repetition" are hundreds of years earlier, and they expect to carry forward through integration and activation. Both of them can form cross-temporal mirror in aspects of their tradition, classical text, structure and function. We should learn from each other and make it serve the construction of modern Chinese and western literary theory.
【作者单位】：上海财经大学人文学院;
【基金】：教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”项目“中国传统小说互文性研究”(项目编号:NCET-12-0905)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I207.413

【二级参考文献】