中俄艺术体操集体项目难度动作构成的对比分析

发布时间：2018-04-25 22:32

本文选题：艺术体操 + 集体项目　；参考：《首都体育学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：艺术体操凭借其独特的项目特点:身体动作与器械的完美结合。充分展现柔美的人体魅力和独特的健身价值,从而稳固的扎根于奥运会的大家庭中。近几年中国队艺术体操集体项目成绩进步越来越快,在世界舞台上,为我国增加了许多光环。2008年北京奥运会上集体项目取得了银牌的好成绩,这是我国艺术体操历史性的一个突破,使得我国与世界强国俄罗斯队的差距越来越小。本文采用文献资料法、录像分析法、数理统计法以及逻辑分析法等,以2013-2016年版艺术体操集体项目国际评分规则为依据,对2015年世界锦标赛(图表中简称“世锦赛”)、2016年奥运会中俄罗斯队和中国队参加的集体项目“5带”、“6棒2圈”,即8套成套动作的构成进行深层、细致的剖析,从中找出中国队与世界强国俄罗斯队艺术体操集体项目整体水平的差距所在,掌握俄罗斯队成套动作的动作设计、编排思路等特点,结合我国运动员的实际特点,得出结论:在无交换难度类型的选择上,中国队的成套动作中单个身体难度动作价值偏低,身体难度类型分值分布不够均衡;在交换难度附加分类型的选择上中国队缺乏多样化,交换的方式大多是五人同时原地交换,队形单一,交换的难度多集中在中等分值区域;在舞步组合部分,中国队流动性队形编排较少,路线移动幅度不够大,巧妙的动作设计以及风格特点没有充分体现,我国运用器械基本技术组数量明显比俄罗斯队少,运动员动作速度偏慢,使得成套动作整体容量减少;在结合抛和旋转的动力性动作方面,惊险度不够高,附加分值局限于附加标准中,而在器械的特定抛法、器械的特定接法的运用上有些缺乏;在运动员之间有或无身体旋转的协作部分,选用的协作类型分布不均衡,有些协作类型中国队和俄罗斯队均未选用,在协作的附加分类型上中国队明显没有世界强国俄罗斯队选用的多,在协作动作的设计上没有充分的体现出新颖性、复杂性、巧妙性。
[Abstract]:Rhythmic gymnastics with its unique characteristics: the perfect combination of body movements and instruments. Full display of soft human charm and unique fitness value, thus firmly rooted in the Olympic family. In recent years, the achievements of the Chinese team's rhythmic gymnastics team have improved more and more rapidly. On the world stage, they have added a lot of glory to our country. In the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, the collective events made good achievements in silver medals. This is a historic breakthrough in rhythmic gymnastics, which makes the gap between our country and Russia, the world power, smaller and smaller. This paper adopts the methods of literature, video analysis, mathematical statistics and logic analysis, etc., based on the international scoring rules for the collective events of rhythmic gymnastics in 2013-2016. The composition of the 2015 World Championships (referred to in the chart as "the World Championships", the collective events of the Russian team and the Chinese team in the 2016 Olympic Games "5 belts", "6 bars and 2 laps"), that is, 8 sets of actions, is deeply and meticulously analyzed. Find out the gap between the Chinese team and the world power Russia team in the overall level of the rhythmic gymnastics collective project, master the characteristics of the movement design and arrangement of the Russian team's complete set of movements, and combine the actual characteristics of our country's athletes. The conclusion is that the value of individual physical difficulty is low and the distribution of physical difficulty type is not balanced in the selection of non-exchange difficulty type. The Chinese team lacks diversity in the choice of additional types of exchange difficulty. Most of the methods of exchange are the exchange of five people at the same time, the formation is single, the difficulty of exchange is concentrated in the area of medium score; in the part of dance step combination, China's mobile formation arrangement is less, the range of route movement is not large enough, the ingenious movement design and style characteristics are not fully reflected, the number of basic technical groups using equipment in our country is obviously less than that of Russian team, and the movement speed of athletes is on the low side. The whole capacity of the complete set of actions is reduced, the degree of thrill is not high enough, the additional value is limited to the additional standard, but there is some lack in the application of the specific throwing method and the specific connecting method of the apparatus; and in the dynamic action of combining throwing and rotating, the degree of thrill is not high enough, and the additional value is limited to the additional standard. In the part of cooperation between athletes with or without body rotation, the distribution of the types of cooperation selected was uneven, and some types of cooperation were not selected by the Chinese team and the Russian team. The Chinese team is obviously not as many as the world power Russia team in the additional type of cooperation, and the design of the cooperative action does not fully reflect novelty, complexity and ingenuity.
【学位授予单位】：首都体育学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G834

【共引文献】