我国体育社会科学研究范式存在的问题与反思

发布时间：2018-03-25 16:26

本文选题：体育社会科学　切入点：研究范式　出处：《北京体育大学学报》2017年06期

【摘要】：目前我国体育社会科学的研究现状并不理想,很多研究者并未从社会科学研究范式(paradigm)的角度去结合理论研究与体育实践,造成大多数体育社会科学领域在研究问题、理论框架、研究方法等方面尚缺乏规范性和针对性,也未特别考虑要对我国体育领域面临的重大社会问题制定规范性的研究程序。基于此,主要采用文献分析法、比较研究法对国内外体育社会科学博士论文研究范式进行分析,发现我国相关研究的规范性与国外同类研究相比存在较大差距,特别是在研究范式选择、方法的结构上表现的十分混乱。我国体育社会科学研究不但应该国际接轨,而且更应该与母学科接轨。研究应该遵循母学科的研究范式,而不是随心所欲、自娱自乐。应该培养学者选择研究范式的自觉性,依据研究问题的性质选择合理的研究范式,掌握每种研究范式的理论体系、研究规则和方法的结构。并严格在这一研究范式的规则下,建立自己的理论框架,让自己的话语体系建立在该研究范式理论的话语体系之下,从而可以在同一个话语体系里进行理论对话。这样才能真正提高我国体育社会科学研究的规范性。
[Abstract]:At present, the current research situation of sports social sciences in China is not ideal. Many researchers have not combined theoretical research with sports practice from the perspective of social science research paradigm, resulting in the research problems and theoretical framework in most sports social science fields. There is a lack of standardization and pertinence in research methods, and no special consideration has been given to establishing normative research procedures for major social problems in the field of sports in China. The comparative research method analyzes the research paradigm of the doctoral thesis of sports social science at home and abroad, and finds that there is a big gap between the norm of the related research in our country and the similar research abroad, especially in the choice of the research paradigm. The structure of the method is very confusing. The research of sports social sciences in China should not only be integrated internationally, but also be in line with the mother subject. The research should follow the research paradigm of the mother discipline, not as one wishes. We should cultivate the consciousness of scholars to choose the research paradigm, select a reasonable research paradigm according to the nature of the research problem, and master the theoretical system of each kind of research paradigm. To study the structure of rules and methods, and to establish its own theoretical framework under the rules of this research paradigm, so that its own discourse system can be established under the discourse system of the research paradigm theory. Thus, the theoretical dialogue can be carried out in the same discourse system, so as to truly improve the standardization of sports social science research in China.
【作者单位】：上海体育学院体育历史与文化研究中心;上海体育学院国际教育学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:10BTY006)
【分类号】：G812.6

【相似文献】