第25、26届女篮亚锦赛中日韩后卫队员进攻技术运用对比研究
发布时间：2019-04-26 23:27
【摘要】：从25、26两届亚锦赛来看,中、日、韩女篮后卫队员的技术运用情况有着明显的变化,尤其是26届亚锦赛中,日本韩国女篮后卫队员的进攻技术比往年有着大幅度提升,这引起了我国高度重视。研究运用文献资料法、专家访谈法、录像观察统计法、数理统计法、逻辑分析法等研究方法并结合第25女篮亚锦赛4场比赛和第26届女篮亚锦赛6场比赛相关比赛视频,对中、日、韩,三个国家的女篮后位队员的各项能力进行对比与分析。通过研究得出以下结论:1.中国女篮后卫队员在身高方面,两届亚锦赛与日本和韩国相比具有明显优势,日韩两国女篮后卫队员身高普遍较低;主要后卫队员平均年龄在26岁左右,是女篮后卫队员容易取得好成绩的黄金年龄。上场时间上日本队有明显变化,在单节比赛结束前往往利用三名后卫在场上主动加快比赛节奏。2.中国队后卫队员在得分能力方面和日本女篮后卫队员有着明显差距:重点后卫队员场均罚篮次数少,命中率低;在二分得分和三分得分方面,日本队后卫队员得分能力最强,远远多于中国和韩国女篮后卫队员。3.我国女篮后卫队员助攻能力有了较大的提高,但与日本和韩国女篮优秀后卫队员相比还存在着不足和差距,中国队后卫队员助攻意识不强,主要以个人进攻为主,场均助攻效率与日本韩国两队差距甚远。4.中国女篮后卫队员在突破进攻需要加强,日本和韩国队后卫队员的突破后投篮或传球的选择较为恰当,投篮命中率高,突破后传球多。中国队后卫队员突破路线单一、速度节奏变化不明显,导致失误较多。5.中国女篮后卫组织进攻配合方面参与基础配合较少,主动为队员创造进攻意识薄弱;日本队后卫队员多利用无球掩护和突破分球创造机会;韩国队后卫主要以突破分球和传切为队友创造机会。6.中国女篮后卫队员在发动快攻能力较弱,与日本队后卫队员有着明显差距,日本女篮后卫队员发动快攻次数远远高于中韩两队,日本队后卫队员发动快攻主要以抢断球为主,获得球权后迅速转换为快攻的能力较强,而中国和韩国队后卫队员在发动快攻方面较弱。快攻过程中,以传球为主,运球为辅;以边线为主,中路为辅。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the 25,26th Asian Championships, there are obvious changes in the technical application of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean women basketball guards, especially in the 26th Asian Championships, the offensive techniques of Japanese and Korean women basketball guards have significantly improved compared with previous years. This has caused our country to attach great importance to. The research uses the methods of literature, expert interview, video observation statistics, mathematical statistics, logical analysis and so on, and combines the video of four games of the 25th Women's Basketball Asian Championships and six games of the 26th Women's Basketball Asian Championships. Japan, South Korea, three countries of the women's basketball players behind the ability to compare and analysis. The following conclusions are drawn from the study: 1. In terms of height of Chinese women's basketball defenders, the two Asian championships have obvious advantages over Japan and South Korea, and the height of women's basketball guards in Japan and South Korea is generally lower than that of Japan and South Korea. The average age of the main guard is about 26, which is the golden age for women's basketball defenders to get good results. The Japanese team had obvious changes in the playing time, often using three defenders to accelerate the pace of the game on the court before the end of a single-quarter match. 2. There is a significant gap between Chinese defenders and Japanese women's basketball defenders in their ability to score points: the average number of free throws per game of key defenders is less and the shooting rate is low; In terms of two points and three points, Japanese defenders have the strongest ability to score, far more than Chinese and South Korean women's basketball defenders. China's women's basketball defenders have greatly improved their ability to assist attacks, but there are still shortcomings and gaps in comparison with excellent women's basketball defenders in Japan and South Korea, and the Chinese defenders have little awareness of assists, and mainly focus on individual attacks. Average assists are far behind Japan and South Korea. 4. 4. Chinese women's basketball defenders need to strengthen the breakthrough attack, Japan and South Korea team guards after the breakthrough shot or pass choice is more appropriate, shooting rate is high, after the breakthrough pass more. Chinese team guards break through a single route, speed rhythm change is not obvious, leading to more mistakes. 5. The Chinese women's basketball defenders are less involved in the basic cooperation in organizing offensive coordination, and they are active in creating weak offensive consciousness for the players, while Japanese defenders often make use of no-ball cover and break-through scoring to create opportunities for them to make use of non-ball cover and breakthrough scoring. South Korea guard mainly to break through the goal and cross for teammates to create opportunities. 6. Chinese women's basketball defenders have a weak ability to launch fast break, and there is a clear gap between Japanese women's basketball guards and Japanese team defenders. Japanese women's basketball defenders launch fast break far more frequently than China and South Korea, and Japanese defenders start fast break mainly by stealing the ball. The ability to quickly convert to fast break after gaining the ball power is stronger, while Chinese and South Korean defenders are weak in starting fast break. In the process of fast break, pass is the main, dribbling is the auxiliary; the sideline is the main, the middle is the auxiliary.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the 25,26th Asian Championships, there are obvious changes in the technical application of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean women basketball guards, especially in the 26th Asian Championships, the offensive techniques of Japanese and Korean women basketball guards have significantly improved compared with previous years. This has caused our country to attach great importance to. The research uses the methods of literature, expert interview, video observation statistics, mathematical statistics, logical analysis and so on, and combines the video of four games of the 25th Women's Basketball Asian Championships and six games of the 26th Women's Basketball Asian Championships. Japan, South Korea, three countries of the women's basketball players behind the ability to compare and analysis. The following conclusions are drawn from the study: 1. In terms of height of Chinese women's basketball defenders, the two Asian championships have obvious advantages over Japan and South Korea, and the height of women's basketball guards in Japan and South Korea is generally lower than that of Japan and South Korea. The average age of the main guard is about 26, which is the golden age for women's basketball defenders to get good results. The Japanese team had obvious changes in the playing time, often using three defenders to accelerate the pace of the game on the court before the end of a single-quarter match. 2. There is a significant gap between Chinese defenders and Japanese women's basketball defenders in their ability to score points: the average number of free throws per game of key defenders is less and the shooting rate is low; In terms of two points and three points, Japanese defenders have the strongest ability to score, far more than Chinese and South Korean women's basketball defenders. China's women's basketball defenders have greatly improved their ability to assist attacks, but there are still shortcomings and gaps in comparison with excellent women's basketball defenders in Japan and South Korea, and the Chinese defenders have little awareness of assists, and mainly focus on individual attacks. Average assists are far behind Japan and South Korea. 4. 4. Chinese women's basketball defenders need to strengthen the breakthrough attack, Japan and South Korea team guards after the breakthrough shot or pass choice is more appropriate, shooting rate is high, after the breakthrough pass more. Chinese team guards break through a single route, speed rhythm change is not obvious, leading to more mistakes. 5. The Chinese women's basketball defenders are less involved in the basic cooperation in organizing offensive coordination, and they are active in creating weak offensive consciousness for the players, while Japanese defenders often make use of no-ball cover and break-through scoring to create opportunities for them to make use of non-ball cover and breakthrough scoring. South Korea guard mainly to break through the goal and cross for teammates to create opportunities. 6. Chinese women's basketball defenders have a weak ability to launch fast break, and there is a clear gap between Japanese women's basketball guards and Japanese team defenders. Japanese women's basketball defenders launch fast break far more frequently than China and South Korea, and Japanese defenders start fast break mainly by stealing the ball. The ability to quickly convert to fast break after gaining the ball power is stronger, while Chinese and South Korean defenders are weak in starting fast break. In the process of fast break, pass is the main, dribbling is the auxiliary; the sideline is the main, the middle is the auxiliary.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王润生,张冉;谈篮球核心后卫队员的培养[J];湖北体育科技;2001年01期
2 付雷,李建龙;谈优秀冰球后卫应具备的条件[J];哈尔滨体育学院学报;2004年02期
3 王小平;;我国核心后卫存在的问题及对青少年训练的启示[J];体育科学研究;2006年03期
4 赵文胜;;篮球核心后卫相关问题研究[J];郑州铁路职业技术学院学报;2007年01期
5 凌柳雄;;试论篮球后卫的培养和训练[J];广西工学院学报;2007年S1期
6 郭彩琴;;篮球后卫应具备的能力及影响因素[J];百色学院学报;2007年03期
7 黄荔生;;浅谈篮球后卫队员应具备的能力与培养方法[J];莆田学院学报;2007年06期
8 梁亮;;浅谈篮球核心后卫的培养[J];科学大众(科学教育);2010年05期
9 刘彬;;关于我国篮球后卫的探讨[J];南昌教育学院学报;2010年05期
10 李文龙;李权;;篮球后卫的作用与素质分析[J];科教导刊(中旬刊);2013年02期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 斯力格;李强;刘丹;;国际高水平足球赛后卫队员跑动能力研究[A];第九届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编(3)[C];2011年
2 朱青;张宏杰;;第15届男篮世锦赛中外后卫队员进攻能力的比较研究[A];第八届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编（一）[C];2007年
3 张t，
本文编号：2466485
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2466485.html
