文学理论与中国古典文学研究

发布时间：2018-01-19 13:41

本文关键词： 中国古典文学研究文学理论逻各斯中心主义阐释学语言表达东西方文化文化传统学术研究西方理论研究领域　出处：《中州学刊》2007年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：汉代王充在《论衡》中说:“知古不知今,谓之陆沉;知今不知古,谓之盲瞽。”如何充分利用中国古典文学的丰富资源,在全球化语境中,勇于开拓而不失去自己精神的家园,成为一个知古知今、知中知外的学者,已经不再局限于古典文学研究与国际汉学研究,而成为当代学术研究的共同课题。有感于此,本刊邀集活跃于相关领域的当代学人,以“中国古典文学资源的当代益用”为题发表笔谈。本期推出的一组文章中,美国哈佛大学博士、香港城市大学教授张隆溪先生的《文学理论与中国古典文学研究》意在结合自己的《道与逻各斯》一书,就当前国际汉学与西方理论成果在中国古典文学研究领域的应用提出自己的看法,其重点在于如何正确运用中国与西方阐释学理论与方法。苏州大学教授方汉文先生将视域集中于当前讨论的焦点之一,即如何建立中国文学史新模式的目标上。南开大学教授宁稼雨先生则就当今古代文学研究中跨文化的主题学提出自己的看法。主题学方法近年来在中国古典文学与比较文学研究中均相当流行,如何看待其得失,并使其本土化,如何创建具有中国特色的叙事文化学,是本文所提出的重要问题。北京大学葛晓音教授从广义的国学研究角度进行的反思,会引起更多学者的关注,这也是意料之中的。本组文章与一般流行的笔谈不同之处在于:作者以各自的实际研究成果来展示自己的观念,并不停留于空泛地谈论应当如何,或是就某一个观点展开激烈争论。这未必不是进入21世纪以来文学研究界相当重要的一种理论话语模式。归根结底,并不在于提倡“问题”还是“主义”,而是研究的实绩能说明一切。当然,我们仍继续推出多种形式、多种看法的文章,其中也可能包括有争议的观点,目的在于促进古典文学研究的跨学科与多元化。
[Abstract]:Wang Chong of the Han Dynasty said in "on the balance": "know the ancient times do not know the present, is called the land sink;" "how to make full use of the rich resources of Chinese classical literature, in the context of globalization, the courage to open up without losing their own spiritual home, become a knowledge of ancient times and today." The scholars who know what they know are no longer confined to the study of classical literature and international Sinology, but have become the common subject of contemporary academic research. For this reason, our journal invites contemporary scholars who are active in relevant fields. "the Contemporary benefit of Chinese Classical Literature Resources" as the title of the paper. Published in this issue of a set of articles, the United States, Harvard University PhD. The study of Literary Theory and Chinese Classical Literature by Professor Zhang Longxi of City University of Hong Kong is intended to combine his book Tao and logos. The author puts forward his own views on the application of international Sinology and western theoretical achievements in the field of Chinese classical literature research. The focus is on how to correctly apply the theories and methods of Chinese and Western hermeneutics. Mr. Fang Hanwen, a professor at Suzhou University, focuses on one of the focuses of the current discussion. Mr. Ning Jia-yu, a professor at Nankai University, put forward his own views on the cross-cultural subject science in the study of ancient Chinese literature. The method of subject study has been used in Chinese classical literature in recent years. And comparative literature studies are quite popular. How to treat its gain and loss and make it localization, how to create narrative culture with Chinese characteristics, is an important question raised in this paper. It is not surprising that this series of articles is different from the popular writing: the author presents his own ideas with his own actual research results. It is not necessarily an important theoretical discourse model in literary research since 21th century. It is not necessarily an important theoretical discourse model in the literary research world since 21th century, which does not stop at talking about what should be done, or to engage in a heated debate on a certain point. It is not that we advocate "problem" or "doctrine", but that the achievements of the study speak for themselves. Of course, we continue to produce articles in many forms and opinions, which may also include controversial points of view. The purpose is to promote the interdisciplinary and diversification of classical literature research.
【作者单位】：香港城市大学跨文化研究中心
【分类号】：I206.2
【正文快照】： 中国古典文学有自己的批评传统,而在我们今天所处的学术环境里,如何坚持自己的传统,又融汇国际汉学和发源于西方的文学批评理论,在中国古典文学研究中开拓新的领域,使用新的方法,以期取得新的成果,的确是值得深入探讨的问题。在这方面,我们很可能会遇到两种偏向:一种过分强调

【相似文献】