NBA、CBA加时赛进攻战术对比研究
发布时间:2018-05-12 00:41
本文选题:NBA + CBA ; 参考:《成都体育学院》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着篮球职业赛事的不断发展,竞技水平愈来愈高,各联盟内球队之间水平差异也不断缩小。常常会在比赛中出现常规时间未分胜负的情况,这就出现了很多加时决胜的情况。而每一加时又仅有五分钟的比赛时间,选择高效的技战术打法是赢球的关键。NBA是当今世界发展最好的篮球赛事,其水平远高于CBA,有很多优秀的地方值得CBA借鉴和学习。通过对NBA、CBA加时赛视频的观察,并记录相关的数据进行对比分析,探寻获胜球队在进攻技战术安排上的共性以及CBA与NBA在加时赛表现的异同,并对加时期间技战术安排提出相关的建议。文章采用文献资料法、数理统计法、视频观察法、比较分析法以及逻辑推理法,以NBA、CBA加时期间进攻战术安排为研究对象,并统计其中加时赛中的常规战术的使用和非常规战术的使用。常规战术是指比赛中个人单打进攻和团队参与的挡拆配合、传切配合等战术,非常规战术是指比赛中的抢攻战术、暂停战术、掷界外球战术等。探求胜负球队在加时赛进攻技战术选择上的差异、NBA和CBA在加时赛中技战术选择的区别以及影响加时赛战术安排的主要因素。主要研究成果如下:(1)加时赛获胜球队与失利球队在进攻战术选择的相同点:个人战术成为加时赛进最主要的进攻方式;获胜球队会选择更多的团队技战术完成进攻;在出手位置的选择主要集中在限制区和三分线外,都忽视了三分线内中间区域的利用;从得分分布来看,限制区是最主要的得分位置,其次罚球对加时赛影响愈来愈大;而NBA与CBA加时赛技战术选择不同点在于:CBA在进攻选择时利用个人能力完成进攻更多,在出手位置选择时CBA三分线外出手比例更大。(2)加时赛最后阶段非常规战术的使用越来越频繁,非常规战术大多是落后球队在比赛最后阶段不得已而使用的战术安排,影响加时赛非常战术使用最直接的因素就是时间和比分。主要包括:抢攻战术、犯规战术、请求暂停、掷界外球战术、最后一攻战术安排。主要的建议有:(1)利用团队的力量打好加时,在技战术安排时应重视对限制区的利用。(2)重视加时赛开局战术安排,努力打好开局。(3)球队球星和外援对加时赛影响越来越大。(4)根据场上不同的态势安排即时有效的战术。(5)NBA、CBA竞技水平差距明显,加强CBA球队竞技水平的提高。
[Abstract]:With the development of professional basketball events, the competitive level is getting higher and higher. There is a lot of overtime to win or lose in a regular game. And each extra time is only five minutes of competition time, the choice of efficient technical and tactical play is the key to win. The NBA is the world's best basketball game, its level is far higher than the CBA, there are many excellent places to learn and learn from CBA. By observing the video of NBA CBA overtime, and comparing and analyzing the relevant data, this paper explores the general character of the winning team in attacking tactics and arrangement, and the similarities and differences between CBA and NBA in overtime. And the technical and tactical arrangements during the overtime to put forward the relevant suggestions. In this paper, the methods of literature, mathematical statistics, video observation, comparative analysis and logical reasoning are used to study the offensive tactics of NBACBA during the overtime period. And count the use of conventional tactics and unconventional tactics in overtime. Conventional tactics refer to the tactics of individual single attack and team participation in the match, such as the cooperation of baffle and tangent, etc. Unconventional tactics refer to the tactics of attack, pause, throw and so on. To find out the difference in the choice of offensive techniques and tactics between the winning and losing teams in extra time the differences between NBA and CBA in overtime and the main factors affecting the tactical arrangement of overtime are discussed. The main research results are as follows: (1) the choice of offensive tactics between the winning team and the losing team in overtime is the same: personal tactics become the most important attack mode, the winning team will choose more teams to complete the attack. The choice of shooting position is mainly focused on the restricted zone and the three-point line, ignoring the utilization of the middle area in the three-point line, the restricted zone is the most important scoring position, and the second penalty is more and more important to the overtime game. And the difference between NBA and CBA overtime is that the NBA makes more use of their personal ability to complete the attack. The proportion of outfielder in the CBA three-point line is more and more. 2) the use of unconventional tactics is more and more frequent in the final stage of overtime, and most of the unconventional tactics are the tactical arrangement that backward teams have to use in the final stage of the game. The most direct factor affecting the use of extra-time extraordinary tactics is time and score. Mainly include: attack tactics, foul tactics, request suspension, throw ball tactics, the last attack tactical arrangements. The main suggestions are: 1) make use of the strength of the team to play overtime, in technical and tactical arrangements, we should pay attention to the use of restricted zones. Try hard to make a good start. 3) the influence of star and foreign aid on overtime is more and more great. 4) according to the different situation on the court, the effective tactics are arranged immediately and effectively. The gap of competitive level of CBA team is obvious, and the improvement of CBA team's competitive level is strengthened.
【学位授予单位】:成都体育学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G841
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 金加升;现代篮球比赛过程阶段划分及其一般应对策略[J];北京体育大学学报;2005年09期
,本文编号:1876384
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1876384.html