运动行为调节问卷在中国大学生运动员中的检验

发布时间：2019-05-15 21:44

【摘要】：目的:对中文版《运动行为调节问卷》(BRSQ-6)在中国大学生运动员人群的应用进行信效度检验。方法:研究者采用翻译-回译的方法将BRSQ-6翻译成中文,并在334名中国大学生运动员人群中进行施测。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)及探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)对BRSQ六个测量模型进行了检验和比较,对BRSQ-6的结构效度进行检验。同时,对内部一致性信度及理论效度进行检验。结果:与已有研究相一致,BRSQ-6六因子模型(模型1)相对拟合更好。已有研究表明CFA在多因子模型估计中体现的不足,可以通过ESEM得以解决。研究发现,ESEM结果优于CFA结果,并且更加合理。另外,研究结果表明各分量表的内部一致性信度及问卷的理论效度均达到预期可接受水平。结论:整体而言,中文版BRSQ-6的信效度指标达到可接受水平,但个别条目的跨因子现象存在异常,仍需进一步修订及检验。
[Abstract]:Objective: to test the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Sports behavior Regulation questionnaire (BRSQ-6) in Chinese college athletes. Methods: the researchers translated BRSQ-6 into Chinese by translation-back translation and tested it in 334Chinese college athletes. Verification factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) were used to test and compare the six measurement models of BRSQ. the structural validity of BRSQ-6 was tested. At the same time, the reliability and theoretical validity of internal consistency are tested. Results: consistent with the previous studies, the BRSQ- 6 six factor model (model 1) was better fitted. Previous studies have shown that the shortcomings of CFA in multi-factor model estimation can be solved by ESEM. It is found that the results of ESEM are better than those of CFA and are more reasonable. In addition, the results show that the internal consistency reliability of each subscale and the theoretical validity of the questionnaire reach the expected acceptable level. Conclusion: on the whole, the reliability and validity of BRSQ-6 in Chinese version reach acceptable level, but the cross-factor phenomenon of individual items is abnormal and still needs to be further revised and tested.
【作者单位】：华南师范大学心理学院;广州体育学院;香港体育学院;香港浸会大学;
【基金】：香港浸会大学学院研究基金项目(编号:FRG2/14-15/103)
【分类号】：G804.8

【相似文献】