基于砂箱模型试验的肋板式挡土墙稳定性及破坏模式研究
[Abstract]:The supporting structure is an important part of the geotechnical engineering. With the rapid development of the economic construction and the infrastructure of our country, it has put forward a higher requirement for the support structure under the complex geological conditions, and many kinds of light supporting structures, such as the anchoring technology, the reinforced earth technology, the cantilever structure and the combined structure, are widely used. The rib-type retaining wall is a new type of supporting structure composed of a wall panel, a rib plate and a soil body between the rib plates, and the soil pressure acting on the panel is balanced by the friction between the rib of the soil body extending into the stable region and the rib plate. The method is mainly characterized in that the self-stability of the soil body after the wall is fully utilized, the soil disturbance of the side slope is small, the bearing capacity of the foundation bearing is not high, the structure is simple, and the like. At present, the stress deformation characteristics, the failure mode and the stability mechanism of the rib-type retaining wall are not clear, and the corresponding design calculation method is not established. Based on the summary and analysis of the existing retaining wall research results, the influence factors of the paper flexible panel rib plate retaining wall model and the plate type rib plate retaining wall model of the plexiglass rigid panel rib plate type retaining wall model are investigated through the indoor small sand box model test. The influence of two main structural parameters of rib-plate retaining wall and rib length on the stability of the wall is analyzed, and the corresponding reasonable arrangement is obtained. in addition, that failure mode of the rib-plate retaining wall and the position and shape of the rupture surface are studied, and the following conclusions are obtained: (1) the rib-type retaining wall is a solid with the rib plate as the main anchor, and the panel is a soil-retaining soil body; A new type of support structure is used to balance the soil pressure of the wall panel by means of the friction between the rib and the fill. The model test of the indoor sand box shows that the spacing and length of the rib are two key factors that influence the stability of the rib-type retaining wall. (2) The model test of the sand box under the flexible panel was carried out by using 350 g/ m2 of white cardboard as the wall panel,800 g/ m2 of double-ash paper as the rib and quartz sand as the filler, using a glued wood board model box of 750 mm long,500 mm wide and 500 mm high. The test shows that under the influence of low stiffness of the panel, the soil pressure acting on the wall panel causes the wall panel to generate large local deformation, which is more obvious with the increase of the rib spacing, and the self-stability of the retaining wall is unfavorable. the rib area required by the long-rib-thinning arrangement mode in the limit-stable state is large, is limited by the length of the minimum rib, the area of the rib required for the short-rib-densely-densely distributed mode also increases with the spacing of the rib, and therefore, The rib plate is in the arrangement mode of the long-rib sparse cloth and the short-rib dense mode transition area, and the required rib area is small, and is an optimal arrangement mode. (3) An organic glass plate model box with a length of 750 mm, a width of 500 mm and a height of 500 mm is selected, and a rigid panel sand box model test is carried out by using an organic glass plate as a wall panel,800 g/ m2 of double-ash paper as a rib and fine sand as a filler. The test shows that the boundary effect of the side wall of the sand box is not significant, it can be regarded as the symmetrical surface, and the spacing between the rib and the side wall of the sand box is two times the distance of the side wall of the sand box. The stability of the rigid panel rib plate retaining wall is less affected by the self-rigidity of the panel, and the friction effect of the rib and the soil body can be fully exerted, and the floor area of the long-rib-rib-type retaining wall is the smallest under the limit-stable state. (4) Using a steel model box with a length of 800 mm, a width of 600 mm and a height of 600 mm, a plate-type retaining wall model of a 300-mm high-glass-glass material was fabricated, and a four-group sand box model test was carried out with the standard sand as a post-wall filler. After the centrifugal loading, enough displacement of the rib-type retaining wall is given to cause the retaining wall to be damaged, and the position and the shape of the internal rupture surface are observed. when the horizontal displacement of the rib-type retaining wall is large, the wall-pushing test results in that the failure of the rib-type retaining wall is equivalent to the self-buckling failure of the retaining wall under the influence of no external force, There are two typical mechanical action modes of the rib-type retaining wall: when the distance is large, the soil pressure of the anchor force balance wall panel is provided by the friction effect of the rib and the stability area soil, the friction-anchoring type failure mode of the long-rib sparse cloth is long, and the fracture surface in the limit state is located in the intercostal soil; The spacing is small, and the intercostal soil is restrained by the friction of the adjacent rib plates to form a whole body, which is similar to the gravity-type retaining wall which is stabilized by the self-weight of the wall body, and is an integral abrasion-type failure mode with densely distributed short ribs, and the fracture surface is positioned on the back side soil body behind the virtual wall.
【学位授予单位】:西南交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TU476.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姚阳;罗强;谢涛;张玉广;张良;蒋良潍;;基于砂箱模型试验的肋板式挡墙稳定性及合理布置方式分析[J];铁道科学与工程学报;2016年08期
2 孟庆宇;张宏博;岳红亚;孙润生;;锚拉式挡土墙沉降力学特性模型试验研究[J];公路;2016年03期
3 张宏博;孟庆宇;岳红亚;厉超;;对拉式挡土墙侧向土压力分布规律试验研究[J];公路;2016年02期
4 于一凡;张宏博;宋修广;;重载交通下锚拉悬臂式挡土墙受力特性研究[J];公路;2015年07期
5 宋修广;吴建清;张宏博;张思峰;于一凡;;对拉式挡土墙受力特性试验研究[J];铁道建筑;2014年09期
6 杨广庆;;加筋挡土墙合理设计方法的探讨[J];长江科学院院报;2014年03期
7 黄治云;张永兴;董捷;;桩板墙土拱效应及土压力传递特性试验研究[J];岩土力学;2013年07期
8 胡俊强;张永兴;陈林;陈建功;;非极限状态挡土墙主动土压力研究[J];岩土工程学报;2013年02期
9 周健;高冰;彭述权;;不同位移模式下挡土墙的模型试验及数值模拟[J];岩石力学与工程学报;2011年S2期
10 刘新荣;梁宁慧;黄金国;钟和平;;抗滑桩在边坡工程中的研究进展及应用[J];中国地质灾害与防治学报;2006年01期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 李浩;高速铁路无砟轨道路肩桩板墙侧向位移特征及状态控制设计方法研究[D];西南交通大学;2015年
2 陈页开;挡土墙上土压力的试验研究与数值分析[D];浙江大学;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 王广军;桩板墙工程土拱效应及合理桩间距研究[D];西南交通大学;2006年
2 龚慈;不同位移模式下刚性挡土墙土压力计算方法研究[D];浙江大学;2005年
,本文编号:2483938
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jianzhugongchenglunwen/2483938.html