年度流行语话语权力建构研究

发布时间：2018-03-15 06:35

本文选题：流行语　切入点：话语权力　出处：《山东师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来,传播媒介不断发展,反映社会事件和社会心理的流行语不断涌现,并迅速传播开来,被广泛应用到人们的日常生活中。流行语是具有时代特色的文化现象,研究流行语,可以跟踪当今时代社会生活和大众心理的变迁,可以发现人们在话语中所处的位置关系,从而把握话语甚至是社会文化的走向,使其向着一个更和谐的方向发展。本研究从年度流行语入手,运用内容分析、话语分析和个案研究,揭示出流行语背后所体现出的话语权力关系,并结合语言学、政治经济学派以及文化研究学派的理论知识,对年度流行语进行量化统计和质化分析,以理清流行语的话语权力的来源以及话语权力关系的建构和呈现。第一章从流行语话语内容分析入手,考察了年度流行语在话语来源、话语基调、话语传播平台上的特征。在归纳出年度流行语的总体分布情况和流行语变化的发展规律以及横向和纵向分析流行语的变化后,指出话语权力存在的事实,从而将流行语研究引入到关于话语权力的研究之中。第二章整合了流行语和话语权力的理论,并在仔细梳理权力概念的基础上,对流行语话语权力进行了一个清晰的界定。本研究将话语权力纳入到文化权力的范畴,并将其视为一种影响力的存在。作为一种文化权力,话语权力本身就具备了一定的特性,因此,在这一章分析出流行语话语权力的三种特性(依附性、隐蔽性、双向性),对流行语话语权力的内涵和外延做了一个清晰的界定。第三章对年度流行语话语权力进行了不同层次的解析,首先分析了流行语话语权力的三种不同表现形式(操纵、说服、权威),其次分析了流行语的话语权力来源,其来源主要有两个层次:话语表层结构来源和深层逻辑建构。而在这部分的阐述中,本研究分别从场域理论的宏观结构和敞视理论的微观视角分析话语权力的表层结构,再从话语本身具备的图腾崇拜和文化操纵功能的角度分析话语权力的深层逻辑建构。第四章根据内容分析的结果,探讨年度流行语话语权力的建构过程,主要包括话语权力的动态体现和话语博弈的不同表征。在研究话语权力的动态博弈过程中,本研究均从话语文本和话语力主体两个层面入手,认为话语文本的“谈判性”和权力主体的“流动性”为权力的动态博弈提供了可能,而且在一定程度上削弱了斗争双方的对抗强度,为话语权力的博弈带来了一定的解决途径。在本章的最后一部分,本研究结合不同媒介平台的特点分析出话语动态博弈的不同结果:收编和狂欢。收编体现出主流媒体中话语权力存在接合的可能性,狂欢则体现出网络媒体中大众对话语权力的生产式操纵,以此完成对年度流行语话语权力的建构研究。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous development of the media, catchwords reflecting social events and social psychology have emerged and spread rapidly, and have been widely used in people's daily life. Catchwords are a cultural phenomenon with the characteristics of the times. The study of catchwords can track the changes of social life and popular psychology in the present era, and find out the relationship between the position of people in the discourse, so as to grasp the trend of discourse and even social culture. This study begins with the annual catchwords, using content analysis, discourse analysis and case study to reveal the discourse power relationship behind the catchwords and combine with linguistics. The theoretical knowledge of the school of political economics and the school of cultural research, the quantitative statistics and qualitative analysis of the annual catchwords, In order to clarify the source of the utterance power and the construction and presentation of the relationship of the discourse power, the first chapter begins with the analysis of the content of the catchword discourse, and investigates the annual catchwords in the source of the discourse and the tone of the discourse. After summing up the general distribution of the annual catchwords, the development law of the catchword change and the horizontal and vertical analysis of the change of the catchword, the author points out the fact that the discourse power exists. The second chapter integrates the theory of catchword and discourse power and combs the concept of power carefully. This study brings discourse power into the category of cultural power and regards it as the existence of influence. As a kind of cultural power, discourse power has its own characteristics. Therefore, in this chapter, we analyze the three characteristics of the catchword discourse power (dependency, concealment, etc.). The third chapter analyzes the different levels of the annual catchword discourse power, and analyzes the three different forms of expression (manipulation) of the catchword discourse power. Persuasion, authority, secondly, analyzes the source of utterance power of catchwords, which comes from two levels: the source of discourse surface structure and the deep logical construction. This study analyzes the surface structure of discourse power from the macro structure of field theory and the microscopic perspective of open field theory. From the perspective of totem worship and cultural manipulation of discourse itself, this paper analyzes the deep logic construction of discourse power. Chapter 4th discusses the construction process of annual catchword discourse power according to the results of content analysis. It mainly includes the dynamic embodiment of discourse power and the different representation of discourse game. In the process of studying the dynamic game of discourse power, this study starts from the two levels of discourse text and discourse force. It is believed that the "negotiation" of discourse text and the "mobility" of the power subject provide the possibility for the dynamic game of power, and to some extent weaken the intensity of confrontation between the two sides of the struggle. It brings some solutions to the game of discourse power. In the last part of this chapter, According to the characteristics of different media platforms, this study analyzes the different results of discourse dynamic game: collection and carnival, which reflects the possibility of convergence of discourse power in mainstream media. Carnival reflects the productive manipulation of discourse power by the masses in network media, thus completing the research on the construction of the annual catchword discourse power.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G206

【参考文献】