电子商务交易平台经营者监管义务研究

发布时间：2018-04-21 11:33

本文选题：电子商务交易平台经营者 + 法律性质　；参考：《北京工商大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文所称的监管义务是指电子商务平台经营者作为市场主体和电子商务社会共治的参与者,基于自治原则,对平台内经营者及其交易活动履行监督、检查、约束、管理等义务的总称,与行政法意义上政府部门的监管职责并非同一性质。文章主要通过五个部分对相关主题进行探讨。第一,引入一个权利人诉电子商务交易平台经营者——淘宝公司的侵权案件,提出问题:权利人在淘宝网上买到假货,淘宝公司是否承担赔偿责任。第二,本文对平台的法律性质认定为虚拟市场交易的经营者,从法律性质明确电子商务交易平台承担监管义务的依据,包括理论依据和实践依据。理论依据包括:“收益与风险相一致理论”、“风险控制理论”、“效益最大化理论”、“安全保障义务理论”。实践依据从现行法律规定和平台监管的实践及自治规则探讨。第三,明确平台监管与政府监管的区别、平台承担有限的监管责任,平台应尽到合理、可预见范围内的监管责任。第四,明确平台监管义务的内容及认定标准,包括对平台内经营者的监管义务、对平台内发布的商品或服务信息的监管义务、对通过平台销售质量不合格或假冒伪劣商品的监管义务以及对侵害知识产权或不正当竞争行为的监管义务。最后,探讨平台未履行监管义务的民事责任,包括平台未履行监管义务承担民事责任的情形、平台所实行的过错与无过错责任并行的归责原则以及对导致平台承担连带责任的情形进行探讨。经过层层分析,确定电子商务交易平台的监管义务的具体内容及界定的标准,并提出立法建议。
[Abstract]:The regulatory obligation referred to in this paper refers to the e-commerce platform operators as the market subject and the participants of the e-commerce society, based on the principle of autonomy, the platform operators and their trading activities to perform supervision, inspection, restraint, The general term of management and other obligations is not the same nature as the supervisory responsibility of government departments in the sense of administrative law. This paper mainly discusses the relevant themes through five parts. First, it introduces a tort case of Taobao Company, which is the operator of electronic commerce trading platform, and puts forward the question: the obligee buys fake goods on Taobao, and Taobao Company is liable for compensation. Secondly, this paper regards the legal nature of the platform as the operator of the virtual market transaction. From the legal nature, it clarifies the basis of the supervision obligation of the electronic commerce trading platform, including the theoretical basis and the practical basis. The theoretical basis includes: "income and risk consistent theory", "risk control theory", "benefit maximization theory", "security obligation theory". Practice basis from the current legal provisions and platform supervision of the practice and autonomy rules. Third, make clear the difference between platform supervision and government supervision, the platform bears limited supervision responsibility, the platform should be reasonable, predictable scope of regulatory responsibility. Fourth, the content of the platform regulatory obligations and standards, including the platform operators regulatory obligations, the platform published goods or services information regulatory obligations, Regulatory obligations for the sale of unqualified or counterfeit goods through platforms and for infringement of intellectual property rights or unfair competition. Finally, it discusses the civil liability for the failure of the platform to comply with its regulatory obligations, including the situation in which the platform fails to fulfil its regulatory obligations and bears civil liability. This paper discusses the principle of concurrent liability of fault and no-fault liability and discusses the situation that leads to joint and several liability of platform. Through layer by layer analysis, the concrete content and standard of supervision obligation of electronic commerce trading platform are determined, and legislative suggestions are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：北京工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】