“国学”不宜用于命名一级学科

发布时间：2018-01-19 12:36

本文关键词： 教育行政学科设置国学儒学　出处：《天津社会科学》2010年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当下学界最出格的"国学热"莫过于欲将"国学"推上一级学科位置的盲动。"国学"一词原本有特定的指称对象,即"邦国庠序"。汉唐以来,国学主要指国家最高教育行政机构及其附属的等级地位最高的国立学校,而崇尚儒教为"天子之学"的一般特征。正是由于儒学即国学、国学即儒学的涵义根深蒂固,一些学者所谓的"国学观"之争主要是儒学观之争,而儒学观之争的焦点又是儒学现代价值之争。独尊儒术的"国学"不适用于现代;区隔中西的"国学"存在重大偏弊;涵义混乱的"国学"无法界定学科;夸大功能的"国学"不能使之太热。如果将"国学"列入一级学科名录,就会对中国现代学术产生严重的负面影响。
[Abstract]:The most special "Ancient Chinese Literature Search heat" than to "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" onto a subject position. This "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" is a word originally referring to specific objects, namely "state school". Since the Han and Tang Dynasties, Ancient Chinese Literature Search mainly refers to the national highest education administrative agencies and their affiliated grade the highest national status school, and advocating Confucianism as the general characteristics of "emperor's school". It is because of its Ancient Chinese Literature Search Ancient Chinese Literature Search, namely meaning ingrained Confucianism, some scholars called "Ancient Chinese Literature Search view" dispute is mainly Confucianism dispute, and the focus of Confucianism and Confucianism for the modern value of Confucianism in the dispute. "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" does not apply to the modern western segment; "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" has a major shortcoming; meaning the confusion of "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" cannot be defined discipline; exaggerating the function of "hot Ancient Chinese Literature Search" can't make it. If the "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" included in the disciplines of modern academic list, will have serious Chinese Negative effects.

【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院暨中国社会史研究中心;
【分类号】：G122
【正文快照】： 当下学界最出格的“国学热”莫过于欲将“国学”推上超级学科或一级学科位置的盲动。令人欣慰的是,众多有识之士纷纷提出颇具说服力的批评意见,国家教育行政机构也采取了慎重的态度。孔子曰:“名不正,则言不顺。言不顺,则事不成。”本文侧重从内涵混乱、名实相混的角度,进一

【相似文献】