世界优秀横拍进攻型选手马龙、樊振东的技战术特征对比分析

发布时间：2018-10-16 16:08

【摘要】：本论文运用文献资料法、录像观察法、数理统计法和逻辑分析法对马龙和樊振东在2014年-2016年的30场重大比赛中的技战术进行研究分析。从两人在比赛中的技术、落点、线路以及技术组合等几个方面出发研究,以期可以找到各自技战术的优缺点以及两人的异同点,总结规律,为双方以后更加全面的发展提供参考,也为今后我国乒乓球队的训练和比赛提供一些具有可行性的建议。通过研究和分析,得出以下结论:1、樊振东发侧旋、逆侧旋与转与不转球的比例相当,马龙则发侧旋较多,落点都以短球为主,但马龙发球的直接得分率较樊振东高。一三板衔接中,马龙和樊振东都是以抢发抢为主,但是马龙的抢攻使用率更高;三五板衔接中,马龙和樊振东在第三板上手后,第五板都以反手为主。2、发抢段战术运用中,马龙发球后多以连续进攻为主,而樊振东发侧旋与逆侧旋后,多以连续攻为主,在发转与不转球后,多以控后攻为主。3、接发球时,马龙接控使用的较樊振东多,而樊振东接抢使用较马龙多。二四板衔接中,马龙和樊振东都是以拧后连续攻为主;四六板衔接中,马龙和樊振东都是连续反手为主。4、接抢段战术运用中,马龙在控制后连续攻的得分率和使用率相对较高,而樊振东接发球上手后连续攻的使用率和得分率相对更高。5、最后两板的技术衔接中,马龙和樊振东使用最多的是连续反手,其次是反手拉后衔接正手拉,效果都一般,马龙相对更好一些。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the techniques and tactics of Ma Long and Fan Zhendong in 30 major competitions from 2014 to 2016 were studied and analyzed by means of literature, video observation, mathematical statistics and logic analysis. From the aspects of technology, landing point, circuit and technical combination of the two people in the competition, the author hopes to find the advantages and disadvantages of their respective techniques and tactics, as well as the similarities and differences between the two men, and to sum up the rules. It also provides some feasible suggestions for the training and competition of Chinese table tennis team in the future. Through research and analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. Fan Zhendong has the same proportion of lateral spin, reverse spin and no spin, Ma Long has more lateral spin, and the main landing point is short ball, but the direct scoring rate of Ma Long is higher than that of Fan Zhendong. Among the three boards, Ma Long and Fan Zhendong both focused on robberies and robberies, but Ma Long's use rate of attack was even higher. In the third and fifth boards of convergence, Ma Long and Fan Zhendong were in the third board, and the fifth board was mainly backhand. 2. In the use of the tactics of firing and snatching, Ma Long usually takes continuous attack after serving, while Fan Zhendong's side spin and reverse lateral spin are mainly continuous attacks. After serving and not turning the ball, most of them are controlled back attack. 3. When receiving the serve, Ma Long uses more control and control than Fan Zhendong. Fan Zhendong to grab more than Ma Long. Ma Long and Fan Zhendong both focused on back-to-back attacks in connection with the second and fourth boards. In the four or six boards convergence, Ma Long and Fan Zhendong were both continuous backhands. 4. In the use of the tactics of grabbing and snatching, the scoring rate and the rate of utilization of successive attacks after taking control were relatively high. The utilization rate and scoring rate of successive attacks after Fan Zhendong's receiving serve is relatively higher. 5. In the technical convergence of the last two boards, Ma Long and Fan Zhendong used the most continuous backhand, followed by backhand pulling and connecting forehand pull. The results were both mediocre. Ma Long is relatively better.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G846

【相似文献】