东亚政治思想的发展:伊藤仁斋转向古学之路
发布时间：2018-12-16 20:41
【摘要】：以直读先秦儒学经典、探求圣人之学之真谛、经世致用的古学学派在德川时代初期产生,伊藤仁斋是该学派的首要创始人。仁斋倡导古学之目的,是学圣人之道。他通过直接学古代圣人经典原著,也就是所谓的新创古学,努力复原先秦孔孟思想,从而阐明了其支持封建共主体制,注重以仁为根本,强调可用于人伦日用的经世致用之学。他大胆否定官方推崇的宋学而鼓吹古学,揭示了圣人之学与圣人之教不需通过中间媒介,人人可为可行,个人在社会秩序中的自主独立人格性,同时也成就了自己的一家新说。仁斋的治学理论及带来的新学风,对后来的另一古学创始人荻生徂徕,以及日后出现的竭力以去除"汉意"为目的的"国学",以及德川时代以至近代的所谓日用之学的"实学",都有不可忽视的影响和推动作用。仁斋的圣人道学,承孔子本意,是当时东亚学人有共识的、以文明———圣人之学来辩华夷(civilized or uncivilized)的努力与结晶,全无近代西方舶来的据种族地域类分的狭隘民族主义观念。
[Abstract]:In order to read the Confucian classics of the pre-Qin Dynasty and search for the true meaning of the study of saints, the school of ancient studies which has been applied to the world came into being in the early period of Tokugawa. Ito Renzhai was the chief founder of this school. Renzhai advocated the purpose of ancient learning, is to learn the way of saints. Through the direct study of the original works of ancient saints, that is, the so-called Neo-creation and Ancient Learning, he tried to restore the thought of Confucius and Mencius in the Pre-Qin Dynasty, thus clarifying his support for the feudal communist system, focusing on the benevolence as the foundation, and emphasizing the practical and practical study that can be used for the daily use of human relations. He boldly negates the Song School, which is respected by the government, and advocates the ancient school, which reveals that the study of saints and the religion of saints do not need to be mediated, that everyone can be feasible, that the individual is independent and independent in the social order, and that he has also achieved a new theory of his own. Renzhai's theory of scholarship and the new style of study brought about to the later founder of another ancient school, Disheng Sorai, as well as the later emergence of the "Chinese Studies", which sought to eliminate the "Han Yi". And the practical study of the so-called daily use in Tokugawa era and even in modern times can not be ignored and promoted. Renzhai's Taoism of the saints, following the intention of Confucius, was the common understanding of the East Asian scholars at that time, and the effort and crystallization of the civilization-sage study to argue about the (civilized or uncivilized). There was no modern Western parochial nationalism based on racial and regional division.
【作者单位】： 美国圣约翰大学;
【分类号】：D09
[Abstract]:In order to read the Confucian classics of the pre-Qin Dynasty and search for the true meaning of the study of saints, the school of ancient studies which has been applied to the world came into being in the early period of Tokugawa. Ito Renzhai was the chief founder of this school. Renzhai advocated the purpose of ancient learning, is to learn the way of saints. Through the direct study of the original works of ancient saints, that is, the so-called Neo-creation and Ancient Learning, he tried to restore the thought of Confucius and Mencius in the Pre-Qin Dynasty, thus clarifying his support for the feudal communist system, focusing on the benevolence as the foundation, and emphasizing the practical and practical study that can be used for the daily use of human relations. He boldly negates the Song School, which is respected by the government, and advocates the ancient school, which reveals that the study of saints and the religion of saints do not need to be mediated, that everyone can be feasible, that the individual is independent and independent in the social order, and that he has also achieved a new theory of his own. Renzhai's theory of scholarship and the new style of study brought about to the later founder of another ancient school, Disheng Sorai, as well as the later emergence of the "Chinese Studies", which sought to eliminate the "Han Yi". And the practical study of the so-called daily use in Tokugawa era and even in modern times can not be ignored and promoted. Renzhai's Taoism of the saints, following the intention of Confucius, was the common understanding of the East Asian scholars at that time, and the effort and crystallization of the civilization-sage study to argue about the (civilized or uncivilized). There was no modern Western parochial nationalism based on racial and regional division.
【作者单位】： 美国圣约翰大学;
【分类号】：D09
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 冯百才;新兴学科——森林考古学[J];四川党的建设城市版;2003年09期
2 仝力;引导公众迈入考古学殿堂——《考古的故事——世界100次考古大发现》简介[J];西亚非洲;2002年04期
3 方国根;读朱谦之《日本的朱子学》和《日本的古学及阳明学》[J];日本学刊;2001年06期
4 王震中;关于古代文明起源问题研究的回顾与思考[J];中国史研究动态;1995年02期
5 李帆;刘师培论先秦学术[J];长白学刊;2000年03期
6 周杰;;德川幕府与朱子学——德川幕府对理想政治秩序和社会规范的探求[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2008年02期
7 叶剑锋;中国专制主义的历史学解析[J];理论学刊;2004年11期
8 舒芜;勘诗小记(五)[J];w，
本文编号：2383023
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/guoxuejiaoyulunwen/2383023.html
