北京体育大学在校大学生兼职足球教练员的教学效能感研究

发布时间：2018-08-01 17:58

【摘要】：本文通过教学效能感量表对北京体育大学足球专业在校大学生进行了调查研究。选取了个人基本情况以及代课情况包括性别、年级、运动等级、专业、运动年限、教练员等级、教师资格证、代课年限、代课类型、代课报酬等12个变量,运用excel表格和spss统计软件对教学效能感、个人教学效能感和一般教育效能感进行了单因素方差分析来统计、运算、分析研究。结果表明:北京体育大学足球专项的在校大学生的教学效能感、一般教育效能感和个人教学效能感在性别方面都具有显著性差异,且男生都好于女生。北京体育大学足球专项的在校大学在年级、运动等级、教练员等级方面的个人教学效能感存在着显著性差异,一般教学效能感和总的教学效能感没有显著性差异。在个人教学效能感方面,大四年级的在校大学生教学效能感最高,其次就是研三年级学生,最低的是大一新生;在运动等级方面的比较,在校大学生为国家一级运动员等级的个人教学效能感最高,国家三级运动员等级的学生最低;在不同教练员等级的比较中,亚足联c级教练员的得分最高,其次是d级教练员,最低的是无教练员等级的学生。北京体育大学足球专项的在校大学生的教学效能感、一般教育效能感和个人教学效能感在不同专业、不同运动年限、不同现阶段平均分、是否具有教师资格证、代课年限、不同代课报酬方面都不存在显著性差异。北京体育大学足球专项的在校大学生总的教学效能感和个人教学效能感在在不同代课类型存在显著性差异,在一般教育效能感方面不存在显著性差异。两者都是在业余足球俱乐部进行代课的学生教学效能感最高。
[Abstract]:This paper investigates the college students majoring in football in Beijing University of physical Education by teaching efficacy scale. 12 variables including gender, grade, sports grade, major, sports years, coaches' grade, teacher's qualification certificate, substitute years, substitute class type, substitute reward and so on were selected. The single factor variance analysis of teaching efficacy, personal teaching efficacy and general educational efficacy was carried out by using excel tables and spss software. The results showed that there were significant differences in teaching efficacy, general educational efficacy and personal teaching efficacy between male and female students, and boys were better than girls. There are significant differences in personal teaching efficacy in grade, sports level and coaches' level in the football program of Beijing University of physical Education, but there is no significant difference between general teaching efficacy and total teaching efficacy. In terms of personal teaching efficacy, the college students in the fourth grade had the highest sense of teaching efficacy, followed by the third-year students, and the lowest were freshmen. College students have the highest sense of personal teaching efficacy at the level of national first-grade athletes, while the students of the grade of national third-level athletes have the lowest; in the comparison of different levels of coaches, the scores of the C-level coaches of the Asian Football Association are the highest, followed by the coaches of the grade d. The lowest is the student with no coaching level. The teaching efficacy, general educational efficacy and personal teaching efficacy of the football students of Beijing physical Education University are divided into different majors, different sports years, different average scores at present, whether they have teacher qualification certificates and substitute teaching years. There is no significant difference in different substitute pay. There are significant differences in the total teaching efficacy and personal teaching efficacy between the students of Beijing physical Education University football project in different substitute types, but there is no significant difference in the general educational efficacy. Both are the students who substitute in the amateur football club have the highest sense of teaching efficacy.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G807.4

【相似文献】