政府生产性补贴与企业生产率关系的实证研究

发布时间：2018-05-01 22:07

本文选题：政府干预 + 生产性补贴　；参考：《南京大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：政府对经济的干预行为一直是经济学界研究的热点问题。尽管中国已经实现了从完全计划经济到市场经济的转型,但中央政府以及各级地方政府依然存在对宏观经济以及微观企业干预以实现政治性或经济性目标的强烈动机。在政府干预的诸多手段中,本文重点研究了政府补贴,尤其是其细分类别中的政府生产性补贴对企业生产率的影响,研究首先利用计量手段从总补贴数据中分离出RD补贴,进而估计企业生产性补贴的数量及分布,其次利用生产性补贴变量直接估计生产性补贴对企业生产率的影响。统计结果显示,RD补贴在总补贴中占有较大比重;剔除RD补贴数据可能存在的干扰后,国有企业和大型企业在生产性补贴的获得概率及获得数量方面都存在巨大优势,而其他所有制企业,特别是私营企业获得生产性补贴则较少。利用估计的生产性补贴数据对LP方法估计的企业生产率动态面板回归显示,生产性补贴对企业生产率的增长有显著的阻碍作用。进一步的分析显示,现有生产性补贴政策对短期固定投资的刺激效应及对RD和出口投资的挤出效应是影响企业生产率增长的重要原因。据此,本文提出了以下的政策建议:政府应引导企业合理使用政府补贴,帮助企业树立关注长期发展而非短期利益的发展理念;减少短期过度投资引起的资源浪费;政府决策部门应该建立更合理的补贴分配制度,避免资源错配乱配。
[Abstract]:Government intervention in the economy has been a hot issue in the field of economics. Although China has achieved the transition from a fully planned economy to a market economy, the central government and local governments at all levels still have a strong incentive to intervene in macroeconomic and microenterprises to achieve political or economic goals. Among the many means of government intervention, this paper focuses on the impact of government subsidies, especially the government productive subsidies in its subcategories, on the productivity of enterprises. Firstly, Rd subsidies are separated from the total subsidy data by means of measurement. Then it estimates the quantity and distribution of the productive subsidies, and then estimates the effects of the productive subsidies on the productivity of the enterprises directly by using the productive subsidy variables. The statistical results show that R D subsidies account for a large proportion of the total subsidies, excluding the possible interference of R D subsidy data, both state-owned enterprises and large enterprises have great advantages in terms of obtaining probability and quantity of productive subsidies. But other ownership enterprises, especially the private sector, receive less productive subsidies. The dynamic panel regression of the firm productivity estimated by LP method shows that the productive subsidy has a significant hindrance to the growth of enterprise productivity. Further analysis shows that the stimulating effect of the existing productive subsidy policies on short-term fixed investment and the crowding out effect on R D and export investment are the important reasons that affect the productivity growth of enterprises. Accordingly, this paper puts forward the following policy suggestions: the government should guide enterprises to make rational use of government subsidies, help enterprises to set up a development concept that pays attention to long-term development rather than short-term benefits, reduce the waste of resources caused by short-term overinvestment, and promote the development of enterprises. Government policy-making departments should establish a more reasonable subsidy allocation system to avoid mismatch of resources.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：F812.45;F279.2

【相似文献】