我国优秀羽毛球男子双打运动员张楠、傅海峰技战术研究
发布时间：2018-08-26 12:02
【摘要】：为了解和掌握我国优秀羽毛球男子双打运动员在不同赛次与不同运动员搭档时的技战术情况和优劣势,运用文献资料法、录像观察法和数理统计法等研究方法,以我国优秀羽毛球男子双打选手张楠、傅海峰在2013-2016赛季与不同运动员组合张楠/李根、张楠/徐晨、张楠/鲁恺、傅海峰/洪炜、傅海峰/徐晨、傅海峰/蔡峗、张楠/傅海峰的18场比赛为研究对象,对张楠、傅海峰与不同运动员搭档的技战术运用、击球落点、得失分状况和击球回合数进行统计分析,以期为其之后的训练和比赛提供依据。经过分析和研究,得出以下结论:1、发球阶段,张楠、傅海峰与不同运动员搭档时,发球形式较为固定,发球技术路线灵活,落点区域较为集中,以反手发网前小球1号区和5号区居多,占所有发球区域的86.1%和9.0%。傅海峰发球多以进攻性为主,张楠则以防守性为主,两人发球成功率高,且得分率普遍高于失分率。2、接发球环节,不同组合中傅海峰、张楠,接发球落点均表现为:前场中场后场,为保证前场优势,傅海峰以快抢快攻获取网前主动较多,张楠则采用搓放和推勾技术调动对方居多,两人均以攻击前场中路、近网小球、中线中路及边线区的技战术为主。得失分中,两人技术失分率普遍高于得分率,且直接得分较少,多数是以后期压迫性进攻和对手失误性得分居多。3、前中后场击球阶段,不同组合中张楠、傅海峰两人击球落点频率为前场中场后场,技战术运用中,傅海峰主要以快速下压进攻扑杀和推挑落点打击的方式,来充分调动和压制对手,但进攻性失误较多;张楠则通过使用防守性助攻技术推、扑、搓、挡和过渡性技术挑球,来获取进攻和防守反攻机会,但防守失误较多,主动得分较少。4、最后一拍技术阶段,在不同组合中,张楠、傅海峰主要以前场搓勾、中场推扑和后场杀吊为主要得分手段,击球落点区域张楠主要位于1、2、4、5号区,傅海峰则为2、4、5、6号区,两人击球落点较为集中,以中线中路为主,边线区为辅。张楠技术失分率普遍高于得分率,且被动失分和防守失分较多,傅海峰防守和受迫时的防守反击能力较强,但主动失分较多。5、运动员傅海峰、张楠在不同组合中,击球方式多以快攻为主,通过快速抢抓和推扑占据得分优势,且整体回合数频次较为集中,多以1、2、3、4、5回合为主,但受不同搭档技术组合配对和不同对手技战术的影响,击球回合数频次差异较大。
[Abstract]:In order to understand and master the technical and tactical situation and advantages and disadvantages of Chinese elite badminton male doubles players in different matches with different players, the methods of literature, video observation and mathematical statistics were used. In 2013-2016, Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng, Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng, and various athletes in the 2013-2016 season, Zhang Nan / Li Gan, Zhang Nan / Zhang Nan, Zhang Nan / Lu Kay, Fu Haifeng / Hong Wei, Fu Haifeng / #china_person_person, Fu Haifeng / Tsai Chun, were joined by Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng, Fu Haifeng, Fu Haifeng and Fu Haifeng in the 2013-2016 season. Zhang Nan / Fu Haifeng's 18 matches as the research object, the paper makes a statistical analysis of the techniques and tactics used, the hitting point, the gain and loss points and the number of batting rounds of Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng and different players. In order to provide a basis for its subsequent training and competition. Through analysis and research, we can draw the following conclusions: 1, serving stage, Zhang Nan and Fu Haifeng, when they partner with different players, serve in a more fixed form, serve a flexible technical route, and have a more concentrated landing area. The first and fifth areas of the backhand netting were the most common, accounting for 86.1% and 9.0% of all the serve areas. Fu Haifeng's serve was mainly offensive, Zhang Nan was mainly defensive, and the two men had a high success rate in serving, and the scoring rate was generally higher than the score rate of .2. in different combinations, Fu Haifeng, Zhang Nan, The receiving and serving points are as follows: front field midfield and back court, in order to ensure the advantage of the front field, Fu Haifeng took the initiative to get the net with quick and quick attack, Zhang Nan used the technique of twisting and pushing and ticking to mobilize the other side, both of them attacked the front court in the middle of the field, near the net ball, both of them had to attack the front court in the middle of the field, close to the net ball. The middle line and the border of the main technical and tactical areas. In the points of gain and loss, the technical loss rate of the two men is generally higher than that of the score rate, and the direct score is less. Most of them score mostly in the late period of compression attack and the opponent's error, the front, middle and back court batting stage, Zhang Nan in different combinations, Fu Haifeng and Fu Haifeng hit the spot frequency as the front field midfield backcourt, in the technical and tactical application, Fu Haifeng mainly by the fast down attack culling and the push and drop point strike way, to fully mobilize and suppress the opponent, but the offensive error is many; Zhang Nan, on the other hand, used defensive assists to push, pounce, rub, block, and transitional techniques to pick up the ball to gain the opportunity to attack and defend the counter-offensive. However, he made more defensive mistakes and scored fewer scores on his own initiative. In the last technical stage of the shooting, in different combinations, Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng mainly takes the front court rubbing hook, the midfield pushing and throwing and the rear court killing and suspending as the main scoring means. Zhang Nan, the hitting point area, is mainly located in the 1zao 2n 4and 5 districts, and Fu Haifeng is the 2o 4N 5and 6 districts. The two batting points are relatively concentrated, mainly in the middle of the middle line. The borderline area is auxiliary. The technical loss rate of Zhang Nan is generally higher than that of scoring rate, and there are more passive and defensive loss points. Fu Haifeng has stronger defense and counter-attack ability when he is being forced to defend, but the active losing points are more .5. the players Fu Haifeng and Zhang Nan are in different combinations. Most of the batting methods are fast attack, with fast grabbing and pushing and pouncing taking the advantage of scoring, and the frequency of the whole round is more concentrated. Most of the batting is dominated by 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5 rounds, but it is influenced by different technical combinations of partners and techniques and tactics of different opponents. The number of batting rounds varies greatly.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G847
本文编号：2204812
[Abstract]:In order to understand and master the technical and tactical situation and advantages and disadvantages of Chinese elite badminton male doubles players in different matches with different players, the methods of literature, video observation and mathematical statistics were used. In 2013-2016, Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng, Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng, and various athletes in the 2013-2016 season, Zhang Nan / Li Gan, Zhang Nan / Zhang Nan, Zhang Nan / Lu Kay, Fu Haifeng / Hong Wei, Fu Haifeng / #china_person_person, Fu Haifeng / Tsai Chun, were joined by Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng, Fu Haifeng, Fu Haifeng and Fu Haifeng in the 2013-2016 season. Zhang Nan / Fu Haifeng's 18 matches as the research object, the paper makes a statistical analysis of the techniques and tactics used, the hitting point, the gain and loss points and the number of batting rounds of Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng and different players. In order to provide a basis for its subsequent training and competition. Through analysis and research, we can draw the following conclusions: 1, serving stage, Zhang Nan and Fu Haifeng, when they partner with different players, serve in a more fixed form, serve a flexible technical route, and have a more concentrated landing area. The first and fifth areas of the backhand netting were the most common, accounting for 86.1% and 9.0% of all the serve areas. Fu Haifeng's serve was mainly offensive, Zhang Nan was mainly defensive, and the two men had a high success rate in serving, and the scoring rate was generally higher than the score rate of .2. in different combinations, Fu Haifeng, Zhang Nan, The receiving and serving points are as follows: front field midfield and back court, in order to ensure the advantage of the front field, Fu Haifeng took the initiative to get the net with quick and quick attack, Zhang Nan used the technique of twisting and pushing and ticking to mobilize the other side, both of them attacked the front court in the middle of the field, near the net ball, both of them had to attack the front court in the middle of the field, close to the net ball. The middle line and the border of the main technical and tactical areas. In the points of gain and loss, the technical loss rate of the two men is generally higher than that of the score rate, and the direct score is less. Most of them score mostly in the late period of compression attack and the opponent's error, the front, middle and back court batting stage, Zhang Nan in different combinations, Fu Haifeng and Fu Haifeng hit the spot frequency as the front field midfield backcourt, in the technical and tactical application, Fu Haifeng mainly by the fast down attack culling and the push and drop point strike way, to fully mobilize and suppress the opponent, but the offensive error is many; Zhang Nan, on the other hand, used defensive assists to push, pounce, rub, block, and transitional techniques to pick up the ball to gain the opportunity to attack and defend the counter-offensive. However, he made more defensive mistakes and scored fewer scores on his own initiative. In the last technical stage of the shooting, in different combinations, Zhang Nan, Fu Haifeng mainly takes the front court rubbing hook, the midfield pushing and throwing and the rear court killing and suspending as the main scoring means. Zhang Nan, the hitting point area, is mainly located in the 1zao 2n 4and 5 districts, and Fu Haifeng is the 2o 4N 5and 6 districts. The two batting points are relatively concentrated, mainly in the middle of the middle line. The borderline area is auxiliary. The technical loss rate of Zhang Nan is generally higher than that of scoring rate, and there are more passive and defensive loss points. Fu Haifeng has stronger defense and counter-attack ability when he is being forced to defend, but the active losing points are more .5. the players Fu Haifeng and Zhang Nan are in different combinations. Most of the batting methods are fast attack, with fast grabbing and pushing and pouncing taking the advantage of scoring, and the frequency of the whole round is more concentrated. Most of the batting is dominated by 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5 rounds, but it is influenced by different technical combinations of partners and techniques and tactics of different opponents. The number of batting rounds varies greatly.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G847
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 李宏义;;世界优秀羽毛球男子双打前场技术分析[J];体育科技文献通报;2016年12期
2 陈浩;;2015上半年中国羽毛球男子双打技战术对比分析——以2015年全英公开赛为例[J];福建体育科技;2015年05期
3 叶奥婷;杨叙;;对全英公开赛决赛李龙大、郑在成的发抢战术分析[J];运动;2014年23期
4 陈珂;;关于专业羽毛球男子双打发球和接发球技战术的探讨[J];南昌师范学院学报;2014年03期
5 李博;谢俊;;羽毛球男子单打和女子单打比赛得分特征对比分析——以2013年10场国际羽毛球赛事男子单打、女子单打决赛为研究对象[J];中国体育科技;2014年02期
6 刘贤辉;;中国与世界优秀羽毛球男子双打前三拍的技战术分析[J];长沙大学学报;2013年05期
7 佘曦;陈滔;许永德;;羽毛球男双技战术特征分析[J];体育学刊;2013年02期
8 李绍银;胡志;;2011年羽毛球世锦赛蔡峗/傅海峰VS郑在成/李龙大的技战术研究[J];四川体育科学;2012年05期
9 王明清;;运动技术与战术教学研究[J];中国科教创新导刊;2010年10期
10 周金玲;戴劲;;羽毛球男子双打项目21分赛制技战术特征分析[J];北京体育大学学报;2010年01期
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前10条
1 何非;中外优秀羽毛球男双选手得失分技战术的效果与特征研究[D];北京体育大学;2016年
2 刘志军;2014年仁川亚运会羽毛球男团决赛技术运用对比分析[D];郑州大学;2016年
3 吴静知;中外优秀羽毛球男子双打运动员技战术运用对比分析[D];广州大学;2016年
4 陈军;世界优秀羽毛球男子双打得分拍相关因素分析[D];四川师范大学;2016年
5 李德庆;中韩羽毛球男子双打项目中杀球技术对比分析[D];苏州大学;2016年
6 蒋嘉;羽毛球男子双打运动员前三拍技术的分析[D];湖南师范大学;2015年
7 王海波;中外羽毛球男子双打运动员技战术运用比较分析[D];辽宁师范大学;2015年
8 黄海;世界优秀羽毛球男子双打运动员技战术运用特征的研究[D];北京体育大学;2015年
9 杨宇辰;2013-2015赛季世界顶尖羽毛球男子双打运动员技战术运用分析[D];郑州大学;2015年
10 林洋;林丹与李宗伟的技战术对比研究[D];江西师范大学;2015年
，本文编号：2204812
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2204812.html
