私有权的起源、地位与扬弃:卢梭与马克思的分歧

发布时间：2018-07-09 22:45

本文选题：不平等 + 社会契约　；参考：《贵州社会科学》2016年11期

【摘要】：私有权问题是社会发展研究的焦点。卢梭与马克思从不同的私有权内涵出发,探讨了私有权的起源,赋予了私有权不同的社会历史地位,提出了各自的扬弃方向与路径。卢梭把私有权与不平等联系起来,致力于设计公正的政治契约;马克思把私有权概念转化为私有制,致力于还原私有权的生产性和历史性。在私有制基础上发展生产力是社会的现实选择,卢梭的社会契约模式可以成为私有制扬弃的政治路径。
[Abstract]:Private right is the focus of social development research. Starting from the different connotation of private right, Rousseau and Marx discussed the origin of private right, endowed different social and historical status of private right, and put forward their respective sublation direction and path. Rousseau linked private right to inequality and devoted himself to designing a just political contract; Marx transformed the concept of private right into private ownership and devoted himself to restoring the productive and historic private right. It is a social choice to develop productive forces on the basis of private ownership, and Rousseau's social contract model can become the political path of sublation of private ownership.
【作者单位】：北京大学;
【基金】：北大未名集团委托课题“共产主义理论与实践——马克思主义视域下的未名公社”(20151101)
【分类号】：F014.1

【相似文献】