当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 金融论文 >

我国上市公司违规事件的市场反应研究

发布时间:2018-01-21 03:56

  本文关键词: 公司违规 动因研究 市场反应 实证检验 异常收益 累积异常收益 出处:《南京大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:证券市场监管的首要目标是保护中小投资者的利益,但是,从1996年5月31日到2014年3月14日,我国证券市场共发生上市公司违规事件6726起,从2009年后上市公司违规事件呈现逐年递增趋势,给投资者造成重大损失。上市公司违规事件对市场的负面影响有多大及其违规动因又是什么,在这样的背景之下,本文重点研究中国上市公司违规的市场反应与违规动因。在借鉴相关研究成果的基础上,本文选取2003-2012年我国沪深A股市场上市公司违规事件为样本,运用二元分类线性回归模型(Logistic回归模型)挖掘上市公司违规动因,得出5点结论:1.股权集中度高的上市公司违规概率越低,股权控制越分散的上市公司发生违规的概率越大。2.高管人员持股比例与上市公司违规概率显著正相关。3.股票交易活跃的上市公司有更低的违规概率。4.内部审计机制对上市公司违规没有约束作用。5.高资产负债率是我国上市公司违规的动因,总股本、审计委员会、利息保障倍数、现金比率、财务杠杆系数、净资产收益率(ROE)指标不构成上市公司违规动因。选取2003-2012年我国沪深A股市场上市公司违规事件为样本,采用事件研究法首先对上市公司违规的市场反应进行全样本检验,再进一步根据不同影响因素对违规事件的市场反应分类检验,得出5点结论:1.监管机构对上市公司违规行为进行处罚,市场在事件日前有预期,在事件日负面反应强烈,且事后还受到持续性的负面冲击,持续时间为10天,后开始小幅修正。2.不同的监管机构对上市公司违规事件处罚,市场都有预期并提前做出反应,事件日后受到持续的负面冲击,深圳证券交易所对上市公司做出的处罚对市场冲击程度最大,市场对深圳证券交易所的处罚过度反应。3.上市公司被监管机构公开批评、公开谴责、公开处罚,市场有预期并提前做出反应,事件日后市场有持续的负面冲击,其中公开处罚对市场负面影响程度最大,公开谴责没有威慑力。4.市场对上市公司违规占用公司资产、内幕交易负面反应最强烈,表现为过度反应。投资者对公司擅自违规改变资金用途不关心,对虚构利润、违规买卖股票表现不能容忍的态度,对推迟披露表达不满,对虚假记载负面反应强烈。5.不同行业的上市公司违规被处罚,公告日前市场都有预期,预期时间最早,对处罚信息传递最有效率的是信息技术及通信服务行业;公告日后,制造业、信息技术及通信服务业、采矿业、其他行业上市公司违规被处罚市场存在过度反应。
[Abstract]:The primary goal of securities market regulation is to protect the interests of small and medium-sized investors, but from May 31st 1996 to March 14th 2014. Since 2009, there have been 6,726 violations by listed companies in China's securities market, which have been increasing year by year since 2009. In such a context, what is the negative impact of listed companies' violations on the market and what are the reasons for such violations? This paper focuses on the market reaction and the motivation of violation of the regulations of listed companies in China. On the basis of reference of relevant research results. In this paper, we choose the listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share market as samples from 2003 to 2012. Using the binary classification linear regression model and Logistic regression model) mining listed companies violation motivation, draw 5 conclusions: 1. The higher the degree of ownership concentration, the lower the violation probability of listed companies. The more decentralized the equity control, the greater the probability of violation. 2. the proportion of senior managers holding shares and the violation probability of listed companies are significantly positive correlation .3. the listed companies with active stock trading have a lower probability of violation .4. The internal audit mechanism has no binding effect on the listed companies' violation. 5. high asset-liability ratio is the cause of the violation. Total share capital, audit committee, interest guarantee multiple, cash ratio, financial leverage factor. The index of return on net assets (ROEE) does not constitute the motivation of violation of listed companies. Select the listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share market from 2003 to 2012 as samples. First of all, the market reaction of listed companies is tested by the event study method, and then according to the different factors, the market reaction of the violations is classified. Draw a conclusion of 5 points: 1. The regulatory authorities punish listed companies for violations, the market expected before the event day, in the event of a strong negative reaction, but also sustained negative impact. The duration is 10 days, and then start to slightly revise .2. different regulators punish the listed companies for violations, the market has expected and reacted in advance, the incident will be sustained negative impact in the future. Shenzhen Stock Exchange on the listed companies to impose the biggest impact on the market, the market on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange punishment overreaction .3. listed companies have been publicly criticized by regulators, public condemnation. Public punishment, the market has expected and made a response in advance, the event after the market has a sustained negative impact, among them, the largest negative impact of public punishment on the market. Public condemnation of no deterrent. 4. the market to the listed company illegal occupation of the company's assets, insider trading negative reaction is the strongest, the overreaction. Investors do not care about the company unauthorized use of funds. False profits, illegal trading of stock performance intolerable attitude, to delay disclosure express dissatisfaction, false record negative reaction strong .5. different industries of listed companies were punished. The market is expected before the announcement day, expecting time is the earliest, the information technology and the communication service industry are the most efficient to the punishment information transmission; After the announcement, the manufacturing, information technology and communications services, mining, and other industries listed companies were punished by the market over-reaction.
【学位授予单位】:南京大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F832.51

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘婷;;透视绿大地财务违规事件[J];财务与会计(理财版);2011年12期

2 陆军;渡尽劫波希望在——一九九五年中国期货业回眸[J];特区与港澳经济;1996年Z1期

3 刘纯亮;普华永道违规事件的影响及启示[J];中国注册会计师;2001年09期

4 方雅茜;杨昀;;透过法兴违规事件看现代商业银行风险管理[J];农村金融研究;2008年06期

5 王汉卿;“长虹事件”透析[J];证券市场导报;1995年12期

6 谢志华;;规避快速成长中的财务与诚信风险[J];中外管理;2003年01期

7 ;今年前八月五大国有银行发现182起违规[J];党政干部文摘;2006年11期

8 牛梦香;李甫君;陈冬梅;;漯河市治理银行业商业贿赂扎实有效[J];决策探索;2006年08期

9 李文;;从法兴银行违规事件看金融业风险管理——ArcSight的信息安全之道[J];信息网络安全;2008年04期

10 白刚;;消费者信任是品牌的基础[J];销售与市场(评论版);2012年06期

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 记者 赵瑞希;控股股东无知无畏,中小板违规事件层出不穷[N];新华每日电讯;2011年

2 记者 徐洁净;严防违法违规事件的发生[N];平顶山日报;2006年

3 记者 刘倩 通讯员 陈志标;我市连续十一年无食品药品违规事件发生[N];永州日报;2011年

4 文言;何必总是“心太软”[N];人民日报;2007年

5 本报记者 孟斐;证监会通报五大经纪违规事件[N];财会信报;2009年

6 郝亚伟;本世纪以来西方主要金融风险及违规事件回顾[N];期货日报;2008年

7 记者 赵瑞希;中小板上市公司九类违规事件遭警示[N];经济参考报;2011年

8 记者 慈家野 通讯员 秦逸;“确保不再发生此类违规事件”[N];中国经济导报;2006年

9 证券时报记者  唐盛;海域逾6亿元人民币于违规事件曝光后转出[N];证券时报;2006年

10 本报记者 徐敏邋彭德倩;如何防治学术违规现象?[N];解放日报;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 黄天恩;我国上市公司违规事件的市场反应研究[D];南京大学;2014年



本文编号:1450391

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/guojijinrong/1450391.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户37527***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com