“把汉学中心夺回中国”——20世纪20年代中国现代文史之学的形成历程

发布时间：2018-06-30 17:18

本文选题：中国现代文史之学 + 新汉学　；参考：《史学月刊》2017年01期

【摘要】：20世纪20年代初,中国学人逐渐形成了努力发展现代文史研究以与西方汉学竞胜的学术共识。受此信念驱动,胡适、陈垣、陈寅恪等人,在批判继承乾嘉汉学遗产基础上,借鉴西方汉学将文史研究与现代考古学、语言学结合的治学路径,努力打破陈旧观念,发展出可与西方汉学界竞胜的现代文史研究形态——新汉学,并试图将北大国学门、清华国学院打造成新汉学的中心。虽然这一努力遭受挫折,但其理念及积淀的经验与学术人才,对此后中国现代文史研究的发展产生了重要影响。傅斯年领导的史语所正是承接了前一时期新汉学发展的经验与人才,并将与西方汉学竞胜以争取国家荣耀的理念意识形态化,才迅速蓬勃发展成为中国文史研究的领导机构,并最终完成了中国文史研究的现代转化。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of the 1920s, Chinese scholars gradually formed the academic consensus of trying to develop the study of modern literary history to compete with Western Sinology. Driven by this belief, Hu Shi, Chen Yuan and Chen Yinque, on the basis of criticizing the inheritance of Qianjia heritage, and drawing on the Western Sinology to combine the study of literary history with modern archaeology and linguistics, make great efforts to combine the study of linguistics. Breaking out of old ideas and developing a modern Chinese study of literary history, which can compete with the Western Sinology, the new Han school, and trying to build the University of Peking University and Tsinghua University as the center of the new Sinology. Although this effort has been frustrated, its ideas and accumulated experience and academic talents have produced the development of the study of modern Chinese literary history. The important influence. The history language led by Fu is to undertake the experience and talent of the development of the new Sinology in the previous period, and to compete with Western Sinology for the ideological ideology of national glory, so that it quickly flourished to become the leading institution of the study of Chinese literary history, and finally completed the modern transformation of Chinese literary and history research.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学历史学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金“明德青年学者”项目成果(13XNJ021)
【分类号】：K207.8

【相似文献】