中美“337调查”贸易摩擦研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 15:31

本文选题：“337调查”　切入点：知识产权　出处：《安徽工业大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：中美两国自1979年建交以来,双边贸易取得了长足发展,但贸易摩擦也从未停息。随着我国对美出口产品结构的不断升级,“337调查”逐渐取代过去的“两反一保”措施成为贸易摩擦的主要手段。针对这一现象,本文在前人研究的基础上,从四个方面对“337调查”进行讨论。首先,从“337调查”制度的起源,调查程序以及救济措施三个方面对“337调查”制度进行概述,而后分析美国对华“337调查”的现状,并得出如下结论:我国是“337调查”的首要对象国、申请人的主要诉由为知识产权侵权、中国企业的败诉率高以及机电产品是主要被诉对象。其次,从宏观和微观两个角度探讨了美国对华发起“337调查”的原因。认为宏观方面的原因有三个,即美国维护知识产权竞争优势,两国专利竞争力相差悬殊致使我国产品易侵权以及美国贸易保护主义抬头;而微观方面的原因也有三个,即企业应诉不积极,“337调查”的特点是“337调查”多发的重要原因,我国企业缺乏自主知识产权和知识产权保护意识。接着分析了中国JW公司成功应诉日本KC公司“337调查”的经典案例,并总结出企业应对美国“337调查”的经验。然后,利用主成分分析法对“337调查”进行实证分析以确定引起美国对华发起“337调查”的主要原因,实证分析的结论认为:造成美国对华发起“337调查”的主要诱因是美国贸易保护主义抬头。最后,提出应对美国“337调查”的对策。从企业的角度而言,企业要提高自主创新能力,实施市场多元化战略以及积极在美注册专利以获得专利的交叉许可和制衡;而从政府的角度而言,政府要加大力度实施知识产权国家战略并且尝试建立起中国式的“337调查”条款。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States in 1979, bilateral trade has made considerable progress. However, trade friction has never ceased. With the continuous upgrading of China's export product structure to the United States, the "337 investigation" gradually replaced the past "two opposing, one guarantee" measures as the main means of trade friction. On the basis of previous studies, this paper discusses "337 investigation" from four aspects. Firstly, it summarizes the system of "337 investigation" from three aspects: the origin of "337 investigation" system, the investigation procedure and the relief measures. Then it analyzes the current situation of "337 investigation" in the United States, and draws the following conclusions: China is the primary target country of "337 investigation", and the main cause of the applicant's action is intellectual property infringement. The high rate of defeat of Chinese enterprises and the fact that mechanical and electrical products are the main objects of prosecution. Secondly, this paper discusses the causes of the "337 investigation" initiated by the United States in China from the macro and micro perspectives. It is believed that there are three reasons for the macro aspects. That is, the United States maintains the competitive advantage of intellectual property rights, and the disparity in patent competitiveness between the two countries has led to the rise of US trade protectionism and product infringement in China. There are also three reasons for the microcosmic reasons. That is, enterprises are not active in responding to complaints, and the characteristics of "337 investigation" are the important reasons for the frequent occurrence of "337 investigation". Chinese enterprises lack the consciousness of independent intellectual property rights and intellectual property protection. Then, this paper analyzes the classic cases of Chinese JW Company successfully responding to the "337 investigation" of Japanese KC Company, and sums up the experiences of the enterprises in dealing with the "337 investigation" in the United States. The principal component analysis method is used to make an empirical analysis of the 337 Survey to determine the main reasons that caused the US to launch the 337 Survey in China. The conclusion of the empirical analysis is that the main inducement of the "337 investigation" is the rise of American trade protectionism. Finally, the countermeasures to deal with the "337 survey" are put forward. From the perspective of enterprises, enterprises should improve their independent innovation ability. Implement a market diversification strategy and actively register patents in the United States to obtain cross-licensing and checks and balances; and from the government's point of view, The government will step up efforts to implement the IPR national strategy and try to establish a Chinese-style Section 337 investigation.
【学位授予单位】：安徽工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D822.371.2;F741.2

【参考文献】