论汽车零部件销售的纵向垄断认定及法律规制
发布时间:2018-02-24 08:35
本文关键词: 纵向垄断 规制原则 汽车零部件销售 规制 出处:《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:目前汽车已经逐渐进入寻常百姓家,汽车行业存在的问题与普通人息息相关,但买车不难养车却不易,因为汽车的维修费用高得让很多人难以承受。可以说,汽车零部件销售之所以存在如此高的暴利,就是因为垄断。汽车零部件最突出的,就是各种纵向垄断行为。纵向垄断协议作为垄断协议之一,是各个国家反垄断法体系重点关注的对象。不同于横向垄断协议可以直接适用本身违法原则,纵向垄断协议往往需要结合不同的因素综合加以判定,往往也就具有隐蔽性。但是,在纵向非价格垄断上,对消费者利益的损害是显而易见的,特别是汽车零部件销售行业,尤为明显。我国目前《反垄断法》对纵向垄断规定较为“粗放”,没那么细致,操作上也较为不容易。对于汽车行业进行规制的《汽车品牌销售管理办法》又存在一系列问题,逐渐不适合当前汽车行业发展的趋势。 全文围绕着《反垄断法》、《汽车品牌销售管理办法》中相关规定,借鉴其他国家对于纵向垄断的规定,同时结合其他国家对汽车行业的规制进行论述。在分析过程中不仅注重理论的阐述,而且结合我国汽车行业具体情况进行界定,重点剖析我国汽车零部件销售中存在一系列纵向垄断问题,并结合自己专业知识提出规制的意见和建议。 全文共分为四章,第一章是汽车零部件市场概述,阐述我国汽车零部件销售市场的构成,发展环境及存在的一系列问题。第二章则是在纵向垄断理论基础上对我国汽车零部件纵向垄断行为进行分析,包括对垄断行为判定规则的论述,除本身违法原则以及合理性原则外,还分析了白名单制度或适用除外制度也是反垄断法判定规则的有效补充。同时,对汽车零部件销售中的具体的垄断行为进行介绍,分析该等垄断行为形成的原因。第三章主要分析我国目前我国汽车零部件销售纵向垄断的规制现状,包括国外的规制制度,我国《汽车品牌销售管理办法》以及《反垄断法》,并分析产业政策和竞争政策的关系。第四章对我国汽车零部件行业提出规制建议,并结合其他国家的法律法规进行分析。
[Abstract]:At present, cars have gradually entered the homes of ordinary people, and the problems existing in the automobile industry are closely related to ordinary people, but it is not difficult to buy a car and keep a car, because the maintenance cost of the car is too high for many people to bear. It can be said that, The reason why there is such a high profit in auto parts sales is because of monopoly. The most prominent feature of auto parts is all kinds of vertical monopoly behaviors. Vertical monopoly agreements are one of the monopoly agreements. Different from horizontal monopoly agreement can directly apply its own illegal principle, vertical monopoly agreement often needs to be combined with different factors to determine. But in vertical non-price monopolies, the damage to consumer interests is obvious, especially in the auto parts sales industry. This is especially obvious. At present, the "antimonopoly law" in our country is relatively "extensive" to the vertical monopoly regulations, which are not so detailed and not easy to operate. There are a series of problems in the "measures of Automobile Brand sales Management", which regulate the automobile industry. Gradually is not suitable for the current trend of development of the automotive industry. The full text revolves around the relevant provisions of the Anti-monopoly Law and the measures for the Management of Automobile Brand sales, and draws lessons from the vertical monopoly provisions of other countries. At the same time combined with other countries to discuss the regulation of the automobile industry. In the process of analysis not only pay attention to the theoretical elaboration, but also combined with the specific situation of China's automobile industry to define, This paper mainly analyzes a series of vertical monopoly problems in auto parts sales in China, and puts forward some suggestions and suggestions on regulation combined with our own professional knowledge. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is an overview of the auto parts market. The second chapter analyzes the longitudinal monopoly behavior of automobile parts in China on the basis of vertical monopoly theory, including the discussion of the rules of judging monopoly behavior. Besides the principle of violating the law and the principle of rationality, it also analyzes that the white list system or the applicable exception system is also an effective supplement to the judging rules of the anti-monopoly law. At the same time, it introduces the specific monopoly behavior in the sale of automobile parts and components. The third chapter mainly analyzes the regulation status of vertical monopoly of auto parts sales in China, including the regulation system of foreign countries. The "Management measures of Automobile Brand sales" and "Anti-monopoly Law" in China, and the relationship between industrial policy and competition policy are analyzed. Chapter 4th puts forward some suggestions for regulation of auto parts industry in China, and analyzes the laws and regulations of other countries.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F426.471;F203;D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 李永钧;;《反垄断法》冲击中国汽车业?[J];汽车工业研究;2008年09期
2 王先林;论联合限制竞争行为的法律规制——《中华人民共和国反垄断法(草拟稿)》的相关部分评析[J];法商研究;2004年05期
3 ;我国汽车维修企业基本情况[J];实用汽车技术;2006年03期
4 王红娟;刘宇;;美国对汽车流通领域垄断行为的规制及对我国的启示[J];汽车与配件;2013年24期
5 董伟栋;吴松泉;;欧盟汽车销售法规的启示和借鉴[J];汽车与配件;2014年01期
,本文编号:1529579
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/gongyejingjilunwen/1529579.html