全盘反传统抑或改造传统:重审鲁迅与传统文化

发布时间：2019-06-15 14:35

【摘要】：围绕鲁迅与传统文化的关系,在当下愈演愈烈的国学热中,出现了文化罪人、国学家或学问家两种看似相反的鲁迅形象:前者持"断裂说",认为鲁迅全盘反传统思想造成了传统文化的断裂,因此要问罪于鲁迅;后者探讨鲁迅对传统文化的继承关系,着眼于鲁迅深厚的国学修养,由此型塑学问家、国学家的鲁迅形象。文章认为,前者对鲁迅反传统思想缺乏正确的历史评价,后者或多或少遮蔽了鲁迅反传统思想的现代品格。文章通过对海外新儒家加之于鲁迅身上的"全盘反传统"、"反正统"等观点的辨析,论述了鲁迅反传统思想的现代意义及其所凭借的传统资源;探讨了鲁迅反传统思想的历史合法性及其对新传统的建构;同时指出,由于鲁迅对传统文化的批判有着具体的历史情境,往往着眼于救亡图存的现实需要,因此中国传统文化之鲁迅评价可能会产生一些负性影响;最后强调在当下国学热中重申鲁迅传统,以真正实现传统文化的现代转化。
[Abstract]:Around the relationship between Lu Xun and traditional culture, in the growing popularity of traditional Chinese learning, there are two seemingly opposite images of Lu Xun, such as cultural sinners, Sinologists or scholars: the former holds the "fracture theory" and thinks that Lu Xun's total anti-traditional thought has caused the fracture of traditional culture, so we should blame Lu Xun; The latter discusses Lu Xun's inheritance of traditional culture, focusing on Lu Xun's profound cultivation of Chinese studies, thus shaping the image of Lu Xun, a scholar and scholar. The article holds that the former lacks a correct historical evaluation of Lu Xun's anti-traditional thought, while the latter more or less obscures the modern character of Lu Xun's anti-traditional thought. Based on the analysis of the views of "total anti-tradition" and "anti-orthodoxy" added to Lu Xun by overseas Neo-Confucianism, this paper discusses the modern significance of Lu Xun's anti-traditional thought and the traditional resources on which it depends, and probes into the historical legitimacy of Lu Xun's anti-traditional thought and its construction of the new tradition. At the same time, it is pointed out that because Lu Xun's criticism of traditional culture has a specific historical situation and often focuses on the realistic need of saving the nation and survival, Lu Xun's evaluation of Chinese traditional culture may have some negative effects. Finally, it is emphasized that Lu Xun tradition can be reaffirmed in the current Chinese academic fever in order to truly realize the modern transformation of traditional culture.
【作者单位】：人民出版社《新华文摘》编辑部;
【分类号】：I210.96

【相似文献】