中国—东盟制造业垂直专业化分工研究
本文选题:中国-东盟 + 制造业 ; 参考:《广西大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:中国-东盟自由贸易区成立以来,双边分工模式逐步从基于要素禀赋差异的产业间分工走向基于规模经济和比较优势的产业内分工、产品内分工,再到垂直专业化分工,互补性分工程度不断加深。本文拟研究中国与东盟制造业垂直专业化分工,对垂直专业化分工程度进行测度,分析垂直专业化分工的影响因素,以期为推动中国与东盟国家的国际分工与合作,实现分工比较优势提供对策。 首先,本文较为系统的总结了已有的关于国际垂直专业化分工的理论。主要包括:主流的定义,与其他相关概念的区别,测度方法及其比较,动因、影响因素和经济效应等。 其次,对中国-东盟制造业分行业的垂直专业化程度进行测度,发现中国与东盟的制造业垂直专业化程度从2002年到2007年一直处于稳步增长的趋势,在经历2008年的世界经济危机后有了一定程度的下滑,但到2010年后发生大幅逆转,呈现缓步增长的态势。另外,本文还分国别测度了中国分别与东盟十国的制造业垂直专业化分工程度,发现我国与马来西亚、新加坡、泰国的比率较高。 第三,利用面板数据模型从产业层面对中国-东盟制造业垂直专业化分工的影响因素进行研究,发现行业集中度、开放度、成本利润率对制造业行业整体的分工影响显著,劳动、资本和技术投入分别对劳动、资本和技术密集型产业影响显著,但劳动和资本投入对其对应的产业垂直专业化分工程度影响为负。 最后,基于实证研究结论为我国制造业在东盟乃至全球产品价值链分工地位的提升提出建议:培育我国各行业大型成熟规模企业,形成规模经济;加大RD投资,提升中国-东盟分工的技术水平与创新能力;打造中国-东盟区域联动产品分工链,将我国定位价值链高端节点;优化分工环境,打造中国-东盟垂直专业化分工的产业集群。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of the China-ASEAN Free Trade area, the bilateral division of labor has gradually changed from the inter-industry division based on factor endowment difference to the intra-industry division based on economies of scale and comparative advantage, the intra-product division of labor, and the vertical specialization. The degree of complementary division of labor continues to deepen. This paper intends to study the vertical specialization of manufacturing industry between China and ASEAN, measure the degree of vertical specialization, and analyze the influencing factors of vertical specialization, in order to promote the international division of labor and cooperation between China and ASEAN countries. The realization division of labor comparative advantage provides the countermeasure. First of all, this paper systematically summarizes the existing theories of international vertical specialization. It mainly includes: the definition of mainstream, the difference with other related concepts, the measurement method and its comparison, the motivation, the influence factor and the economic effect. Secondly, the vertical specialization degree of manufacturing industry between China and ASEAN is measured, and it is found that the vertical specialization degree of manufacturing industry between China and ASEAN has been increasing steadily from 2002 to 2007. After experiencing the world economic crisis in 2008, there has been some decline, but after 2010 there was a sharp reversal, showing a trend of slow growth. In addition, this paper measures the degree of vertical specialization of manufacturing industry between China and ASEAN countries, and finds that China has a higher ratio with Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Thirdly, using panel data model to study the factors that influence the vertical specialization of China-ASEAN manufacturing industry from the industrial level. It is found that the degree of industry concentration, openness and cost-profit rate have a significant impact on the overall division of labor in the manufacturing industry. Labor, capital and technology investment have significant effects on labor, capital and technology-intensive industries, but labor and capital investment have negative effects on the vertical specialization of their industries. Finally, based on the conclusions of empirical research, some suggestions are put forward for the promotion of the division of labor in the ASEAN and global product value chain of China's manufacturing industry: to cultivate large mature enterprises in various industries in China, to form economies of scale, to increase R D investment, and to increase R & D investment. To improve the technical level and innovation ability of China-ASEAN division of labor; to create the China-ASEAN regional linkage product division chain, to position China as the high-end node of the value chain; to optimize the division of labor environment; to create the industrial cluster of vertical specialization of China-ASEAN division of labor.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F424;F114.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴福象;经济全球化中制造业垂直分离的研究[J];财经科学;2005年03期
2 梁运文;张帅;;垂直专业化下中国制造业竞争力层次传导效应[J];财经研究;2011年12期
3 郭晶;赵越;;高技术产业国际分工地位的影响因素:基于完全国内增加值率视角的跨国实证[J];国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报);2012年02期
4 冼海钧;陈文慧;;基于产业链分工视角的中国与东盟国家的产业升级[J];南方金融;2010年08期
5 臧旭恒;赵明亮;;垂直专业化分工与劳动力市场就业结构——基于中国工业行业面板数据的分析[J];中国工业经济;2011年06期
6 胡昭玲;;产业内贸易与垂直专业化贸易比较及启示[J];国际经贸探索;2007年06期
7 赵立斌;;东盟在全球产品内分工的地位与跨国公司FDI[J];国际贸易问题;2012年10期
8 张少军;刘志彪;;国内价值链是否对接了全球价值链——基于联立方程模型的经验分析[J];国际贸易问题;2013年02期
9 彭支伟;刘钧霆;;东亚垂直专业化分工的发展及其影响因素的实证研究[J];世界经济研究;2008年12期
10 柯颖;于玲玲;;CAFTA框架下广西北部湾经济区物流产业发展战略研究[J];经济问题探索;2012年03期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 郭炳南;中国参与国际垂直专业化分工的经济效应研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
2 赵明亮;中国参与国际垂直专业化分工的经济效应研究[D];山东大学;2012年
3 谢锐;东亚区域经济一体化进程中中国贸易结构变迁与经济效应研究[D];湖南大学;2011年
,本文编号:2045364
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/gongyejingjilunwen/2045364.html