斯密与李斯特经济学研究方法之比较

发布时间：2018-05-25 06:59

本文选题：斯密 + 李斯特　；参考：《河北大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文以亚当·斯密的《国民财富的性质和原因的研究》和弗里德里希·李斯特的《政治经济学的国民体系》两部经济学著作为基础，对斯密与李斯特经济学研究方法的异同进行了比较，并分析了斯密与李斯特所处的社会历史背景和所承继的思想渊源以及他们的研究方法对后世经济学产生的影响。由于所处的社会历史背景和思想渊源的不同，致使他们在经济学方法诸多方面产生了差异。斯密把个体作为经济学的基本分析单元，以价值概念为核心，运用现象描述法和抽象法构建了一套古典经济学理论体系；李斯特则把国家作为经济学的基本分析单元，，以生产力概念为核心，运用历史主义方法构建了不同于斯密的独具特色的理论体系。虽然他们的理论体系和研究方法存在很大差异，但他们在构建经济理论体系时也存在共性，即，他们都注重对经济史和经济学说史的考察。斯密与李斯特的经济学研究方法对后世经济学的发展产生了不可磨灭的影响。
[Abstract]:This paper is based on Adam Smith's the study of the Nature and causes of National Wealth and Friedrich Liszt's National system of political economy. This paper compares the similarities and differences between Smith and Liszt's economic research methods, and analyzes the social and historical background of Smith and Liszt's social and historical background, the ideological origin of their inheritance and the influence of their research methods on the economics of later generations. Because of their different social and historical backgrounds and ideological origins, they differ in many aspects of economic methods. Smith regards the individual as the basic analysis unit of economics, takes the concept of value as the core, uses the phenomenal description method and the abstract method to construct a set of classical economic theory system, while Liszt regards the country as the basic analysis unit of economics. Taking the concept of productivity as the core, this paper uses historicism to construct a unique theoretical system different from Smith. Although their theoretical system and research methods are very different, they also have commonness in constructing economic theory system, that is, they all pay attention to the investigation of economic history and economic theory history. Smith and Liszt's economic research methods have had an indelible influence on the development of economics in later generations.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：F091.3

【参考文献】