重新解读清华国学研究院的当代意义

发布时间：2018-06-01 07:01

本文选题：清华国学院 + 学科体制　；参考：《文化学刊》2009年05期

【摘要】：清华国学研究院的停办,从表面上看,其主因似乎是由于王国维、梁启超的相继殂谢,不复为继。但从深层原因分析,国学研究院的特殊定位与所面临的时代风潮的冲突、传统学术在近代学科体制转型过程中所遭逢的两难困境,以及传统书院式的通才培养与现代教育对专才的倚重之间无可避免的内在矛盾,恐怕才是其自我终结的深刻原因。腾实飞声的清华国学研究院,距今已逾80年;它在历史上的存在虽仅4年,但其影响却不容小觑。今天,我们重新"回首沧桑路",虽然此举未必能够对现代的学术运行制度、学术评价体系的弊端提供直接的应对效用,但作为一种文化精神、人文境界的象征,它至少可以为当代学人和现行学术体制提供一种反思,一种参照,一种文化自省,一种价值理念,乃至一种精神范式与人格自律。
[Abstract]:On the surface, the discontinuation of Tsinghua Institute of Chinese Studies seems to be due to the successive decline of Wang Guowei and Liang Qichao. But from the deep reason analysis, the special orientation of the Chinese Academy of Studies and the conflict of the times, the dilemma that the traditional academic encountered in the course of the transformation of the modern discipline system, The inherent contradiction between the cultivation of generalists and the reliance of modern education on professionals is probably the profound reason for their self-termination. It has been more than 80 years since the Tsinghua National Studies Institute, which has only existed for 4 years in history, but its influence is not to be underestimated. Today, we are looking back on the vicissitudes of life. Although this may not be able to provide a direct response to the shortcomings of the modern academic operating system and academic evaluation system, it is still a symbol of the cultural spirit and the humanistic realm. It can at least provide a reflection, a reference, a cultural introspection, a value concept, and even a spiritual paradigm and personality self-discipline for contemporary scholars and the current academic system.
【作者单位】：徐州师范大学学报编辑部;
【分类号】：G122

【共引文献】