洛阳师范学院与北京体育大学体操普修课程模式的对比研究

发布时间：2018-02-10 17:50

本文关键词： 体育教育专业体操普修课程课程模式比较研究　出处：《北京体育大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《普通高等学校体育教育本科专业主干课程教学指导纲要》的颁布,各个高校也都慢慢形成了自己特色风格的体操课程模式,本研究通过对洛阳师范学院体操普修课课程模式的现状进行分析,并拿较具代表性的北京体育大学体操课程模式与之进行对比研究,以新课程方案以及其他相关资料为佐证,取其精华,结合洛阳师范学院的实际情况,提出相应的建议及改革措施,提高体操普修课程的教学质量。本文以两所学校体操教师及体育教育专业学生为调查对象,以两校体操普修教学计划为蓝本,运用文献资料法、问卷调查法、对比分析法等研究方法对洛阳师范学院与北京体育大学的体操普修课课程模式进行了对比研究,结果表明:1)指导思想与课程目标。两校在指导思想与课程目标上基本一致,且也都基本符合新大纲的要求。2)在课程内容方面,两校都是以基本技术的学习为主,北体比较重视基本体操技能的培养,基本技术学习于基本体操技能培养并重,洛师的课程内容整体上难度偏大,尤其是基本技术,对于基本体操技能及社会体育指导能力的培养重视程度不够。3)两校体操普修课的教学方法基本上都是采用讲解示范、完整练习及分解练习等传统的教学方法,对于其他教学方法,例如比赛法、游戏法等的使用频率较小;教学手段上,两校都是在理论课上使用现代多媒体教学手段的频率较高,实践课使用频率较小。4)考核评价方面,洛师比较重视理论与技术成绩的考核,两者占比均为40%,北体比较重视技术与能力,占比分别为40%与50%,两校平时成绩占比相同,均为10%。总体来看,北体侧重于能力与平时的过程性评价,洛师侧重于技术与理论的结果性评价,对于过程性评价较少,这与新大纲中多元化评价的要求不太相符。
[Abstract]:With the promulgation of the outline of Teaching guidance for the main courses of undergraduate physical Education Major in General Colleges and Universities, each university has gradually formed its own style of gymnastics curriculum model. Through the analysis of the current situation of the general course model of gymnastics in Luoyang normal University, this study compares the gymnastics curriculum model of Beijing physical Education University with it, and takes the new curriculum scheme and other relevant materials as evidence. According to the actual situation of Luoyang normal College, the author puts forward some suggestions and reform measures to improve the teaching quality of the general gymnastics course. This paper takes the gymnastic teachers and the students majoring in physical education in two schools as the objects of investigation. Based on the general gymnastics teaching plan of the two schools, this paper makes a comparative study on the general gymnastics course model of Luoyang normal University and Beijing University of physical Education by using the methods of literature, questionnaire and comparative analysis. The results show that the guiding ideology and curriculum objectives of the two schools are basically the same as those of the new syllabus, and both of them are basically in line with the requirements of the new syllabus. The north body pays more attention to the cultivation of basic gymnastics skills, and pays equal attention to the training of basic gymnastics skills. The contents of Luoshi's courses are on the whole more difficult, especially the basic techniques. The training of basic gymnastics skills and social sports guidance ability is not paid enough attention to. 3) the teaching methods of general gymnastics courses in both schools are basically using the traditional teaching methods, such as explaining demonstration, complete exercises and decomposing exercises, etc. For other teaching methods, such as competition method, game method and so on, the frequency of using modern multimedia teaching means is higher in both schools. Luoshi pays more attention to the examination of theoretical and technical achievements. The ratio of both is 40. The north pays more attention to technology and ability, accounting for 40% and 50, respectively. The proportion of the two schools in peacetime grades is the same, both of which are 10. Overall, The northern body focuses on the process evaluation of ability and usual, and Luoshi focuses on the result evaluation of technology and theory, but less on the process evaluation, which is not in line with the requirements of pluralistic evaluation in the new outline.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G83-4

【相似文献】