第三方电子数据保全的应用性分析

发布时间：2019-02-09 18:34

【摘要】：随着电子信息技术的成熟,互联网络已经同我们密不可分。电子商务、互联网金融、网络社交、网络生态圈等电子信息产品带来了巨大的便捷,但也产生了大量新问题、新挑战,对我们的诉讼工作提出了新的要求:既要在纷繁复杂的电子数据中对证据证明力进行判定,又要高效便捷地推进诉讼程序。电子数据作为基于电子信息科技产生的独立证据类型,在这种新的挑战和要求中,发挥着愈发重要的作用。但电子数据的应用也存在问题:一方面,电子数据自身具有流动难固定、脆弱易损改等特点,保存固化难度较大,对及时固化和技术支持的要求较高。另一方面,传统证据保全中申请证据保全的程序较为繁琐和被动,难以满足当事人对电子数据保全的需求。这就要求一种高效便捷、安全可靠、排他可行的电子数据固化系统,在保证电子数据真实性、合法性、关联性的同时满足当事人的效率要求。由此,第三方电子数据保全平台应运而生,并在司法实务得到了应用与实践。本文旨对第三方电子数据保全与传统电子数据保全的异同、该平台证据保全的可行性、第三方电子数据保全的特点和原则进行分析,并结合实务考察对该类平台的应用问题予以剖析,提出完善建议。本文除去引言和结语外,由以下五个部分构成:第一部分,从电子数据保全的环境分析入手,以电子数据在诉讼中广泛应用与传统电子数据保全模式不足的矛盾作为逻辑起点,引出第三方电子数据保全的内涵和价值。第二部分就第三方电子数据保全的可行性进行探讨。这部分从主体、时间、管辖这三个方面的可行性进行分析。电子数据保全对传统的证据保全有了主体上的突破,继而对“第三方”成为电子数据保全主体的可行性进行探讨。对时间的分析主要从诉前与诉讼中这两个阶段进行。对管辖的探讨从证据保全管辖规定开始,分析第三方跨区划保全电子数据的可行性。第三部分主要从保全主体的多元化、技术性以及保全的便捷性和高效性三个方面阐述第三方电子数据保全的特征。第四部分则是从及时性、合法性、保密性、全面性等四个原则分析第三方电子数据保全的原则。第五部分分为对第三方电子数据保全的困境分析与完善建议两个层次。困境分析方面:从保全前当事人身份的确认与保全对象真实性的确认,再推及保全中技术保障的分析,分析应用中证明力受质疑的困境。完善与建议方面则主要从法律制度保障上延展开来,欲寻得专业技术与法律实务良性结合的模式。
[Abstract]:With the maturity of electronic information technology, the Internet has been inseparable with us. Electronic commerce, Internet finance, social networking, network ecosphere and other electronic information products have brought great convenience, but they have also produced a large number of new problems and challenges. This paper puts forward new requirements for our litigation work: not only to judge the power of proof in the complicated electronic data, but also to advance the litigation procedure efficiently and conveniently. Electronic data, as an independent evidence type based on electronic information technology, plays an increasingly important role in this new challenge and requirement. However, there are some problems in the application of electronic data: on the one hand, the electronic data itself has the characteristics of difficult to fix flow, fragile and vulnerable, difficult to preserve and solidify, and high requirement for timely solidification and technical support. On the other hand, the procedure of applying for evidence preservation in traditional evidence preservation is more complicated and passive, so it is difficult to meet the parties' demand for electronic data preservation. This requires an efficient, convenient, safe and reliable, exclusive and feasible electronic data solidification system, which ensures the authenticity, legitimacy and relevance of electronic data, and meets the efficiency requirements of the parties at the same time. As a result, third-party electronic data preservation platform emerged as the times require, and has been applied and practiced in judicial practice. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the similarities and differences between the third party electronic data preservation and the traditional electronic data preservation, the feasibility of the evidence preservation of the platform, the characteristics and principles of the third party electronic data preservation. Combined with practical investigation, the application of this kind of platform is analyzed, and some suggestions are put forward. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper consists of the following five parts: the first part, starting with the environmental analysis of electronic data preservation, takes the contradiction between the extensive application of electronic data in litigation and the insufficiency of traditional electronic data preservation mode as the logical starting point. The connotation and value of third party electronic data preservation are introduced. The second part discusses the feasibility of third party electronic data preservation. This part from the subject, time, jurisdiction of these three aspects of the feasibility of analysis. Electronic data preservation has made a breakthrough on the traditional evidence preservation, and then discusses the feasibility of "third party" becoming the subject of electronic data preservation. The analysis of time is mainly carried out from the two stages of pre-litigation and litigation. This paper analyzes the feasibility of third-party cross-zoning preservation of electronic data from the view of evidence preservation. The third part mainly expounds the characteristics of third party electronic data preservation from the aspects of diversification, technology, convenience and efficiency. The fourth part analyzes the third-party electronic data preservation principle from four principles: timeliness, legality, confidentiality and comprehensiveness. The fifth part is divided into three-party electronic data preservation predicament analysis and perfect suggestion two levels. Dilemma analysis: from the prior confirmation of the identity of the parties to the preservation and the authenticity of the preservation object, and the analysis of the technical support in the preservation, the dilemma that the power of proof is questioned in the application is analyzed. The perfection and suggestion mainly extend from the legal system guarantee to seek the pattern of the benign combination of professional technology and legal practice.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925

【相似文献】