第31届奥运会中国男篮与对手防守战术运用的对比分析

发布时间：2019-05-30 10:28

【摘要】：本研究把第31届奥运会中国男篮与对手防守战术运用的对比分析作为研究对象,本文主要采用文献调查法与录像观察法等研究方法,结合比赛录像分析对比中国男篮与其对手在比赛中运用的战术类型、战术过程和战术结果,得出结论如下:1.从第31届里约奥运会的男篮比赛中可以看出,当前世界高水平篮球队伍可以凭借场上的各种变化,采用相对合理准确的的防守战术作出及时的调整,使防守对象的层次感更加突出,防守重点更加明显,很好地诠释了现代篮球防守运动的趋势。2.在第31届里约奥运会中,除委内瑞拉男篮外,中国男篮同与赛队的防守战术主要采用以半场人盯人防守战术为主,其次是快攻防守战术,区域联防战术的运用大多出现在球队战术变化时,混合防守和综合防守的使用次数较少。相比与赛队灵活多变的防守战术,中国队在防守战术选择方面过于单调,变化次数少,且比较被动,未能及时根据对手的进攻方式作出相应的调整。3.中国队运用最多的防守战术是半场人盯人防守,尤其是半场缩小人盯人防守的运用。中国队很好地利用了自身内线的身高优势,但在战术执行力方面较差,队员之间换防、协防及补防的能力不足,防守时队员意识差,移动速度慢且重心高,对持球队员的防守未能进行有效地紧逼、包夹控制。从每场的平均失分可以看出,对手防守战术整体成功率要高于中国队。4.在防快攻方面,中国队与其对手相比,回防速度慢,意识不强,队员分工不明确,防守配合不默契,在比赛中,表现出来防守效果较差。5.从中国队的五场比赛中,全场紧逼和全场人盯人防守的运用次数可以看出,中国队明显少于其他对手,在体能储备、身体对抗以及战术的运用过程方面要弱于其他队。
[Abstract]:In this study, the comparative analysis of the use of defensive tactics between Chinese men's basketball team and opponents in the 31st Olympic Games is taken as the research object. This paper mainly adopts the methods of literature investigation and video observation. Combined with the video analysis of the game, the tactical types, tactical process and tactical results used by the Chinese men's basketball team and their opponents in the game are analyzed and compared, and the conclusions are as follows: 1. From the men's basketball match of the 31st Rio Olympic Games, we can see that the current world high-level basketball team can make timely adjustments by using relatively reasonable and accurate defensive tactics by virtue of all kinds of changes on the court. So that the hierarchical sense of the defensive object is more prominent, the focus of defense is more obvious, which is a good explanation of the trend of modern basketball defense. 2. In the 31st Rio Olympic Games, in addition to the Venezuelan men's basketball team, the defense tactics of the Chinese men's basketball team were mainly half-game man-to-man defense, followed by the fast attack defense tactics. The use of regional joint defense tactics mostly occurs when the team tactics change, the use of mixed defense and comprehensive defense is less. Compared with the flexible and changeable defensive tactics of the match team, the Chinese team is too monotonous in the choice of defensive tactics, less times of change, and more passive, unable to make corresponding adjustments according to the opponent's offensive mode in time. The most widely used defensive tactics in China are half-time man-to-man defense, especially half-time reduction of man-to-man defense. The Chinese team has made good use of its own height advantage, but its tactical execution ability is poor, the ability of changing defense, cooperation and defense between players is insufficient, the consciousness of the players is poor, the speed of movement is slow and the center of gravity is high. The defense of the player who holds the ball can not be effectively pressed and clamped. From the average loss of points per game, it can be seen that the overall success rate of defensive tactics is higher than that of the Chinese team. 4. In the aspect of fast attack, compared with its opponents, the Chinese team has a slow speed, a weak consciousness, a unclear division of labor, a lack of tacit understanding in defense cooperation, and a poor defensive effect in the game. 5. From the five games of the Chinese team, we can see that the Chinese team is significantly less than the other opponents in terms of physical reserve, physical confrontation and the use of tactics.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841

【相似文献】