大学生谦虚问卷的编制及初步应用
发布时间:2018-05-28 02:10
本文选题:谦虚 + 问卷编制 ; 参考:《南京师范大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:在中国传统文化里,谦虚一直被认为是一种传统美德。随着中国的改革开放,大学生受到西方的意识形态、价值观、人生观以及为人处世方式的影响。不少大学生对我国传统文化中优秀的思想出现怀疑、厌烦、摈弃等现象。对大学生而言,对待谦虚的态度已经出现歪曲理解。大学生认为谦虚会失去机会,会埋没自己的才能等等。因此研究谦虚具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。 以往的研究仅注重谦虚的某一个方面,没有对谦虚的维度做合理的划分,谦虚的测量工具很少,本研究就是以建构谦虚理论和编制谦虚问卷为主要研究内容。 在进行本研究之初,我们查阅了大量的古今关于谦虚研究的资料,对谦虚思想进行梳理和总结,在此基础上,我们将谦虚划分为四个维度,即谦虚认知、谦虚情绪、谦虚动机、谦虚行为。编制了谦虚初测问卷,运用初测问卷调查了103名大学生,然后经过项目分析和探索性因素分析,形成再次试测问卷;用再次试测问卷调查了165名大学生,然后再进行项目分析和探索性因素分析,最终形成正式问卷;正式问卷包括谦虚认知、谦虚情绪、谦虚动机、谦虚行为四个维度,每个维度各包括5个项目,总共20个项目。 运用正式问卷调查了安徽三所高校大学生共600名。然后进行统计分析,问卷内部一致性克伦巴赫α系数为0.808,分半信度系数为0.714,表明问卷的稳定可靠;相关矩阵和验证性因素分析表明问卷的结构符合量表编制的基本要求,表明本问卷具有良好的效度。 对大学生谦虚心理的特点进行分析,本调查表明,大学生在谦虚认知和谦虚行为两个维度上存在独生子女与非独生子女差异;在谦虚动机维度上存在城乡差异。其它维度和总分均不存在差异,所有维度和总分不存在性别、年级差异。在讨论中结合以往研究和心理学理论对这些差异做了分析。 本研究得到如下结论: (1)谦虚是一个多层次、多维度的心理结构。研究结果与大学生谦虚心理理论的构想是一致的,大学生谦虚心理可以分为谦虚认知、谦虚情绪、谦虚动机、谦虚行为四个维度。 (2)大学生谦虚问卷具有良好的信效度,可以作为测量谦虚心理的适宜工具。 (3)大学生谦虚的特征主要表现在,谦虚认知和谦虚行为两个维度上存在独生子女与非独生子女差异;在谦虚动机维度上存在城乡差异。其它维度和总分均不存在差异,所以维度和总分不存在性别、年级差异性。
[Abstract]:In Chinese traditional culture, modesty has always been regarded as a kind of traditional virtue. With the reform and opening up of China, college students are influenced by Western ideology, values, outlook on life and the way of human life. Many college students are doubting, weary, and abandoning the excellent ideas of Chinese traditional culture. The attitude of modesty has been distorted. College students believe that modesty will lose the opportunity, and it will bury its talents. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study modesty.
The previous research only pays attention to a certain aspect of modesty, does not make a reasonable division of the modest dimension, and the modest measurement tools are very few. This study is mainly based on the construction of modesty theory and the compilation of modesty questionnaire.
At the beginning of this study, we consulted a large number of ancient and modern information about modesty and summarized the modesty thought. On this basis, we divided modesty into four dimensions, namely, modesty, modesty, modesty, modesty, modesty. We compiled a modest survey questionnaire and investigated 103 college students by the initial survey questionnaire. Then after the project analysis and exploratory factor analysis, a re test questionnaire was formed, and 165 college students were investigated by the re test questionnaire, then the project analysis and exploratory factor analysis were carried out, and the formal questionnaire was finally formed. The formal questionnaire includes four dimensions of modesty, modesty, modesty and modesty, each dimension It includes 5 projects, with a total of 20 projects.
A total of 600 college students in three colleges and universities in Anhui were investigated with a formal questionnaire, and the statistical analysis was carried out. The internal consistency Karen Bach alpha coefficient was 0.808 and the partial half reliability coefficient was 0.714, indicating that the questionnaire was stable and reliable. The correlation matrix and the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the structure of the questionnaire accords with the basic requirements of the scale compilation. The volume has good validity.
The characteristics of College Students' modesty psychology are analyzed. The survey shows that there are differences between the only children and the non only children in the two dimensions of modesty and modesty; there are differences in urban and rural areas in the dimension of modesty motivation. There is no difference between the other dimensions and the total score, and there is no gender and grade difference in the dimensions and total scores. These differences are analyzed in combination with previous studies and psychological theories.
The results of this study are as follows:
(1) modesty is a multi-level, multi-dimensional psychological structure. The results of the study are in accordance with the conception of the college students' modesty theory. The college students' modesty can be divided into four dimensions: modesty cognition, modesty, modesty and modesty.
(2) the modesty questionnaire of college students has good reliability and validity, and can be used as an appropriate tool for measuring modesty psychology.
(3) the characteristics of the modesty of college students are mainly manifested in the difference between the only child and the non only child on the two dimensions of modesty and modesty; there are differences in urban and rural areas in the dimension of modesty motivation. There is no difference between the other dimensions and the total scores, so there is no difference in dimension and total score and grade difference.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:B844.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董新;;中西方人对于称赞的不同回应方式——谈中国人的谦虚准则和西方人的一致准则[J];沧桑;2008年03期
2 崔红,王登峰;中国人人格结构的确认与形容词评定结果[J];心理与行为研究;2003年02期
3 汪凤炎;郑红;;孔子界定“君子人格”与“小人人格”的十三条标准[J];道德与文明;2008年04期
4 季羡林;;谦虚与虚伪[J];国学;2010年07期
5 汪凤炎;尚“和”:中国人的集体潜意识[J];江西师范大学学报;2001年01期
6 胡金生;;中国人自谦的动机及其与主观幸福感的关系[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2009年05期
7 姚本先;对谦虚的社会心理思考[J];社会;1988年07期
8 燕国材;;论谦虚心与学习[J];上海教育科研;2010年10期
9 胡元江;候燕;;中西方文化中的谦虚观念之比较[J];鸡西大学学报;2007年05期
10 傅根跃,陈伟伟;小学儿童谦虚的道德评价[J];心理科学;2000年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 陈碧云;南京学生的自我增强现状及其影响因素的研究[D];南京师范大学;2008年
2 潘小q.;大学生健康人格与心理健康、自我和谐的关系研究[D];漳州师范学院;2010年
,本文编号:1944789
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xueshengguanli/1944789.html