试理解污染避难所的假设

发布时间：2018-05-19 16:09

本文选题：显性比较优势 + 外国直接投资　；参考：《首都经济贸易大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来最受关注的话题之一是环境.在当今世界,几乎所有国家为将促进贸易和外国直接投资发展作为的目的,他们几乎失去了关注环境保护的概念。所以因此污染密集型产业会寻找一个“弱”或者不存在环境法规和相关规定的国家和地区,即所谓的“污染避难所”来发展他们的行业。本论文想要提出的问题是:“是否FDI真正会影响东道国的环境?如果有影响,那么在哪些方面?“由于缺乏变量和测量误差,几乎没有证据来支持所谓的PHH以及其于FDI的关系。本文将讨论如何发展中国家在生产“脏货”时具有比较优势(污染密集型商品),因此导致了这些国家吸引外国直接投资,这“无疑”会导致东道国将会创造污染避难所。本文将采用RCA方法(显示性比较优势),一向国际贸易中常用的研究方法,来比较两个国家的行业,在生产某些产品时,关注哪一个会显示性比较优势,,然后观察如果这就是它吸引了某些行业外国直接投资的原因。对比中国-美国进出口的一篮子商品(家具,汽车,塑料,制药设备,铜等)为例,看哪一个在生产肮脏商品具有优势和劣势。与此同时,在本论文采用计量经济学方式采集时间系列数据来对中国吸引FDI和工业污染气体排放做出相关的测试。在此之后,本文将试图证明,由于这个原因是,中国吸引了某些行业(脏产业)的外国直接投资在,正因为如此,它已经污染了自己的环境。同时论文也将在这一领域作比较取得多年来SO2排放量,看到如果有任何与外国直接投资的直接或者间接的关系,或者只是在当今世界很自然的现象。
[Abstract]:One of the most popular topics of concern in recent years is the environment. In today's world, almost all countries have lost the concept of environmental protection for the purpose of promoting trade and foreign direct investment. So pollution-intensive industries are looking for countries and regions that are "weak" or do not have environmental laws and regulations, or so-called "pollution havens" to develop their industries. The question this thesis wants to raise is: "is FDI really going to affect the environment of the host country?" If so, in what ways? "in the absence of variables and measurement errors, there is little evidence to support the so-called PHH and its relationship to FDI. This article discusses how developing countries have a comparative advantage in producing "dirty goods" (pollution-intensive commodities, which have led them to attract foreign direct investment, which "no doubt" will lead host countries to create pollution havens. This paper will use the RCA method (indicative comparative advantage), a research method commonly used in international trade, to compare the industries of the two countries in the production of certain products. Focus on which shows a comparative advantage, and see if that's why it attracts FDI in some industries. Compare a basket of Chinese-American imports and exports (furniture, cars, plastics, pharmaceutical equipment, copper, etc.) to see which has advantages and disadvantages in producing dirty goods. At the same time, this paper uses econometrics to collect time series data to test China's attraction to FDI and industrial pollution gas emissions. After that, this article will try to prove that, for this reason, China has attracted foreign direct investment in certain industries (dirty industries), and because of this, it has polluted its own environment. At the same time, the paper will compare the SO2 emissions in this field for many years, and see if there is any direct or indirect relationship with FDI, or only a natural phenomenon in today's world.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F832.6;X196

【相似文献】